Fine example of Tarver Engineering release for service

"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...

Yes, I'm just a nice guy. :-)

You do have that going for you so far.

Your ignorance of pitot static systems is typical, however.

Tarver Engineering wrote:
"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...


Yes, I'm just a nice guy. :-)


You do have that going for you so far.

Your ignorance of pitot static systems is typical, however.

Yes, it seems to match yours, so I guess two of us makes it qualify as
typical. :-)

Matt

"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...
Tarver Engineering wrote:
"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...


Yes, I'm just a nice guy. :-)


You do have that going for you so far.

Your ignorance of pitot static systems is typical, however.

Yes, it seems to match yours, so I guess two of us makes it qualify as
typical. :-)

I thought you were disagreeing with me based on ignorance.

Tarver Engineering wrote:
"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...

Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...



Yes, I'm just a nice guy. :-)


You do have that going for you so far.

Your ignorance of pitot static systems is typical, however.

Yes, it seems to match yours, so I guess two of us makes it qualify as
typical. :-)


I thought you were disagreeing with me based on ignorance.



I was. I didn't think you'd admit your ignorance though. Bravo!

Matt

"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...
Tarver Engineering wrote:
"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...

Tarver Engineering wrote:

"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...



Yes, I'm just a nice guy. :-)


You do have that going for you so far.

Your ignorance of pitot static systems is typical, however.

Yes, it seems to match yours, so I guess two of us makes it qualify as
typical. :-)

I thought you were disagreeing with me based on ignorance.

I was.

That is what makes you a nice guy.

JL Grasso wrote:

"Scott M. Kozel" wrote:
JL Grasso wrote:
"Scott M. Kozel" wrote:
JL Grasso wrote:
"Tarver Engineering" wrote:

The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts out of
a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.

Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!

Keyboard!

Thank tarver!

I've spewed soda on at least a dozen keyboards, from reading Splappy's posts.

Same here. I think it's time for a class action suit to recoup some
keyboard money!

Keyboard! (but primarily Splappy's fault)

Rich Ahrens wrote in message si.com...
Matthew S. Whiting wrote:

JL Grasso wrote:

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:25:26 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"

wrote:


The whole point of using a static port is to be able to take the guts
out of
a pitot tube and produce only pitot pressure, thus increasing the
reliability of the system.



Bwaaaaahwahwahwahwahwahwahwahwah3wahw!

Jerry


Yes, those static ports are pretty unreliable! :-)

All those moving parts...

keyboard !

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
...

Can you just imagine how long the tech course must be?...

A pitot tube is a fairly delicate instrument.

like your sobriety ?

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Matthew S. Whiting" wrote in message
...

No, you have trouble writing things that make sense. What is unreliable
about a pitot tube? The heater is likely the least reliable part.
Which airplane(s) have pitot ports? I don't think I've seen one. What
makes them more reliable?

I have no interest.


got that bir right!

"running with scissors" wrote in
message om...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...
"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
...

Can you just imagine how long the tech course must be?...

A pitot tube is a fairly delicate instrument.

like your sobriety ?

And in the next message he shows what a brick brain you are.