If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"paul kgyy" wrote in message ups.com... I was doing some practice IFR at home last night with my simulator, and set up for random failures. First thing that happened was complete electrical shut down - no radios, no VOR, no Xponder, and it suddenly occurred to me that I'd never thought through what I would do. I do carry backup comm and gps but what if those batteries were also dead, and I'm in IMC? This comes very close to the category of a non-critical emergency, defined as an emergency where, no matter what you do, you are going to die. It is one of the reasons that single engine light aircraft are unsuitable for long periods of flight in IMC. Another, of course, is what do you do if your engine quits? I think that it depends somewhat, too, on where you are and what you are doing when everything goes dark. Suppose you were on an ILS, 500 feet above DH and in IMC, and you lose your electrical system, what do you do? You just might be better off trying to continue the approach holding your heading and rate of descent as closely as possible. You have to have an out, or you don't do it. It is that simple. I would hate to have to rely on a handheld GPS in such an emergency, though of course it would be welcome as better than nothing. Not having that, dead reckoning is a possibility and it is a skill that should be practiced. A handheld radio is probably going to be almost useless, though some of them have VOR. I also have considered the practicality of heading for the shore, descending to where I could see the ocean, then flying back in below the scud. The trouble with this is that visibility usually gets worse over the ocean and near the shoreline. There are still obstructions and terrain to be dealt with, and now you have lost any practical ability to navigate with dead reckoning. You are also going to use up a lot of fuel and you are burning daylight (if it is night, well, you are welcome to try anything you want, but your chances of surviving a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head are probably better). If you know that you can climb out of the clouds, then that is probably a good option, but this presupposes either more luck than you deserve or you planned on this being your out in the first place (do you really trust the area forecast that much, and where are those tops, anyway?). You are still left with the problem of finding a place to descend through the clouds safely and land without running out of fuel, daylight, and ideas. Descending out of the clouds might work, provided you don't hit anything on the way or end up in a box canyon somewhere. Newer single engine aircraft with glass cockpits have backup instruments and some sort of backup electrical system, even if it is only certified for 30 minutes. They also have terrain displays so that you have at least a small chance of descending out of the clouds without killing yourself. If equipped for it, I would consider a total loss of the electrical system a legitimate reason for deploying an emergency parachute such as CAPS. Beyond that, I would say that you are taking a serious risk if you insist on flying a single engine piston airplane in actual IMC beyond, say, punching through a thin layer. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
"Roy Smith" wrote in message ... Living near the coast (and a flat coastline too), I've often figured in such a situation I'd dead-reckon out over the ocean, do a blind letdown as low as I dared (500 MSL?) and hope I broke out. Then scud-run back to land and hope I could find a coastal airport by pilotage before I got run over by a jet. Or maybe land on the beach. Well, as long as the coast is flat, it is day, and the weather does not get worse at the coastline, maybe. So you land on the beach, which sounds best to me, but suppose you are forced to land in someplace not so suitable and you damage the plane and perhaps yourself? Now you are a long way off course and nobody has any idea where to look for you. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
"C J Campbell" wrote in message ... "Roy Smith" wrote in message ... Living near the coast (and a flat coastline too), I've often figured in such a situation I'd dead-reckon out over the ocean, do a blind letdown as low as I dared (500 MSL?) and hope I broke out. Then scud-run back to land and hope I could find a coastal airport by pilotage before I got run over by a jet. Or maybe land on the beach. Well, as long as the coast is flat, it is day, and the weather does not get worse at the coastline, maybe. So you land on the beach, which sounds best to me, but suppose you are forced to land in someplace not so suitable and you damage the plane and perhaps yourself? Now you are a long way off course and nobody has any idea where to look for you. Now the only question is, do you have a beautiful woman with you, or not? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
" wrote in message ... Well, as long as the coast is flat, it is day, and the weather does not get worse at the coastline, maybe. So you land on the beach, which sounds best to me, but suppose you are forced to land in someplace not so suitable and you damage the plane and perhaps yourself? Now you are a long way off course and nobody has any idea where to look for you. Now the only question is, do you have a beautiful woman with you, or not? Generally not. She hates to fly. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
C J Campbell wrote:
This comes very close to the category of a non-critical emergency, defined as an emergency where, no matter what you do, you are going to die. That's a hell of a defeatist attitude, and demonstrably wrong since people HAVE survived exactly this situation. I would hate to have to rely on a handheld GPS in such an emergency, though of course it would be welcome as better than nothing. Actually, it is DRAMATICALLY better than nothing. It is more accurate, more precise, and more reliable than any NDB and most VOR's. It can effectively be used to shoot an overlay of any published NDB, VOR, or VOR-DME approach to published minima. Being self-contained with its own batteries, it is independent of the failure modes of the aircraft (including the electrical bus) and thus is superior as a navigation backup to anything installed in any certified single or light twin. The ability to shoot an overlay using a handheld GPS should be part of the repertoire of any instrument pilot. If you don't know how, ask your instructor to show you. If he can't, he's not much of an instructor. Newer single engine aircraft with glass cockpits have backup instruments and some sort of backup electrical system, even if it is only certified for 30 minutes. That's because they lack vacuum, and thus in such aircraft electrical failure also means gyro failure. I find that pretty scary. Vacuum may suck, but at least it's a totally independent system. There are ways of making electric backup systems truly independent and failsafe, but none are available for certified single engine airplanes. They also have terrain displays so that you have at least a small chance of descending out of the clouds without killing yourself. Terrain displays are available on the newer high-end handheld GPS units. Beyond that, I would say that you are taking a serious risk if you insist on flying a single engine piston airplane in actual IMC beyond, say, punching through a thin layer. That must be why self-flown business flights, which do this routinely, are so much more dangerous than personal flights, which rarely do this. Oh, wait... Michael |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
"Michael" wrote in message oups.com... C J Campbell wrote: This comes very close to the category of a non-critical emergency, defined as an emergency where, no matter what you do, you are going to die. That's a hell of a defeatist attitude, and demonstrably wrong since people HAVE survived exactly this situation. Yes, and people have survived jumping out of the plane without a parachute at 20,000 feet, too. But the odds are against it. Personally, I think the way you deal with an electrical failure in IMC with no GPS or handheld radio is that you avoid putting yourself in a situation where that can happen. I would hate to have to rely on a handheld GPS in such an emergency, though of course it would be welcome as better than nothing. Actually, it is DRAMATICALLY better than nothing. It is more accurate, more precise, and more reliable than any NDB and most VOR's. NDB, yes. VOR, highly questionable. The ability to shoot an overlay using a handheld GPS should be part of the repertoire of any instrument pilot. If you don't know how, ask your instructor to show you. I would agree with that. Newer single engine aircraft with glass cockpits have backup instruments and some sort of backup electrical system, even if it is only certified for 30 minutes. That's because they lack vacuum Nonsense. Most of them have backup vacuum instruments and even have dual vacuum pumps, which older airplanes lack. They also have terrain displays so that you have at least a small chance of descending out of the clouds without killing yourself. Terrain displays are available on the newer high-end handheld GPS units. True, mine has that. Beyond that, I would say that you are taking a serious risk if you insist on flying a single engine piston airplane in actual IMC beyond, say, punching through a thin layer. That must be why self-flown business flights, which do this routinely, are so much more dangerous than personal flights, which rarely do this. Oh, wait... In fact, self-flown business flights do not do this routinely, especially in single engine piston aircraft. They are less dangerous than personal flights because the pilots are better trained, the planes are better equipped, and they are not going to kill themselves with low level VFR maneuvers, which is the biggest killer of GA pilots. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:52:31 -0800, "C J Campbell"
wrote: I would hate to have to rely on a handheld GPS in such an emergency, though of course it would be welcome as better than nothing. Actually, it is DRAMATICALLY better than nothing. It is more accurate, more precise, and more reliable than any NDB and most VOR's. NDB, yes. VOR, highly questionable. The fact that a GPS is handheld has little to do with its accuracy. With WAAS enabled, most handhelds are good to 10meters, and all GPS are better than 100m accurate. Throw in the pseudo-HSI displays, and I guarantee I can fly a more accurate emergency approach (assuming the AI is still working ok) with the handheld GPS than I can with an NDB, VOR, or LOC alone. Where the handheld lacks is reliability, influenced by factors like: no RAIM, lack of permanent antenna installations. Having said that, I have flown with a Garmin 295 for 3 or 4 years now, and it is accurate and reliable. Would I launch into IMC with known electrical problems - of course not. However, the odds having having a total electrical failure + G295 failure + Iow IMC are small enough that I believe the risk to flight caused by navigation/electrical failure is much lower than mechanical failure or pilot error. -Nathan |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
"Nathan Young" wrote in message ... On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:52:31 -0800, "C J Campbell" wrote: I would hate to have to rely on a handheld GPS in such an emergency, though of course it would be welcome as better than nothing. Actually, it is DRAMATICALLY better than nothing. It is more accurate, more precise, and more reliable than any NDB and most VOR's. NDB, yes. VOR, highly questionable. The fact that a GPS is handheld has little to do with its accuracy. Where the handheld lacks is reliability Exactly. Moreover, some handhelds are much more reliable than others. Would I launch into IMC with known electrical problems - of course not. Good for you. I suspect some others here would. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
I'd sure like to know who survived a free fall from 20,000 feet without a
parachute. Really, I'm curious. MJC "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... Yes, and people have survived jumping out of the plane without a parachute at 20,000 feet, too. But the odds are against it. Personally, I think the way you deal with an electrical failure in IMC with no GPS or handheld radio is that you avoid putting yourself in a situation where that can happen. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Quite a few he http://www.greenharbor.com/fffolder/wreckage.html
The one I recalled without googling for it was the flight attendant. Doesn't she hold a Guinness world record? On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:27:59 -0600, "MJC" wrote: I'd sure like to know who survived a free fall from 20,000 feet without a parachute. Really, I'm curious. MJC "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... Yes, and people have survived jumping out of the plane without a parachute at 20,000 feet, too. But the odds are against it. Personally, I think the way you deal with an electrical failure in IMC with no GPS or handheld radio is that you avoid putting yourself in a situation where that can happen. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TSA requirement of Security Awareness Training | dancingstar | Piloting | 3 | October 5th 04 02:17 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 05:39 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Alternator failure modes (long) | mikem | Owning | 1 | September 21st 03 07:47 PM |