A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Electric windshield defroster



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 2nd 04, 05:34 AM
Paul Lee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Electric windshield defroster

Anybody try one of those automotive rear window electric grid element defroster
kits for defrosting a portion of aircraft winshield?
  #3  
Old September 2nd 04, 06:53 PM
Dick Kurtz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

After molding my own windsheilds recently, I can't think that these
would be a good idea. Acrylic softens at below 300 degrees F and I
think those elements get pretty close to this (locally) I imagine it
could potentially cause localized areas of melt/stress. Of course the
best information would come from buying one and testing it out on some
acrylic to see if it affects it in an undesirable manner.....



(Paul Lee) wrote in message . com...
Anybody try one of those automotive rear window electric grid element defroster
kits for defrosting a portion of aircraft winshield?

  #4  
Old September 3rd 04, 02:02 AM
Robert Bonomi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Dick Kurtz wrote:

(Paul Lee) wrote in message
.com...
Anybody try one of those automotive rear window electric grid element

defroster
kits for defrosting a portion of aircraft winshield?


After molding my own windsheilds recently, I can't think that these
would be a good idea. Acrylic softens at below 300 degrees F and I
think those elements get pretty close to this (locally) I imagine it
could potentially cause localized areas of melt/stress.

[[.. munch ..]]

Obviously the temperature rise depends on how much current you let flow
through the element, _and_ how fast the heat is dissipated. grin

The initial temperature also affects things.

_Without_ running any actual numbers, I suspect that the thermal resistance
of the acrylic is such that, to get enough heat over the area between
strands of the element, and considering the potential cooling effects from
the airstream, that the element temperature _would_ have to rise to the
point of adversely affecting the local strength of the acrylic.

If you're talking about using it strictly on the ground, _pre_-flight,
then it is mostly a question of 'how long are you willing to wait' for
it to have the desired effect. For some reason, if it takes 3 hours to
clear the windshield (arbitrarily pulling a number out of thin air), I
don't think it would be regarded as at all "useful", even if, technically,
it did work.

Trade-off between how hot you let the element, and thus the immediate
surrounding material, get, vs. how long it takes to clear the windshield.


  #5  
Old September 3rd 04, 04:35 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 03 Sep 2004 01:02:47 +0000,
(Robert Bonomi) wrote:

In article ,
Dick Kurtz wrote:

(Paul Lee) wrote in message
e.com...
Anybody try one of those automotive rear window electric grid element

defroster
kits for defrosting a portion of aircraft winshield?


You could always use the electric defroster units that used to be
available back in the days of the Model "A" Ford.
They mounted to the windscreen with suction cups, about half an inch
from the glass, and warmed the glass radiantly. You would still need
to make sure the Acrylic did not get too warm.

After molding my own windsheilds recently, I can't think that these
would be a good idea. Acrylic softens at below 300 degrees F and I
think those elements get pretty close to this (locally) I imagine it
could potentially cause localized areas of melt/stress.

[[.. munch ..]]

Obviously the temperature rise depends on how much current you let flow
through the element, _and_ how fast the heat is dissipated. grin

The initial temperature also affects things.

_Without_ running any actual numbers, I suspect that the thermal resistance
of the acrylic is such that, to get enough heat over the area between
strands of the element, and considering the potential cooling effects from
the airstream, that the element temperature _would_ have to rise to the
point of adversely affecting the local strength of the acrylic.

If you're talking about using it strictly on the ground, _pre_-flight,
then it is mostly a question of 'how long are you willing to wait' for
it to have the desired effect. For some reason, if it takes 3 hours to
clear the windshield (arbitrarily pulling a number out of thin air), I
don't think it would be regarded as at all "useful", even if, technically,
it did work.

Trade-off between how hot you let the element, and thus the immediate
surrounding material, get, vs. how long it takes to clear the windshield.


  #6  
Old September 3rd 04, 05:33 AM
Capt.Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Paul Lee" wrote in message Anybody try one of those automotive rear
window electric grid element defroster
kits for defrosting a portion of aircraft winshield?


Production heated windshields in aircraft have thermistors to prevent
overheating, acrylic or glass. Your idea is valid if you can control the
temperature.

D.


  #7  
Old September 3rd 04, 11:19 AM
Barnyard BOb -
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default




Production heated windshields in aircraft have thermistors to prevent
overheating, acrylic or glass. Your idea is valid if you can control the
temperature.

D.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I suspect the heat is controlled to a safe level
by the resistance of the heating element itself.

This type of system won't meet the needs of an icing
Lear Jet at 50,000 feet, but it is sufficient for cars...
or aircraft that have no need of high wattage termistor
designs operating @ - 40 degrees F and .8 mach.

Barnyard BOb - K.I.S.S.
  #8  
Old September 4th 04, 03:37 AM
Capt.Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Barnyard BOb -" wrote in message This type of system won't meet the
needs of an icing Lear Jet at 50,000 feet,


Lear's system doesn't meet the needs of a Lear, hence the bath towel in
every -20 and -30 series cockpit.

or aircraft that have no need of high wattage termistor
designs operating @ - 40 degrees F and .8 mach.


I seem to recall some sort of temperature control on the acrylic windshield
of the Cessna 414. I can't confirm it right now because my reference
material is stored in a mandatory curfew area.

D. (still better than shoveling snow)


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How long an Electric Horizon GYRO was used? Luo Zheng Home Built 0 June 26th 04 02:55 AM
Electric Vehicle sanman Home Built 3 May 24th 04 07:08 PM
Newbie Question - Vacuum vs Electric Bill Denton Aerobatics 1 April 15th 04 11:30 PM
the Jumping Jack - Electric ARF Pattern Plane FlitonUSA Aerobatics 0 January 15th 04 07:39 AM
Pumping fuel backwards through an electric fuel pump Greg Reid Home Built 15 October 7th 03 07:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.