A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

max altitude deviation before bust?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 21st 04, 12:56 AM
Magnus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default max altitude deviation before bust?

I thought it was +/- 200 feet before you've violated if you are flying
IFR, but someone just told me it's a 100 feet, which seems a little
steep considering they use 1000 feet separations.

  #2  
Old March 21st 04, 01:22 AM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It's +/-100 feet, which is a total range for 200 ft.

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
  #3  
Old March 21st 04, 02:44 AM
Richard Hertz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why do you say "a little steep?" Clearly if you understand what is going on
there would not be a question. (assuming US/FAA)

vfr traffic 500 feet above/below
altimeter error allowed - 75 feet.
deviation of 100 feet
deviation of VFR traffic - 100 ft

Add up those errors and you have only 150 ft of separation



"Magnus" wrote in message
...
I thought it was +/- 200 feet before you've violated if you are flying
IFR, but someone just told me it's a 100 feet, which seems a little
steep considering they use 1000 feet separations.



  #4  
Old March 21st 04, 02:55 AM
Capt.Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Teacherjh" wrote in message It's +/-100 feet, which is a total range for
200 ft.


I was taught that it was +/- 300 feet and you violated seperation standards
with another IFR target. What is your reference?

D.


  #5  
Old March 21st 04, 03:07 AM
Magnus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Where can you read about the +/- 100 feet, I couldn't find it in the far-aim.


On 2004-03-20 21:44:58 -0500, "Richard Hertz"
said:

Why do you say "a little steep?" Clearly if you understand what is going on
there would not be a question. (assuming US/FAA)

vfr traffic 500 feet above/below
altimeter error allowed - 75 feet.
deviation of 100 feet
deviation of VFR traffic - 100 ft

Add up those errors and you have only 150 ft of separation


  #6  
Old March 21st 04, 03:16 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Magnus" wrote in message
...

I thought it was +/- 200 feet before you've violated if you are flying
IFR, but someone just told me it's a 100 feet, which seems a little
steep considering they use 1000 feet separations.


Depends what you mean by "violated". If your Mode C altitude is within 200
feet of your reported altitude you're considered to be on altitude.



  #7  
Old March 21st 04, 03:16 AM
Teacherjh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Teacherjh" wrote in message
It's +/-100 feet, which is a total range for
200 ft. [for IFR flight tolerances]


I was taught that it was +/- 300 feet and you violated seperation standards
with another IFR target. What is your reference?


It's what I was taught. I think it's also in the PTS for instrument flight
(though I don't have one handy). I haven't found it in a printed reference.

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)
  #8  
Old March 21st 04, 03:22 AM
Robert Moore
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Richard Hertz" wrote
Add up those errors and you have only 150 ft of separation


When is IFR traffic required to have separation from VFR?

Bob Moore
  #9  
Old March 21st 04, 04:15 AM
Magnus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That's exactly what I'm talking about. My understanding was that if you
have been cleared to maintain 3000 feet, and you dip down for example
past 2800' then it's a violation. A friend heard that it's actually 100
feet, which would incur a violation passing 2900 feet going by my
previous example.

Is there some reliable source of information where this info can be found?

On 2004-03-20 22:16:00 -0500, "Steven P. McNicoll"
said:


Depends what you mean by "violated". If your Mode C altitude is within 200
feet of your reported altitude you're considered to be on altitude.



  #10  
Old March 21st 04, 04:20 AM
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ATC radar's (at least they used to when I was working them) show you on
"assigned altitude" when you are within +/-200ft.. so if you are assigned
9000 it will say "90C"... if you are still climbing to that altitude it will
say 90 "up-arrow" 87, or 8700 climbing to 9000 assigned.

the "traffic alert" on the ATC system is geared to the 90C, if you are at
9300 it will show 90 "arrow" 93 and if there is a traffic conflict at 10,000
it will "alert" the controller.

Then he may "bust you", but if it's a momentary deviation and no other
traffic is involved, the controller may query and ask your altitude to
verify that his read out is correct. If you say, level 90, Then he may offer
up a new altimeter setting to you, or just tell you that he sees 9300, as a
hint that he is watching, or that you need to get it looked at. If your
altimeter setting is not set to "local", his computer radar will
misinterpret the altitude ModeC information from your aircraft.

All controllers verify altitude readouts on the radar display on initial
contact, whether you call in, "out of 8500 for 9000" or, "level 9000", he
compares to what he sees on his data. If you do not offer up an altitude, or
in the case of an "IFR pickup" in the air, he will ask altitude leaving or
verify alt so he can compare his data.

BT

"Magnus" wrote in message
...
I thought it was +/- 200 feet before you've violated if you are flying
IFR, but someone just told me it's a 100 feet, which seems a little
steep considering they use 1000 feet separations.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Catastrophic Decompression; Small Place Solo Aviation Piloting 193 January 13th 04 08:52 PM
GPS Altitude with WAAS Phil Verghese Instrument Flight Rules 42 October 5th 03 12:39 AM
GPS Altitude with WAAS Phil Verghese Piloting 38 October 5th 03 12:39 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.