If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
New theory of flight released Sept 2004
The current theory of flight is based upon the Bernoulli's Principal, the
pressure of a fluid (liquid or gas) decreases at points where the speed of the fluid increases. The airfoil is designed to increase the velocity of the airflow above its surface, thereby decreasing pressure above the airfoil. Simultaneously, the impact of the air on the lower surface of the airfoil increases the pressure below. This combination of pressure decrease above and increase below produces lift. Pressure is reduced due to the smaller space the air has above the wing than below. Air cannot go through the wing, so it must push around it. The surface air molecules push between the wing and outer layers of air. Due to the bump of the airfoil, the space is smaller and the molecules must go faster. THIS HAS A MAJOR PROBLEM - specifically inverted flight. The current theory of flight utilizing the Bernoulli's Principal is only applicable to normal level flight. However, we know and observe that inverted flight is possible. Thus, the Bernoulli's Principal is no longer applicable to inverted flight, so there must be another theory that supports flight, be it level or inverted. The new theory of flight is based upon the new theory of Gravitational Vector Force (released Sept 2004). Utilizing Newton's laws that equal opposite force is generated at right angles, be it applied at once or successively, and if the angle is oblique (slanted) a new force is generated. Then inverted flight is possible as force is always generated at right angles, and this is towards the ground in all cases. The net difference between the initial velocity and resistance force generated at the leading edge at right angles (downwards) creates a new force called Gravitational Vector Force, and it travels in the opposite direction (upwards) to maintain balance, impacting the bottom of the wing. The wing becomes less efficient in inverted flight due to the design of the airfoil, however it is still possible. This new theory of flight also supports the following; 1) the new force manifests at a faster rate than initial velocity, hence the wing becomes more efficient at faster speeds 2) As you extend spoilers and flaps at the leading and trailing edges, the bottom of the wing now becomes "cupped" like a satellite dish, and able to capture more Gravitational Vector Force, creating more lift You may read more about this new theory at www.threexd.com Mark Oliver |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 10:49:58 -0400, "Mark Oliver"
wrote in :: The new theory of flight is based upon the new theory of Gravitational Vector Force (released Sept 2004). Was this theory formerly held captive? Who released it? This subject has been discussed in depth in this newsgroup over the years: http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q...ting&lr=&hl=en |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Well, you're on the right newsgroup anyway. Have fun with this one. I
think I'll just sit back and watch :-)) All the best to you, Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Flight Instructor/Aerobatics/Retired "Mark Oliver" wrote in message . .. The current theory of flight is based upon the Bernoulli's Principal, the pressure of a fluid (liquid or gas) decreases at points where the speed of the fluid increases. The airfoil is designed to increase the velocity of the airflow above its surface, thereby decreasing pressure above the airfoil. Simultaneously, the impact of the air on the lower surface of the airfoil increases the pressure below. This combination of pressure decrease above and increase below produces lift. Pressure is reduced due to the smaller space the air has above the wing than below. Air cannot go through the wing, so it must push around it. The surface air molecules push between the wing and outer layers of air. Due to the bump of the airfoil, the space is smaller and the molecules must go faster. THIS HAS A MAJOR PROBLEM - specifically inverted flight. The current theory of flight utilizing the Bernoulli's Principal is only applicable to normal level flight. However, we know and observe that inverted flight is possible. Thus, the Bernoulli's Principal is no longer applicable to inverted flight, so there must be another theory that supports flight, be it level or inverted. The new theory of flight is based upon the new theory of Gravitational Vector Force (released Sept 2004). Utilizing Newton's laws that equal opposite force is generated at right angles, be it applied at once or successively, and if the angle is oblique (slanted) a new force is generated. Then inverted flight is possible as force is always generated at right angles, and this is towards the ground in all cases. The net difference between the initial velocity and resistance force generated at the leading edge at right angles (downwards) creates a new force called Gravitational Vector Force, and it travels in the opposite direction (upwards) to maintain balance, impacting the bottom of the wing. The wing becomes less efficient in inverted flight due to the design of the airfoil, however it is still possible. This new theory of flight also supports the following; 1) the new force manifests at a faster rate than initial velocity, hence the wing becomes more efficient at faster speeds 2) As you extend spoilers and flaps at the leading and trailing edges, the bottom of the wing now becomes "cupped" like a satellite dish, and able to capture more Gravitational Vector Force, creating more lift You may read more about this new theory at www.threexd.com Mark Oliver |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Howdy!
In article , Mark Oliver wrote (from another space-time continuum): [snip intro that actually passes the smell test] THIS HAS A MAJOR PROBLEM - specifically inverted flight. The current theory of flight utilizing the Bernoulli's Principal is only applicable to normal level flight. However, we know and observe that inverted flight is possible. Thus, the Bernoulli's Principal is no longer applicable to inverted flight, so there must be another theory that supports flight, be it level or inverted. That is a fascinating claim -- one that bespeaks access to the good drugs. You should share them. [snip exposition of material that shows Mark isn't wearing his tinfoil beanie] yours, Michael -- Michael and MJ Houghton | Herveus d'Ormonde and Megan O'Donnelly | White Wolf and the Phoenix Bowie, MD, USA | Tablet and Inkle bands, and other stuff | http://www.radix.net/~herveus/wwap/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Mark Oliver" wrote: [snip "interesting" lift ideas] When you get through with this one, how about explaining the effect of downwind turns to us? -- Dan C-172RG at BFM |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bernoulli sucks. The wing lifts because air pushes on one side
and not the other. "Mark Oliver" wrote in message . .. The current theory of flight is based upon the Bernoulli's Principal, the pressure of a fluid (liquid or gas) decreases at points where the speed of the fluid increases. The airfoil is designed to increase the velocity of the airflow above its surface, thereby decreasing pressure above the airfoil. Simultaneously, the impact of the air on the lower surface of the airfoil increases the pressure below. This combination of pressure decrease above and increase below produces lift. Pressure is reduced due to the smaller space the air has above the wing than below. Air cannot go through the wing, so it must push around it. The surface air molecules push between the wing and outer layers of air. Due to the bump of the airfoil, the space is smaller and the molecules must go faster. THIS HAS A MAJOR PROBLEM - specifically inverted flight. The current theory of flight utilizing the Bernoulli's Principal is only applicable to normal level flight. However, we know and observe that inverted flight is possible. Thus, the Bernoulli's Principal is no longer applicable to inverted flight, so there must be another theory that supports flight, be it level or inverted. The new theory of flight is based upon the new theory of Gravitational Vector Force (released Sept 2004). Utilizing Newton's laws that equal opposite force is generated at right angles, be it applied at once or successively, and if the angle is oblique (slanted) a new force is generated. Then inverted flight is possible as force is always generated at right angles, and this is towards the ground in all cases. The net difference between the initial velocity and resistance force generated at the leading edge at right angles (downwards) creates a new force called Gravitational Vector Force, and it travels in the opposite direction (upwards) to maintain balance, impacting the bottom of the wing. The wing becomes less efficient in inverted flight due to the design of the airfoil, however it is still possible. This new theory of flight also supports the following; 1) the new force manifests at a faster rate than initial velocity, hence the wing becomes more efficient at faster speeds 2) As you extend spoilers and flaps at the leading and trailing edges, the bottom of the wing now becomes "cupped" like a satellite dish, and able to capture more Gravitational Vector Force, creating more lift You may read more about this new theory at www.threexd.com Mark Oliver |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Mark Oliver wrote:
The current theory of flight is based upon the Bernoulli's Principal, the No it's not! Do not stress old Bernoulli. His findings are restricted to the flowing media only. You can use the _some_ of his laws to find the forces caused by the air on the structure of the airplane. In fact the "real" cause for an airplane to stay up is inertia and friction of the air. Please see some new publications on aerodynamics (past 1980') to get an idea on how that works. (You might want to dust of Your knowledge about differential equations.) THIS HAS A MAJOR PROBLEM - specifically inverted flight. The current theory of flight utilizing the Bernoulli's Principal is only applicable to normal level flight. However, we know and observe that inverted flight is Once again if You want to find what the moving air is doing Bernoulli is fine. And if You do some experimenting, like I did, You will find there is no dependence from the direction. The new theory of flight is based upon the new theory of Gravitational Vector Force (released Sept 2004). Utilizing Newton's laws that equal opposite force is generated at right angles, be it applied at once or What Newton was that? Can You cite any document from Mister Newton? 2) As you extend spoilers and flaps at the leading and trailing edges, the bottom of the wing now becomes "cupped" like a satellite dish, and able to capture more Gravitational Vector Force, creating more lift The paragraph above says that a prop can not produce any thrust when heading straight down? I haven't ever done that but I guess some of the Aerobatics guys around here can prove You wrong on this point. And one last statement: There is no "Universal Balance" anywhere (like there is no "Earth in the Balance"). There is either Stability or Transformation. Prove me wrong on _that_ if You can! I keep flying with my old friend Bernoulli and his brother until then.... -- Remove the cork to Reply by e-Mail. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Mark Oliver" wrote in message . .. The current theory of flight is based upon the Bernoulli's Principal, the pressure of a fluid (liquid or gas) decreases at points where the speed of the fluid increases. The airfoil is designed to increase the velocity of the airflow above its surface, thereby decreasing pressure above the airfoil. Simultaneously, the impact of the air on the lower surface of the airfoil increases the pressure below. This combination of pressure decrease above and increase below produces lift. Pressure is reduced due to the smaller space the air has above the wing than below. Air cannot go through the wing, so it must push around it. The surface air molecules push between the wing and outer layers of air. Due to the bump of the airfoil, the space is smaller and the molecules must go faster. THIS HAS A MAJOR PROBLEM - specifically inverted flight. The current theory of flight utilizing the Bernoulli's Principal is only applicable to normal level flight. However, we know and observe that inverted flight is possible. Thus, the Bernoulli's Principal is no longer applicable to inverted flight, so there must be another theory that supports flight, be it level or inverted. The new theory of flight is based upon the new theory of Gravitational Vector Force (released Sept 2004). Utilizing Newton's laws that equal opposite force is generated at right angles, be it applied at once or successively, and if the angle is oblique (slanted) a new force is generated. Then inverted flight is possible as force is always generated at right angles, and this is towards the ground in all cases. The net difference between the initial velocity and resistance force generated at the leading edge at right angles (downwards) creates a new force called Gravitational Vector Force, and it travels in the opposite direction (upwards) to maintain balance, impacting the bottom of the wing. The wing becomes less efficient in inverted flight due to the design of the airfoil, however it is still possible. This new theory of flight also supports the following; 1) the new force manifests at a faster rate than initial velocity, hence the wing becomes more efficient at faster speeds 2) As you extend spoilers and flaps at the leading and trailing edges, the bottom of the wing now becomes "cupped" like a satellite dish, and able to capture more Gravitational Vector Force, creating more lift You may read more about this new theory at www.threexd.com Mark Oliver Ok what happens when you remove gravity and air? now that space flight is within the reach of civilian man. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Todd Pattist" wrote in message ... "Dudley Henriques" wrote: Well, you're on the right newsgroup anyway. Have fun with this one. I think I'll just sit back and watch :-)) That's what I decided to do too :-) Where do these guys COME from????? :-)))) Dudley |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Here I am, popping up as usual whenever lift is mentioned. Dudley's saying
right now, "Uh, oh, here we go again." This gravitational lift vector is one of the most misunderstood forces in physics and misconceptions about it in media just won't die. IT HAS NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH GRAVITATIONAL ATTRACTION. The forces this theory refer to are a field of time space reality distortion that is being project "towards" us in a fourth dimensional fashion from aliens that inhabit the parallel universe that exists slightly separated from ours by differing alignment of the string particles that compose the various universes inhabiting what we think of as space we are alone in. Don't get fooled by over simplifications of the reality around you. The web site for this theory does just as much of a dis-service to the aliens (they aren't really aliens because they are actually right next to us and have been her all along) as the popular lift explanations do to Bernoulli and Newton. -- Roger Long |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
new theory of flight released Sept 2004 | Mark Oliver | Aerobatics | 1 | October 5th 04 10:20 PM |
ramifications of new TSA rules on all non-US and US citizen pilots | paul k. sanchez | Piloting | 19 | September 27th 04 11:49 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Home Built | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:16 PM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |