If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
70K ft altitude record
So what happened to the 70K+ altitude record? I sure hope it
gets submitted to IGC. In order to deny the claim, they'll have to assert that the recorded GPS altitude has some validity. Once that door is opened there's an excellent, forced study of just how valid it is if it's used as the basis for denial... I hope it is submitted officially. I'd love to hear more about this... -- ------------+ Mark Boyd Avenal, California, USA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Mark James Boyd wrote:
So what happened to the 70K+ altitude record? I sure hope it gets submitted to IGC. In order to deny the claim, they'll have to assert that the recorded GPS altitude has some validity. It's "validity" has never been denied. It's included in the recordings of all IGC approved recorders because it is a useful measurement. What's at issue is it's use as the _only_ altitude measurement, and in place of the traditional measurement. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
So what does "validity" mean in practice? If the GPS altitude and
pressure altitude differ, the lower of the two is the "record?" What's at issue before its use as the *only* altitude measurement is if it is a better altitude measurement, also. Anyway, I'd just like to see the letter officially denying the claim. Eric Greenwell wrote: Mark James Boyd wrote: So what happened to the 70K+ altitude record? I sure hope it gets submitted to IGC. In order to deny the claim, they'll have to assert that the recorded GPS altitude has some validity. It's "validity" has never been denied. It's included in the recordings of all IGC approved recorders because it is a useful measurement. What's at issue is it's use as the _only_ altitude measurement, and in place of the traditional measurement. -- ------------+ Mark Boyd Avenal, California, USA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Mark James Boyd wrote:
So what does "validity" mean in practice? If the GPS altitude and pressure altitude differ, the lower of the two is the "record?" Altitude records are (under the current Sporting Code) determined only by the recorded pressure altitude. If the flight data file is seen to have significant discrepancies between the recorded GPS and pressure altitudes, it would be more carefully scrutinized by the record data analysts. If there is still reason to doubt the validity of the recorded pressure altitude, the record claim would be denied. Marc |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Pressure Altitude and Terminology | Icebound | Piloting | 0 | November 27th 04 09:14 PM |
What's minimum safe O2 level? | PaulH | Piloting | 29 | November 9th 04 07:35 PM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Instrument Flight Rules | 42 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |
GPS Altitude with WAAS | Phil Verghese | Piloting | 38 | October 5th 03 12:39 AM |