If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
I can't believe that the documentation for the Silver flight made you leave
Soaring. A barograph trace or a picture of the field as you circled it would have proven the flight. The flight back with it's challenges is what keeps people in Soaring, they want the challenge and it is different on every day. I know a lot of people that fly alot and never got their badges, but they still enjoy the beauty and the challenge of using energy from Mother Nature to sustain a flight. In my personal opinion, cross country experience should be required of any CFIG so that you can prepare the students for all phases of Soaring, just my 2 cents worth. Next time you are droning across the sky in the rented power plane, keep looking at the clouds and wondering if I was in a glider could I get from here to there. Fly safely, Fred "Michael" wrote in message om... Pete Brown wrote Let's keep a bit of perspective. These badges are primarily a record of personal achievement, very little more. Well, not quite. For one thing, they are used as a prerequisite for entering contests. For another, lots of people seem determined to prevent 'dilution' of the accomplishment, for whatever reason. Some mention insurance, but I've never had an insurer inquire about my badges. I don't have a Silver badge. I suppose that had I been more concerned with documenting rather than flying I might. I didn't own a logger, or a barograph for that matter, but my club had barographs and I'm certain that had I asked, I could have borrowed one. I know, because I remember seeing a pilot trying to get a barograph to work and filling in paperwork while I was getting ready to make a flight. It didn't look like fun. See, that's what flying is about for me - having fun. I flew to a nearby (60 km) field, but that didn't seem like much of a challenge. At that point I was glad I hadn't bothered with a barograph, because I decided to turn around and come home. I knew there was a way to make the flight count anyway, with a turnpoint camera and a barograph, but the last time someone tried to explain how that worked to me, my eyes glazed over. I guess I wasn't up to the challenge. Getting home, fighting a 30kt headwind in a metal ship, almost landing out - THAT was a challenge. I'm really glad I made that flight - it taught me things about soaring that no book can teach. I wrote about that flight for this newsgroup when it happened. Soon thereafter, I heard there was going to be a local contest. I knew I had no chance of winning, but I considered entering anyway, just for the experience. I was thinking about getting my glider instructor rating, and I felt that flying in a contest was something I ought to experience. Certainly participating in a skydiving competition is required to become a skydiving instructor, and I always thought the requirement was a good one. Turned out I needed a Silver badge. It was kind of amusing, because another pilot was dead set on entering the contest. Like me, he had already flown a qualifying flight, and unlike me he actually attempted to document it - but something had gone wrong with the documentation and he needed to redo it. The day was marginal, but he declared the flight, saying that he would either get his Silver that day or land out. He landed out. I believe he eventually got the SSA to accept his original documentation and entered the contest. He was persistent. I guess I wasn't. I never did enter a contest. I eventually got my glider instructor rating and taught some. I still fly a great deal, but mostly in power. Less hassle, more fun. I still teach too, but also mostly in power. I just finished teaching a glider pilot to fly instruments. He also doesn't have a Silver badge, even though he has made more than one qualifying flight. He doesn't fly gliders anymore either. But hey, I'm sure keeping guys like us out is a small price to pay for maintaining the integrity of the badge system. After all, if we were truly serious, we would have overcome the obstacles. I'm sure soaring is better off without us. Michael |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
|
#153
|
|||
|
|||
"f.blair" wrote
I can't believe that the documentation for the Silver flight made you leave Soaring. It didn't. But see, had I gone to the contest and gotten hooked, I might still be soaring regularly. What made me leave? There was a higher fun/challenge to hassle ratio in other forrms of aviation. The documentation was just one of the hassles - there were many others. I know many, many glider-rated pilots who are still flying regularly - just not in gliders. Those are ALL people with the time, money, and desire to fly who gave soaring a shot - and were not retained. The flight back with it's challenges is what keeps people in Soaring You're right. Some people are dedicated enought that they stay in despite the hassles. In my personal opinion, cross country experience should be required of any CFIG so that you can prepare the students for all phases of Soaring, just my 2 cents worth. And I agree with you. In fact, it IS required most places. In the UK, the Silver is required before you can instruct at any level. When I found that out, I put my CFIG training on hold until I met the requirement. I guess I was of the opinion that what counted was making the flight, not the documentation. I'm not so sure anymore. Next time you are droning across the sky in the rented power plane, keep looking at the clouds and wondering if I was in a glider could I get from here to there. There is much, much more to power flying than what you describe. It has its own challenges. Sure, droning along in a rental Cherokee on a blue sky day isn't much of a challenge. In fact, if that were my only other option, I would still be soaring, in spite of the hassles. In power as in soaring, doing the fun stuff generally requires that you become an owner. Go cross the Gulf of Mexico sometime (in a twin, of course) in and out of cloud, dodging T-storms by a combination of visual and electronic references, and top it off with a landing on a 2700x20 strip in the Florida Keys with a built-in 20kt crosswind - then tell me about challenge. Michael |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
All,
Michael makes two very salient points: 1. The hassel to fun ratio is very high in soaring. 2. You can have a lot of fun flying an airplane. In addition, the hassel factor is , in most cases, much lower. I add a couple of my own; 3. There is little cost difference. 4. There is very little seasonal variation in usefulness, that is, you can power fly all year round. 5. No SSA politics and a generally friendlier bunch at the airport as opposed to the glider operation. All that said, I'm back in a glider after a 20 year lay off. Cheers!, Pete "Michael" wrote in message om... "f.blair" wrote I can't believe that the documentation for the Silver flight made you leave Soaring. It didn't. But see, had I gone to the contest and gotten hooked, I might still be soaring regularly. What made me leave? There was a higher fun/challenge to hassle ratio in other forrms of aviation. The documentation was just one of the hassles - there were many others. I know many, many glider-rated pilots who are still flying regularly - just not in gliders. Those are ALL people with the time, money, and desire to fly who gave soaring a shot - and were not retained. The flight back with it's challenges is what keeps people in Soaring You're right. Some people are dedicated enought that they stay in despite the hassles. In my personal opinion, cross country experience should be required of any CFIG so that you can prepare the students for all phases of Soaring, just my 2 cents worth. And I agree with you. In fact, it IS required most places. In the UK, the Silver is required before you can instruct at any level. When I found that out, I put my CFIG training on hold until I met the requirement. I guess I was of the opinion that what counted was making the flight, not the documentation. I'm not so sure anymore. Next time you are droning across the sky in the rented power plane, keep looking at the clouds and wondering if I was in a glider could I get from here to there. There is much, much more to power flying than what you describe. It has its own challenges. Sure, droning along in a rental Cherokee on a blue sky day isn't much of a challenge. In fact, if that were my only other option, I would still be soaring, in spite of the hassles. In power as in soaring, doing the fun stuff generally requires that you become an owner. Go cross the Gulf of Mexico sometime (in a twin, of course) in and out of cloud, dodging T-storms by a combination of visual and electronic references, and top it off with a landing on a 2700x20 strip in the Florida Keys with a built-in 20kt crosswind - then tell me about challenge. Michael |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Pete Reinhart
writes All, Michael makes two very salient points: 1. The hassel to fun ratio is very high in soaring. Not if you have a share in a motor glider. Including self-sustainers of course, including Schempp's Turbos. Anyway, when there was hassle on gliding fields in my youth, that did not put me off. mending cable breaks was all too common, soaring was not. It is the other way round nowadays, fortunately. But I am a lifelong fanatic, which others obviously are not. Soaring is always challenging but some times it may not be fun when you are about to land in some nasty field a long way fro base. Hence my long-term addiction to having an "outboard engine" like the small sailing boats I used to crew for ..... -- Ian Strachan Lasham Gliding Centre, UK |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |