A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

About the Hiroshima justification threads



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 24th 03, 07:07 PM
Jughead
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default About the Hiroshima justification threads

I haven't wasted even a second bothering to read any of the messages in
those threads, but I just have a couple of questions:

1. Who gives a **** whether or not it was truly justified? What person
living today can say they really had jack **** to do with an executive
decision made nearly 60 years ago?

2. What on earth does a controversial decision made all those years ago
have to do with the present and the future? Seriously...how will truly
knowing whether or not Truman's war-time decisions were justified impact
the lives of individuals living today -- a large number of whom weren't
even alive yet? Heck, my parents weren't even born yet, let alone myself.

When all is said and done, many countries' governments have probably
learned from the experience many years passed to be able to decide on their
own when the use of nukes is and isn't justified. As myself and my
counterparts like to say, "it's above my pay grade". I'm glad I'll never be
the one to have to decide whether or not to attack any other country or
organization with nukes.
  #2  
Old December 24th 03, 09:49 PM
Ed Rasimus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 13:07:33 -0600, Jughead wrote:

I haven't wasted even a second bothering to read any of the messages in
those threads, but I just have a couple of questions:

1. Who gives a **** whether or not it was truly justified? What person
living today can say they really had jack **** to do with an executive
decision made nearly 60 years ago?

2. What on earth does a controversial decision made all those years ago
have to do with the present and the future? Seriously...how will truly
knowing whether or not Truman's war-time decisions were justified impact
the lives of individuals living today -- a large number of whom weren't
even alive yet? Heck, my parents weren't even born yet, let alone myself.

When all is said and done, many countries' governments have probably
learned from the experience many years passed to be able to decide on their
own when the use of nukes is and isn't justified. As myself and my
counterparts like to say, "it's above my pay grade". I'm glad I'll never be
the one to have to decide whether or not to attack any other country or
organization with nukes.



There must be a reason why you choose "Jughead" for your nom de plume.
Maybe you've illustrated it.

Have you read or heard, in any of its convoluted forms, the suggestion
by the philosopher (not the guitarist) Santyana, that "those who will
not learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them"?

If we did not learn what it takes to win a war against a ruthless
enemy and we will confuse morality with indecision, then, we will
revisit the scenario and maybe this time the outcome will be total
loss rather than unconditional surrender.


Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
Smithsonian Institution Press
ISBN #1-58834-103-8
  #3  
Old December 25th 03, 03:01 AM
Steve Hix
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article 2,
Jughead wrote:

I haven't wasted even a second bothering to read any of the messages in
those threads, but I just have a couple of questions:

If you won't extend that much respect to the posters arguing the issue,
why should anyone bother answering your questions?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements me Military Aviation 146 January 15th 04 10:13 PM
Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements) B2431 Military Aviation 100 January 12th 04 01:48 PM
Hiroshima justified? (Invasion should have been attempted at the very least if not carried thru) Greg Moritz Military Aviation 29 December 31st 03 05:56 PM
Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and othermagnificent technological achievements) mrraveltay Military Aviation 7 December 23rd 03 01:01 AM
Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements) Dick Locke Military Aviation 0 December 22nd 03 06:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.