A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Trap rates for E-2 and C-2 types ?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 24th 03, 02:12 PM
Pechs1
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Trap rates for E-2 and C-2 types ?

John- Do the approach speeds for the E-2 and C-2 types improve the
percentage of traps to bolters compared to fast jets ? Do they tend to
catch the #3 more than jets ? BRBR

No and no...The best jet for me was the F-4 that was one of the fastest on
approach at the time...less time to screw something up...
P. C. Chisholm
CDR, USN(ret.)
Old Phart Phormer Phantom, Turkey, Viper, Scooter and Combat Buckeye Phlyer
  #2  
Old July 25th 03, 06:51 AM
Red Rider
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Pechs1" wrote in message
...
John- Do the approach speeds for the E-2 and C-2 types improve the
percentage of traps to bolters compared to fast jets ? Do they tend to
catch the #3 more than jets ? BRBR

No and no...The best jet for me was the F-4 that was one of the fastest on
approach at the time...less time to screw something up...
P. C. Chisholm
CDR, USN(ret.)
Old Phart Phormer Phantom, Turkey, Viper, Scooter and Combat Buckeye

Phlyer

You have a point there. For me the RA-5 was easy one. Of course you had to
pay attention, and keep your head and a** wired together. I think it was
because of the size and weight. When you had it together, it was just like
sliding down a greased rope. But it and the A-3 kept the flight deck on
their toes.

Red


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Revisiting lapse rates (From: How high is that cloud?) Icebound Instrument Flight Rules 5 November 26th 04 09:41 PM
No More New Fighter Aircraft Types? W. D. Allen Sr. Military Aviation 120 April 18th 04 07:08 AM
Europe squadrons honored for high retention rates Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 January 10th 04 08:14 PM
Most aircraft types flown by 1 pilot? Chad Irby Military Aviation 10 January 7th 04 03:47 AM
they took me back in time and the nsa or japan wired my head and now they know the idea came from me so if your back in time and wounder what happen they change tim liverance history for good. I work at rts wright industries and it a time travel trap tim liverance Military Aviation 0 August 18th 03 12:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.