If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: What it took to get wings in WW II. From: "Lawrence Dillard" "ArtKramr" wrote in message dd upSubject: What it took to get wings in WW II. From: (Walt BJ) BTW, Art, I graduated from Aviation Cadet Class 54H at Webb AFB (Big Spring). FWIW the wash-out rate of 54H at BGS was 47%. Walt BJ But when we add up the wash-out rates from day one physicals and tests then add basic training, CTD, Classification then flying schools, the total has to be well over 95%. Many are called few are chosen. I am inclined to believe that the USAAF of the day, which already was an elite organization due to its unique activities, elected to set the standards for piloting so very high in an effort to assure that it would have on hand sufficient numbers of healthy and bright men to assign, after "washing out" or otherwise not being selected for pilot duties (Needs of the Service) to other flight duties which were also VERY important. (Art Kramer, am I mistaken, or wasn't the "typical" bombardier a well-qualified specimen, from the standpoints of physical readiness and quick wits? And the navigators, as well?) Many were called, indeed. But I have a hunch that quite a large proportion of the men who were not assigned to pilot duties could probably HAVE been so assigned, and maybe would have been, except for the Needs of the Service. And unless competent guys were selected for training in the OTHER important crew duties, the USAAF would hardly have been so successful in the aggregate. It managed to find first-rate men for all crew duties, including especially those of bombardier and navigator. Becoming a competent bombardier was no easy task. ir navigation, especially where Air Navigation weather, winds, undercasts, overcasts, etc were concerned was no walk in the park, either. Am I completely off-base? Request your commentary. No you are not off base. But I never went through pilot training. I was classified as a Bombardier right out of San Antonio since my tests indicated that was what I was best suited for. And I think they were right, I really enjoyed the Norden and navigating and did quite well at it. I graduated second in my class at Big Spring and was assigned to Marauders as were all those guys at the top of the class. This is to dispel any idea that bombardiers and navigators were all washed out pilots, Very few were. The highest math skills were needed by the Navigators. I know many pilots who were totally befuddled by what it took to navigate celestially. Each specialty had its special demands and we were chosen to fill those jobs based on our skills. But I am sure that you are right and many who washed out were moved into jobs where there talents could best be used. Arthur Kramer My pilot training class was 56U. I flew PA-18s and T-6Gs at Hondo AB, TX and B-25s at Goodfellow AFB, TX. The class was a combination of student officers from the ROTC programs and Aviation Cadets. I think the overall washout rate after starting training was slightly less than 40%. I remember at lease one SIE (self initiated elimination). After getting my pilot wings I was sent to AOB (Air Observer Bombardier) training at James Connally AFB because I was going to SAC in RB-47s and Gen. Lemay wanted one of the two pilots to be triple rated. I got navigator wings from that school and was rated as navigator and radar bombardier. We were called "triple headed monsters". As a new co-pilot on an RB-47 I helped the RN with mission planning and celestial precomps. I did all the sextant work from a port at the co-pilot's position. I also plotted all three star fixes on a Vaid computer as a back up to the RN and gave him a range and bearing from the assumed position for a cross check. I never made a radar bomb run in B-47s or B-52s, but I think I had a better understanding of the N and RNs jobs because of my training. Gene Myers Art Kramer's nostalgia- All Aviation Students were classified by the US Army Air Corps, during WW II, at a Classification Center, to determine aptitude to become a Pilot, a Navigator, or a Bombardier. Each Student undergoing Classification received 3 Ratings, the maximum was an 8. Kramer received 3 #'s also, just like everyone else. Those with 8's went to Pilot Training or NavigationTraining, if you washed out of Pilot Training, you were sent to Navigator Training, if you washed out of Navigator Traing you were sent to Bombardier Traing, if you washed out of Bombardier Training you were sent to Gunnery School or the Infantry. Gene Myers Nostalgia If you will check you orders your orders from Mather, you will ind you were Rated a Bombardier, A Radar Observer and from Ellington a Navigator. Therefore you re a 4 Headed Monster, entitled to wear4 sets of Rated Officer Wings! I just don't remember having difficulty where Kramer said his professional Bombardiers did, do you? I.E.:"Becoming a competent bombardier was no easy task. ir navigation, especially where Air Navigation weather, winds, undercasts, overcasts, etc were concerned was no walk in the park, either. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: What it took to get wings in WW II.
From: "Phineas Pinkham" Date: 7/15/03 10:24 AM Pacifi f you will check you orders your orders from Mather, you will ind you were Rated a Bombardier, A Radar Observer and from Ellington a Navigator. Therefore you re a 4 Headed Monster, entitled to wear4 sets of Rated Officer Interesting. I assume you were a pilot... What plane? What theatre? Tell us all. Arthur Kramer Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: What it took to get wings in WW II.
From: vincent p. norris Date: 7/15/03 7:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time Message-id: I think that estimate is much too high. I don't know how many pilots there were in the Air Corps during WW II (are you also including bombardiers and navigators?), but if they were only two or three percent of the number who started, then the starting number would have to have been larger than the entire U.S. male population! Roughly speaking. vince norris How can you know that when you don't know the final number? Arthur Kramer I don't "know" it, Art, which I admitted, and which is why I added "roughly speaking." If you know it, let the rest of us know and we'll do the math, just for curiosity's sake. vince norris I have no idea which is why I don't try to speculate and guesstimate. Roughly speaking that is. Arthur Kramer Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
The highest math skills were needed by the Navigators.
Art, if I may jump in here again, surely you know that's an exaggeration. Celestial navigation requires no math skills beyond the ability to read a table and do simple arithmetic--the arithmetic every kid learns by the time he gets to eighth grade. It requires no knowledge of "higher math." No differential or integral calculus, or simultaneous equations, or for that matter, even how to do square roots. I went through navy flight training from 1949 to 1951. At that time, at least, the navy had no separate training for navigators; all midshipmen and navcads in multi-engine flight training were taught celestial navigation and it was assumed they would serve as navigators until they worked their way up to copilot. I received so many hours of celestial navigation training that when I returned to the University of Illinois to complete my undergrad program, I was awarded 30 semester-hour credits of celestial navigation! That is the equivalent of a full, two semester college program. As a result, I was able to receive my bachelor's degree a full year early. So I can say, agian, that celestial navigation requires no math skills bryond the ability to read a table and do simple arithmetic. All the difficult math was done by those who prepared the tables, so that aboard an aircraft, it took very little time to do the simple math requried between taking the shot and plotting the position. When an aircraft is moving along at a couple hundred knots, that is important. I took a commission in the marine corps, where I had served as an enlisted man before being selected for flight training. So I can also say that in the marines, the aircraft navigators were enlisted men, who needed a GCT only 110 (slightly above average) to attend navigation school. vince norris |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: What it took to get wings in WW II.
From: vincent p. norris Date: 7/15/03 8:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time Message-id: The highest math skills were needed by the Navigators. Art, if I may jump in here again, surely you know that's an exaggeration. Celestial navigation requires no math skills beyond the ability to read a table and do simple arithmetic--the arithmetic every kid learns by the time he gets to eighth grade. It requires no knowledge of "higher math." No differential or integral calculus, or simultaneous equations, or for that matter, even how to do square roots. I went through navy flight training from 1949 to 1951. At that time, at least, the navy had no separate training for navigators; all midshipmen and navcads in multi-engine flight training were taught celestial navigation and it was assumed they would serve as navigators until they worked their way up to copilot. I received so many hours of celestial navigation training that when I returned to the University of Illinois to complete my undergrad program, I was awarded 30 semester-hour credits of celestial navigation! That is the equivalent of a full, two semester college program. As a result, I was able to receive my bachelor's degree a full year early. So I can say, agian, that celestial navigation requires no math skills bryond the ability to read a table and do simple arithmetic. All the difficult math was done by those who prepared the tables, We had to DERIVE the tables just to get through cadet school. Those comfortable with numbers could do it in the time allowed., Those not comfortable with numbers who couldn't make the time requirements washed out. How do you feel about having a navigator on your crew who was not comfortable with numbers? Or how about one who took so damned long to do an HO-216 you weren't there any more?. Arthur Kramer Visit my WW II B-26 website at: http://www.coastcomp.com/artkramer |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
from 1949 to 1951. At that time, at least, the navy had no separate training
for navigators; all midshipmen and navcads in multi-engine flight training were taught celestial navigation My 1953-1954 Pensacola memory exactly. The additional nav (including celestial) and carrier ops probably explain why Navy cadets took 1.5 years to graduate while the AF people did it in one. (Either that or fundamental sloth/stupidity.) Quent Quent |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
"Chris Mark" wrote From: vincent p. norris I don't know how many pilots there were in the Air Corps during WW II I found one stray figure that might be useful: in 1944 the AAFTC trained 80,693 pilots. I believe that was the peak year. As an item of interest, in 1946, it trained 344 pilots. Training figures during the WWII era (1939-1945) for the Air Force: Pilots ------------------------------- 233,198 Primary with 88,279 (~28%) failures* 193,440 Advanced with (~13%) 28,790 (~13%) failures 108,337 Transition with 7,474 (~7%) failures. Assuming everyone went Primary, Advanced, Transition (I'd *guess* that's true but someone who knows is welcome to correct the assumption), that's a total failure rate of about 39%. Bombardiers ---------------------------------- 28,361 total with 3,423 (~11%) failures** Navigation ----------------------------------- 56,119 total with 10,822 (~16%) failures*** Bombardier/Navigation ------------------------------------ 28,480 total with 3,533 (~11%) failures**** Gunners ------------------------------------ 309,236 total with 26,815 (~8%) failures***** *all failures includes training deaths ** includes Precision, Instructor, and Refresher courses *** includes Celestial, Dead Reckoning, Instructor, and Refresher **** includes Bombardier/Navigation, Bombardier DR & D8 Navigation ***** includes enlisted, officers, and instructors |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VP-II wings available in Oregon, USA (Or, "How I was coconuted...") | Roberto Waltman | Home Built | 2 | October 29th 04 04:21 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP | vvcd | Home Built | 0 | September 22nd 04 07:16 PM |
Double covering fabric covered wings | [email protected] | Home Built | 9 | May 9th 04 08:39 PM |
Pitt wings | Al MacDonald | Aerobatics | 2 | November 4th 03 06:40 AM |
Crooked or Wavy Trailing Edges of Wings and Control Surfaces | Larry Smith | Home Built | 3 | October 24th 03 02:31 AM |