If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, "Tarver
Engineering" confessed the following: Why did you suppose Jay Gould created his 1300 page band aid? Asked and answered...Gould was a prolific writer, he was trying to educate and entertain that is why one particular work was 1474 pages long. Why is Stephen Wolfram's "A New Kind of Science" 1100+ pages long? Answer: 200 pages was insufficient. Jay Gould's 1300 page band aid is an admission that Darwin's origin of species through evolution does not happen. Really? I missed that in the preface, I'll go back to the library and look for that admission. Guess the book could have been a magazine article then. The hard physical geological evidence discredited Darwin's fairy tale... JT, sincerely I have no opposition to looking at the evidence you keep referencing. For all I know you could be using the biblical flood myth as your cite. Honest, cite for me...let me be the skeptic to your claim. And just so you understand, I have ZERO problem with your skepticism (denial) of biological evolution, I'm simply trying to get you to cough up your evidence. For me (and biologists, paleontologists, geologists etc) evolution and natural selection offer the BEST, most logical explanation, based upon the evidence gathered thus far. By the 1930s quantum physics had proven that a vacuum fluctuation might very well be Creation, from a human perspective. This is an interesting statement. If not from human perspective (we are human afterall) what other perspective would you reference (in realtivistic terms)...I'm currently watching the relativity/quantum physics lectures by Richard Wolfson PhD. Cosmology has tabbed on to some quantum origin of the universe, as there are big problems with the big bang. Hubble has provided photographic evidence that the genesis of the universe is an ongoing process. Considering the time it has taken the light to reach the Hubble telescope, the redshift currently noted (expansion) can be in the past or the "elsewhere". The universe could be contracting at the edges by now, but our sun will have gone supernova (more than likely) by the time the light (evidence) reaches our part of the galaxy. Of course Prof Wolfson could be fabricating that. So onward marches the Church of Darwin, in denile over all of science having moved on from their dog breeder science. Sorry JT, it would appear that ALL OF SCIENCE has not gotten the memo that Darwin's theory has been disproven (and replaced by a BETTER model). It all goes to a lack of supporting evidence, to say nothing of some ulterior motive you seem to be placing on proponents of evolution. Why would a "darwinian evolutionist" (as a label for discussion) object to adopting a better explanation? There is no reward to clinging to a disproven theory. That is illogical. Bottom line...I have nothing further to dispute your claims of geological evidence. Nor do I understand how you have mentioned spurts (for lack of better word) of biological change (which incidently sounds a great deal like Gould's notion of Punctuated Equilibrium) and said that natural selection is viable, but say evolution does not occur. I finally figured out your reference to Sanger had something to do with social Darwinism and eugenics. Allow me to point out that the abuse/application of science does not nullify the science. IOW, Nazi claims about dirty jews and arayan superiority or KKK attitudes toward blacks does not nullify evolution. Juvat |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush's guard record | JDKAHN | Home Built | 13 | October 3rd 04 09:38 PM |
"W" is JFK's son and Bush revenge killed Kennedy in 1963 | Ross C. Bubba Nicholson | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 28th 04 11:30 AM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |