A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

ILS Rwy 20 at Marion, ILL



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old February 22nd 05, 04:29 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Roy Smith" wrote in message
...

The distance shown on the profile view from the FAF (JONNY) to the MAP
should be changed from 4.9 NM to 4.57 (bottom-right of the plate).
They leave it to you to work out new timings. At 90 kts, it's a
change from 3:16 to 3:03. There's no information as to *WHY* they
moved the MAP, but if you're still using the old timing, you're going
to drive 15 seconds past the MAP before starting your missed.


They moved the MAP because they moved the runway threshold, runway 2/20 has
been lengthened. The plate still shows the length as 6503 feet but AirNav
shows it to be 8012 feet. I have to wonder why that isn't included in the
NOTAM.



These changes are "WIth Effect Until Further Notice.". That's
probably the reason Jepp decided to issue a new chart. My guess is
that the S-ILS minimums will come back some day, perhaps after some
transmitter or antenna is repaired, and/or some flight testing can be
done. But there's no date scheduled.


I'd expect the S-ILS minima will be back after the glideslope is moved a
quarter mile north.


  #12  
Old February 23rd 05, 02:56 PM
gregscheetah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks for everyone's help. Great source of information.

And, Yes, the FSS briefer read the NOTAM about the unlit towers. They
also read a notam about MSA from Pioneer increasing to 3200 for ILS RWY
17. I then specifically asked if the ILS was in service. The answer
was "yes".

Even when I asked center about the GS problem they were not aware of
it.

Since I was snowed / iced in at Wichita for the next day, I went to the
FSS and Tower and asked them what I had done wrong. I wanted to find
out what I should have done in order to not make this mistake again.

I found that there are two references I will forever use: the biweekly
notams booklet and A/FD. If you want this info from the briefer, you
must ask the FSS briefer for the FDC notams and D notams. They may
have to go get the book, and you may have to wait, but that is the only
way to get the info if you don't have the biweekly notam booklet.

There is a good reference on Avweb on this issue: The Notam Mess:
http://www.avweb.com/news/system/183201-1.html

That article mentioned that Jeppesen does a good job of incorporating
the FDC notams into their charts. If anyone has a Jepp chart of PNC, I
would be interested to know if it has the GS OTS note. This would be
one + for using the jepp charts.

Did the briefer specifically say that the ILS was operational, or did
he just fail to mention the GS OTS notam?


  #13  
Old February 23rd 05, 04:14 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"gregscheetah" wrote in message
oups.com...

And, Yes, the FSS briefer read the NOTAM about the unlit towers. They
also read a notam about MSA from Pioneer increasing to 3200 for ILS RWY
17. I then specifically asked if the ILS was in service. The answer
was "yes".


Well, that is a correct answer albeit incomplete.



Since I was snowed / iced in at Wichita for the next day, I went to the
FSS and Tower and asked them what I had done wrong. I wanted to find
out what I should have done in order to not make this mistake again.

I found that there are two references I will forever use: the biweekly
notams booklet and A/FD. If you want this info from the briefer, you
must ask the FSS briefer for the FDC notams and D notams. They may
have to go get the book, and you may have to wait, but that is the only
way to get the info if you don't have the biweekly notam booklet.


Not true, there is an online version of the biweekly notam booklet:

http://www.faa.gov/ntap/


  #14  
Old February 23rd 05, 05:29 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 23 Feb 2005 06:56:49 -0800, "gregscheetah"
wrote:

If you want this info from the briefer, you
must ask the FSS briefer for the FDC notams and D notams. They may
have to go get the book, and you may have to wait, but that is the only
way to get the info if you don't have the biweekly notam bookle



A fact that any decent instructor should have covered with you during
your training.
  #15  
Old February 23rd 05, 07:46 PM
gregscheetah
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Ya,ya,ya,.....

A fact that any decent instructor should have covered with you during
your training.


This really helps the readers. While I'm sure you recall 100% of
everything you have ever heard, I usually require a little repetition
and practice in order to become proficient at anything.
Congratulations, and thanks for the pointer.

I was thinking that maybe there are others like me, who forgot that if
the FSS briefer tells you the ILS is in service, it may not actually be
in service. I thought maybe this thread would contribute to reminding
others that there are three sources of notams and that duats / fss does
not cover them all.

I can't wait to see what will happen when Lockheed takes over control
of the fss's.

  #16  
Old February 23rd 05, 07:51 PM
Doug Carter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

gregscheetah wrote:

DUATS will not provide all the notams.


Seems like it actually does. Perhaps the information was posted after
your flight but the DUATS standard briefing has:

!MWA 12/002 MWA 20 ILS GP OTS

!FDC 5/1241 MWA FI/T WILLIAMSON COUNTY REGIONAL, MARION, IL.
ILS RWY 20, AMDT 11A...
S-ILS MINIMUMS NA.
DISTANCE FAF TO MAP 4.57 NM.
DELETE ALL REFERENCE TO MM.


If anything, DUATS seems to provde too much info and the principal risk
is missing the wheat for the chaff...

I feel much safer with DUATS and the other sources on the Internet than
depending on a carbon based unit reading some of the same info to me
over the phone...
  #17  
Old February 23rd 05, 08:19 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The fact that FDC NOTAMS are not part of a standard briefing, and that
one has to ask a briefer for them, is an extremely important aspect of
instrument flying, and should be hammered into every sudent's head by
his instructor.

I too learned this the hard way, many years ago.. It should not have
been so. It is as basic as minimums on an approach, and very close to
being as important. Arriving at a destination and discovering that an
expected procedure is not authorized is more than inconvenient, it can
be a safety factor.

But instructors get so caught up in stupid stuff like making sure
their students can fly exactly one minute inbound legs in a holding
pattern, they often forget to mention the important things like FDC
notams..




On 23 Feb 2005 11:46:51 -0800, "gregscheetah"
wrote:


Ya,ya,ya,.....

A fact that any decent instructor should have covered with you during
your training.


This really helps the readers. While I'm sure you recall 100% of
everything you have ever heard, I usually require a little repetition
and practice in order to become proficient at anything.
Congratulations, and thanks for the pointer.

I was thinking that maybe there are others like me, who forgot that if
the FSS briefer tells you the ILS is in service, it may not actually be
in service. I thought maybe this thread would contribute to reminding
others that there are three sources of notams and that duats / fss does
not cover them all.

I can't wait to see what will happen when Lockheed takes over control
of the fss's.


  #18  
Old February 23rd 05, 10:14 PM
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
...
The fact that FDC NOTAMS are not part of a standard briefing, and that
one has to ask a briefer for them, is an extremely important aspect of
instrument flying, and should be hammered into every sudent's head by
his instructor.

I too learned this the hard way, many years ago.. It should not have
been so. It is as basic as minimums on an approach, and very close to
being as important. Arriving at a destination and discovering that an
expected procedure is not authorized is more than inconvenient, it can
be a safety factor.

But instructors get so caught up in stupid stuff like making sure
their students can fly exactly one minute inbound legs in a holding
pattern, they often forget to mention the important things like FDC
notams..


and its a pretty important aspect to remember for the checkride too.


  #19  
Old February 24th 05, 12:23 PM
Peter Clark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 23 Feb 2005 06:56:49 -0800, "gregscheetah"
wrote:

That article mentioned that Jeppesen does a good job of incorporating
the FDC notams into their charts. If anyone has a Jepp chart of PNC, I
would be interested to know if it has the GS OTS note. This would be
one + for using the jepp charts.


FWIW, the Jepp package dated 2/16 (the 25 Feb 05 cycle) has a new
sheet for KMWA with the ILS portion shown as NA.
  #20  
Old February 24th 05, 09:36 PM
Stan Gosnell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"gregscheetah" wrote in
oups.com:

That article mentioned that Jeppesen does a good job of incorporating
the FDC notams into their charts. If anyone has a Jepp chart of PNC, I
would be interested to know if it has the GS OTS note. This would be
one + for using the jepp charts.


The Jepp NavData NOTAMS show this:

Marion, ILS Rwy 20, VOR or GPS Rwy 2 and NDB or GPS Rwy 20 procedures
unusable.
ILS Rwy 20 procedure not in database (Rwy2/20 extended - MAP not coincident
with rwy end).

The NavData NOTAMS are issued weekly.

--
Regards,

Stan

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." B. Franklin
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ATTN: Anyone from the Marion Club Slick Soaring 0 November 30th 04 12:21 PM
What Col Killian really said :) Cub Driver Military Aviation 38 September 26th 04 05:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.