If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
777 again.
Eeyore wrote in
: john bates wrote: "Eeyore" wrote john bates wrote: The fact that some experienced people all mentioned the nose high attitude before a stall (Which was the case due to the very short distance it travelled on the grass) If it had truly STALLED there would have been a far nastier mess. The pilot was just 'stetching' the glide. why did it do this if under perfect control? This to me implies that it was not just the engines. The engines didn't fail. There's clear evidence at least one was turning when it landed. They 'failed' to respond to a call for power. That's where the 'failure' is and it looks likely to be electronic to me (or some bizarre fuel quality related issue). Graham *** All very interesting, Thanks Graham. As a followup I thought of a better explanation perhaps. The engines weren't working because of a failure somewhere else. You'll see the AAIB has been careful (unlike the media) not to say 'the engines failed'. There's a big difference between 'not working' and failed. Wheras you just pul any old thing out of your ass whether you understand it or not. And you don't./ Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|