Lancasters, pt 6 - Lancaster 35.jpg (1/1)

"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
...

This aircraft and Lancaster 31 appear to have the same coat of arms but
different names underneath. Any ideas which arms and which cities?
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)

"Andrew Chaplin" wrote in message
...
"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
...

This aircraft and Lancaster 31 appear to have the same coat of arms but
different names underneath. Any ideas which arms and which cities?
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)

It's a restored Lancaster, and I'm sure it's the City of Lincoln.

Pat Macguire

"P & H Macguire" wrote in message
...

"Andrew Chaplin" wrote in message
...
"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
...

This aircraft and Lancaster 31 appear to have the same coat of arms but
different names underneath. Any ideas which arms and which cities?


It's a restored Lancaster, and I'm sure it's the City of Lincoln.

Agreed. http://www.ngw.nl/int/gbr/l/lincoln.htm
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)

"Andrew Chaplin" wrote in message
...
"P & H Macguire" wrote in message
...

"Andrew Chaplin" wrote in message
...
"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
...

This aircraft and Lancaster 31 appear to have the same coat of arms but
different names underneath. Any ideas which arms and which cities?


It's a restored Lancaster, and I'm sure it's the City of Lincoln.

Agreed. http://www.ngw.nl/int/gbr/l/lincoln.htm
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)

See http://www.bbmf.co.uk/bomber.html) for a history of this Lancaster,
PA474.

Pictures Lancaster 31, Lancaster 35, z Lancaster 03, and Z Lancaster PMM
show a few of PA474's old colour schemes before her major overhaul and
repaint a year or so ago.

Lancaster 34 might well be PA474 as well - to me, that picture has more of
the look and feel of a modern photograph than an older one.


--
Dave

not-me should be djw401 and there's no need for any wossname