If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Shear Pins for Propellors?
Back when I was growing up on the farm, we used several powered
implements that received their power from the tractor through a power take-off assembly. Somewhere on the device's power train, between the PTO take-off and the "business end" of the apparatus, there was always either a belt-drive or a coupling fitted with a "shear" pin. Both of these systems were intended to protect that tractor (and the implement) by failing if the implement bit off more than it could handle. This morning, while driving past the airport on my way to work, the thought occured to me that a shear pin could be used to protect airplane engines (at least partially) from prop strikes. My understanding is that the props on light singles (at least) are connected directly to the engine's drive shaft. Recognizing that this issue is driven as much by regulation as by anything, I'm wondering if there would be any benefit to using shear pins in these systems. Would it reduce the need for a complete (or partial) tear-down after a prop strike? Would there be any benefit for more complex propeller arrangements? Any thoughts? Rich Lemert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Rich Lemert" wrote in message
link.net... [...] This morning, while driving past the airport on my way to work, the thought occured to me that a shear pin could be used to protect airplane engines (at least partially) from prop strikes. Frankly, having the prop keep moving is so much more important than protecting the engine in the event of a prop strike, I can't imagine anyone accepting the additional potential failure mode of a bad shear pin. We seem to have a hard enough time making the crankshafts right. Note that in a tractor, you are much more likely to suffer a sudden stoppage, and the consequences for the premature breaking of a shear pin are dramatically less. It seems to make much more sense for that application. My understanding is that the props on light singles (at least) are connected directly to the engine's drive shaft. That's true of almost every propeller driven airplane. There are exceptions, of course, mostly related to geared engine installations (found on singles and twins). Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Rich Lemert" wrote in message link.net... This morning, while driving past the airport on my way to work, the thought occured to me that a shear pin could be used to protect airplane engines (at least partially) from prop strikes. I have also had shear pins fail for no good reason. Aviation thinks that designing in another point of failure is a bad thing. -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Morgans" wrote in message ... "Rich Lemert" wrote in message link.net... This morning, while driving past the airport on my way to work, the thought occured to me that a shear pin could be used to protect airplane engines (at least partially) from prop strikes. I have also had shear pins fail for no good reason. Aviation thinks that designing in another point of failure is a bad thing. -- Jim in NC Don't some of the Rotax engines have a shear point to protect the engine? I believe most vacum pumps have a Shear Wafer to protect the engine WHEN... not IF the pump fails as well. But have ot agree that I'd rather have to tear down an engine after a propstrike... than have the pin fail in flight... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
In article .net,
Rich Lemert wrote: Recognizing that this issue is driven as much by regulation as by anything, I'm wondering if there would be any benefit to using shear pins in these systems. Would it reduce the need for a complete (or partial) tear-down after a prop strike? Would there be any benefit for more complex propeller arrangements? Any thoughts? I think the best protection for the engine would be to not land gearup, taxi into super soft stuff, or do any of the other things that cause prop strikes. G -- Dale L. Falk There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing around with airplanes. http://home.gci.net/~sncdfalk/flying.html |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Rich Lemert" wrote in message link.net... Back when I was growing up on the farm, we used several powered implements that received their power from the tractor through a power take-off assembly. Somewhere on the device's power train, between the PTO take-off and the "business end" of the apparatus, there was always either a belt-drive or a coupling fitted with a "shear" pin. Both of these systems were intended to protect that tractor (and the implement) by failing if the implement bit off more than it could handle. This morning, while driving past the airport on my way to work, the thought occured to me that a shear pin could be used to protect airplane engines (at least partially) from prop strikes. My understanding is that the props on light singles (at least) are connected directly to the engine's drive shaft. Recognizing that this issue is driven as much by regulation as by anything, I'm wondering if there would be any benefit to using shear pins in these systems. Would it reduce the need for a complete (or partial) tear-down after a prop strike? Would there be any benefit for more complex propeller arrangements? Any thoughts? Rich Lemert Sounds to me like an idea worth pursuing. Could have two shear pins, with visually checkable integrity during preflight inspection, to counter the problem of one failing. John Lowry Flight Physics |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"John T Lowry" wrote in message k.net... "Rich Lemert" wrote in message link.net... Back when I was growing up on the farm, we used several powered implements that received their power from the tractor through a power take-off assembly. Somewhere on the device's power train, between the PTO take-off and the "business end" of the apparatus, there was always either a belt-drive or a coupling fitted with a "shear" pin. Both of these systems were intended to protect that tractor (and the implement) by failing if the implement bit off more than it could handle. This morning, while driving past the airport on my way to work, the thought occured to me that a shear pin could be used to protect airplane engines (at least partially) from prop strikes. My understanding is that the props on light singles (at least) are connected directly to the engine's drive shaft. Recognizing that this issue is driven as much by regulation as by anything, I'm wondering if there would be any benefit to using shear pins in these systems. Would it reduce the need for a complete (or partial) tear-down after a prop strike? Would there be any benefit for more complex propeller arrangements? Any thoughts? Rich Lemert Sounds to me like an idea worth pursuing. Could have two shear pins, with visually checkable integrity during preflight inspection, to counter the problem of one failing. John Lowry Flight Physics Now you have added two additional points of failure. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Now you have added two additional points of failure.
I'm sure Lycoming would be glad to pursue this, especially in light of their recent failures in court. Not. Too bad, it's got merit. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On 2005-04-01 04:32, Rich Lemert wrote:
Back when I was growing up on the farm, we used several powered implements that received their power from the tractor through a power take-off assembly. Somewhere on the device's power train, between the PTO take-off and the "business end" of the apparatus, there was always either a belt-drive or a coupling fitted with a "shear" pin. Both of these systems were intended to protect that tractor (and the implement) by failing if the implement bit off more than it could handle. This morning, while driving past the airport on my way to work, the thought occured to me that a shear pin could be used to protect airplane engines (at least partially) from prop strikes. My understanding is that the props on light singles (at least) are connected directly to the engine's drive shaft. Recognizing that this issue is driven as much by regulation as by anything, I'm wondering if there would be any benefit to using shear pins in these systems. Would it reduce the need for a complete (or partial) tear-down after a prop strike? Would there be any benefit for more complex propeller arrangements? Any thoughts? Rich Lemert Hmm...I think this would mean a weakening of the shaft. And how would it be inspected at preflight, as was suggested? Maybe there could be a market for a protective skid, something like the Avro 504K, if prop strikes are a common occurrence? /Rolf |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Rotax certified engines use a "slipper clutch" system to help protect the
crankshaft and gear box. It isn't a shear pin system, but rather a spring loaded ramp-toothed afair that resets. Rotax has criteria for strikes that still require teardown of the gearbox and/or the entire engine. tom I'm wondering if there would be any benefit to using shear pins in these systems. Rich Lemert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Newbie question on trailering Setup | joe | Soaring | 11 | December 26th 04 11:10 PM |
sound of wind shear | Dan Jacobson | General Aviation | 2 | May 11th 04 11:43 PM |
IPAQ Wiring - which pins are used | Michael | Soaring | 9 | March 15th 04 08:48 PM |
Amazing Wind Shear Today | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 25 | December 3rd 03 10:23 PM |
taper pins | Ernest Christley | Home Built | 4 | September 12th 03 03:15 AM |