If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
The Space Biz (was Buying an incomplete project)
"Marc J. Zeitlin" wrote Not everyone agrees with that perspective (although it's clearly the big moneymaker, at least to start). Personally, I'm on the fence about it. OK, I'm interested. What do you think possible applications would be, besides the obvious tourism aspect? -- Jim in NC |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
The Space Biz
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:28:20 -0800, "Marc J. Zeitlin"
wrote: Morgans wrote: What do you think possible applications would be, besides the obvious tourism aspect? 1) Sub-orbital experimentation. $1.2M/flight (or less), with the ability to carry people, is not substantially different in price from sounding rockets to carry sub-orbital experiments without people. Then again, by NOT carrying an astronaut, the experimenters can carry 200+ more pounds of payload. If I were funding the R&D for a company or university, I would scrutinize very carefully any request for funds that claimed that it would be necessary for the researcher to go into space with the hardware...it's too obviously a junket. And can you imagine lawsuits if a university pays for trip where the researcher gets fried? 2) Orbital astronaut training Just another term for "Space Tourism," I'm afraid, unless NASA or the Russian and Chinese Space Agencies start hiring off the street. Any private company that develops an orbital capability will probably find it more effective to train their people in orbit on their own equipment. Ron Wanttaja |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
The Space Biz
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:23:18 -0800, "Marc J. Zeitlin"
wrote: Just another term for "Space Tourism," I'm afraid, unless NASA or the Russian and Chinese Space Agencies start hiring off the street. Certainly a reasonable viewpoint. Like I said, I'm on the fence about these other uses - some folks think they're viable, some think they're nonsense, and who knows what someone will think up in the future... Remember, no one was ever going to want to go more than 25 mph :-). After all, the hot air balloon has been around over 300 years, and look how far they've advanced.... ahh, well, maybe there's a better example.... The big money, as ever, is in boosting stuff to orbit. Hopefully Rutan will be able to work something out. And you'll be right there to see it, you lucky devil! :-) Ron Wanttaja |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
buying help | John Doe | Owning | 21 | August 17th 05 07:08 PM |
Considering buying a share | Paul Tomblin | Owning | 15 | February 3rd 05 05:24 PM |
Buying an L-2 | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 13 | May 25th 04 04:03 AM |
BUYING Cap 10b(c) | os_pivo | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 13th 03 07:15 PM |
FS:CoF and why I won't be buying it | Steve House | Simulators | 4 | August 16th 03 02:24 AM |