A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » Aviation Images » Aviation Photos
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GAWD!!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old December 19th 06, 10:19 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Papa Fox
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 75
Default GAWD!!

Didn't a DC-10 lose a pylon on TO at O'Hare with loss of a/c and all
on board? P.

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:28:01 +1100, "Conscious Pilate"
wrote:

The Kalitta Air jet took off from O'Hare International Airport in Chicago
late Wednesday. It later reported mechanical problems in one of Its engines,
a Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman in Chicago said.
The Boeing 747 was able to fly, but was diverted as a safety precaution to
Detroit, where it landed without incident, FAA officials said. No one was
injured.
After the landing, airline personnel discovered the engine was completely
gone, FAA officials said.
Michigan authorities searched Thursday for the engine, which may have fallen
into Lake Michigan, the FAA said. The FAA will Investigate the incident, but
the results of an investigation could take weeks.

  #12  
Old December 19th 06, 10:32 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
unstable
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default GAWD!!

"Conscious Pilate" wrote in
:


After the landing, airline personnel discovered the engine was
completely gone, FAA officials said.



and from the damage to the LE it looks like it didn't go quietly.

--Chris
  #13  
Old December 19th 06, 10:32 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
unstable
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default GAWD!!

"Conscious Pilate" wrote in
:


After the landing, airline personnel discovered the engine was
completely gone, FAA officials said.



and from the damage to the LE it looks like it didn't go quietly.

--Chris
  #14  
Old December 19th 06, 10:41 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Ron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 126
Default GAWD!!


"Luke" wrote in message
...


That sure brings back memories...

First thing I thought:
Lucky they did not loose both, like the El-Al 747 did near Amsterdam.

Ron
--
Non urinat in ventum


  #15  
Old December 19th 06, 10:41 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Ron
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 126
Default GAWD!!


"Luke" wrote in message
...


That sure brings back memories...

First thing I thought:
Lucky they did not loose both, like the El-Al 747 did near Amsterdam.

Ron
--
Non urinat in ventum


  #16  
Old December 19th 06, 11:02 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
CD[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default GAWD!!

Sadly your correct. It looks like number one engine did a similar thing too
and flipped back over to top of the wing, damaging the leading edge in the
way back. Fortunately the 747 didn't lose hydraulic power in its port wing
this time.


"Papa Fox" wrote in message
...
Didn't a DC-10 lose a pylon on TO at O'Hare with loss of a/c and all
on board? P.

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:28:01 +1100, "Conscious Pilate"
wrote:

The Kalitta Air jet took off from O'Hare International Airport in Chicago
late Wednesday. It later reported mechanical problems in one of Its
engines,
a Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman in Chicago said.
The Boeing 747 was able to fly, but was diverted as a safety precaution to
Detroit, where it landed without incident, FAA officials said. No one was
injured.
After the landing, airline personnel discovered the engine was completely
gone, FAA officials said.
Michigan authorities searched Thursday for the engine, which may have
fallen
into Lake Michigan, the FAA said. The FAA will Investigate the incident,
but
the results of an investigation could take weeks.



  #17  
Old December 19th 06, 11:02 PM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
CD[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default GAWD!!

Sadly your correct. It looks like number one engine did a similar thing too
and flipped back over to top of the wing, damaging the leading edge in the
way back. Fortunately the 747 didn't lose hydraulic power in its port wing
this time.


"Papa Fox" wrote in message
...
Didn't a DC-10 lose a pylon on TO at O'Hare with loss of a/c and all
on board? P.

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:28:01 +1100, "Conscious Pilate"
wrote:

The Kalitta Air jet took off from O'Hare International Airport in Chicago
late Wednesday. It later reported mechanical problems in one of Its
engines,
a Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman in Chicago said.
The Boeing 747 was able to fly, but was diverted as a safety precaution to
Detroit, where it landed without incident, FAA officials said. No one was
injured.
After the landing, airline personnel discovered the engine was completely
gone, FAA officials said.
Michigan authorities searched Thursday for the engine, which may have
fallen
into Lake Michigan, the FAA said. The FAA will Investigate the incident,
but
the results of an investigation could take weeks.



  #18  
Old December 20th 06, 01:00 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
CD[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default GAWD!!

Great shots and lucky result.

A friend has pointed out to me that this occurred back in October of 2004
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalitta_Air

"Conscious Pilate" wrote in message
...
The Kalitta Air jet took off from O'Hare International Airport in Chicago
late Wednesday. It later reported mechanical problems in one of Its
engines,
a Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman in Chicago said.
The Boeing 747 was able to fly, but was diverted as a safety precaution to
Detroit, where it landed without incident, FAA officials said. No one was
injured.
After the landing, airline personnel discovered the engine was completely
gone, FAA officials said.
Michigan authorities searched Thursday for the engine, which may have
fallen
into Lake Michigan, the FAA said. The FAA will Investigate the incident,
but
the results of an investigation could take weeks.




  #19  
Old December 20th 06, 01:00 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
CD[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21
Default GAWD!!

Great shots and lucky result.

A friend has pointed out to me that this occurred back in October of 2004
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalitta_Air

"Conscious Pilate" wrote in message
...
The Kalitta Air jet took off from O'Hare International Airport in Chicago
late Wednesday. It later reported mechanical problems in one of Its
engines,
a Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman in Chicago said.
The Boeing 747 was able to fly, but was diverted as a safety precaution to
Detroit, where it landed without incident, FAA officials said. No one was
injured.
After the landing, airline personnel discovered the engine was completely
gone, FAA officials said.
Michigan authorities searched Thursday for the engine, which may have
fallen
into Lake Michigan, the FAA said. The FAA will Investigate the incident,
but
the results of an investigation could take weeks.




  #20  
Old December 20th 06, 03:14 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
John[_8_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 35
Default GAWD!!

On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:28:01 +1100, "Conscious Pilate"
wrote:

The Kalitta Air jet took off from O'Hare International Airport in Chicago
late Wednesday. It later reported mechanical problems in one of Its engines,
a Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman in Chicago said.
The Boeing 747 was able to fly, but was diverted as a safety precaution to
Detroit, where it landed without incident, FAA officials said. No one was
injured.
After the landing, airline personnel discovered the engine was completely
gone, FAA officials said.
Michigan authorities searched Thursday for the engine, which may have fallen
into Lake Michigan, the FAA said. The FAA will Investigate the incident, but
the results of an investigation could take weeks.


Looking at picture 20159, you will notice that #2 engine is off it's
axis - pointing inboard. Makes me think this is a possible mid-air as
I cannot conjure a scenario where the outboard (and more aft) engine
could do this. Especially considering that the photo (28297) of #1
pylon indicates an up, outboard and aft rotation of the separated
engine.

J. W. Alger
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oh me gawd! It's really gone over the top! Roger Long Piloting 10 December 31st 03 07:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.