|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
January 6th 07, 01:35 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
UFO's, concluded - ufo 23.jpg (1/1)
|
|
#2
January 6th 07, 02:26 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
UFO's, concluded - ufo 23.jpg (1/1)
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:35:41 -0600, Mitchell Holman wrote:
ufo 23.jpg Genuine unknown. Trindade Island off the Brazilian coast, witnessed by crew of IGY ship, 1957. One of the 2 most solid photographic cases on record.
|
|
#3
January 6th 07, 02:26 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
UFO's, concluded - ufo 23.jpg (1/1)
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:35:41 -0600, Mitchell Holman wrote:
ufo 23.jpg Genuine unknown. Trindade Island off the Brazilian coast, witnessed by crew of IGY ship, 1957. One of the 2 most solid photographic cases on record.
|
|
#4
January 6th 07, 03:18 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
UFO's, concluded - ufo 23.jpg (1/1)
Al Grey wrote in news:1NDnh.562881
$R63.52451@pd7urf1no: On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:35:41 -0600, Mitchell Holman wrote: ufo 23.jpg Genuine unknown. Trindade Island off the Brazilian coast, witnessed by crew of IGY ship, 1957. One of the 2 most solid photographic cases on record. This is the one the debunkers have the most trouble with, true enough. Many witnesses, all credible, no camera glitches, sufficient detail. The Mexico City one (ufo 18) is also has has good credibility. http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case864.htm
|
|
#5
January 6th 07, 03:18 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
UFO's, concluded - ufo 23.jpg (1/1)
Al Grey wrote in news:1NDnh.562881
$R63.52451@pd7urf1no: On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:35:41 -0600, Mitchell Holman wrote: ufo 23.jpg Genuine unknown. Trindade Island off the Brazilian coast, witnessed by crew of IGY ship, 1957. One of the 2 most solid photographic cases on record. This is the one the debunkers have the most trouble with, true enough. Many witnesses, all credible, no camera glitches, sufficient detail. The Mexico City one (ufo 18) is also has has good credibility. http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case864.htm
|
|
#6
January 6th 07, 03:39 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
UFO's, concluded - ufo 23.jpg (1/1)
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:18:04 -0600, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Al Grey wrote in news:1NDnh.562881 $R63.52451@pd7urf1no: On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:35:41 -0600, Mitchell Holman wrote: ufo 23.jpg Genuine unknown. Trindade Island off the Brazilian coast, witnessed by crew of IGY ship, 1957. One of the 2 most solid photographic cases on record. This is the one the debunkers have the most trouble with, true enough. Many witnesses, all credible, no camera glitches, sufficient detail. And all verified by the Brazilian military and government. The Mexico City one (ufo 18) is also has has good credibility. http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case864.htm Well .... not really. That is a notorious rip-off site, and not very credible overall. The video, after extensive analysis, was proven to be digitally fabricated, using sophisticated video-game techniques and algorithms. In fact, it was ufologist video-game aficionados who first suggested that as the solution. Well, as is said, "It only takes /one/!" Al Grey
|
|
#7
January 6th 07, 03:39 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
UFO's, concluded - ufo 23.jpg (1/1)
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:18:04 -0600, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Al Grey wrote in news:1NDnh.562881 $R63.52451@pd7urf1no: On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:35:41 -0600, Mitchell Holman wrote: ufo 23.jpg Genuine unknown. Trindade Island off the Brazilian coast, witnessed by crew of IGY ship, 1957. One of the 2 most solid photographic cases on record. This is the one the debunkers have the most trouble with, true enough. Many witnesses, all credible, no camera glitches, sufficient detail. And all verified by the Brazilian military and government. The Mexico City one (ufo 18) is also has has good credibility. http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case864.htm Well .... not really. That is a notorious rip-off site, and not very credible overall. The video, after extensive analysis, was proven to be digitally fabricated, using sophisticated video-game techniques and algorithms. In fact, it was ufologist video-game aficionados who first suggested that as the solution. Well, as is said, "It only takes /one/!" Al Grey
|
|
#8
January 6th 07, 03:58 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
UFO's, concluded - ufo 23.jpg (1/1)
Al Grey wrote in news
 REnh.557578$5R2.161879@pd7urf3no: On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:18:04 -0600, Mitchell Holman wrote: Al Grey wrote in news:1NDnh.562881 $R63.52451@pd7urf1no: On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:35:41 -0600, Mitchell Holman wrote: ufo 23.jpg Genuine unknown. Trindade Island off the Brazilian coast, witnessed by crew of IGY ship, 1957. One of the 2 most solid photographic cases on record. This is the one the debunkers have the most trouble with, true enough. Many witnesses, all credible, no camera glitches, sufficient detail. And all verified by the Brazilian military and government. I remember reading about nearly identical UFO sightings by Himilayans and Andean villagers, describing the same craft at the same time that also defied explanation back in the early 1970's, IIRC. The Mexico City one (ufo 18) is also has has good credibility. http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case864.htm Well .... not really. That is a notorious rip-off site, and not very credible overall. The video, after extensive analysis, was proven to be digitally fabricated, using sophisticated video-game techniques and algorithms. In fact, it was ufologist video-game aficionados who first suggested that as the solution. I hadn't heard that. Makes you wonder about the motives of such laborious fabricators. Throwing a hubcap in the air and taking a picture is one thing, but.........
|
|
#9
January 6th 07, 03:58 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
UFO's, concluded - ufo 23.jpg (1/1)
Al Grey wrote in news
REnh.557578$5R2.161879@pd7urf3no: On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:18:04 -0600, Mitchell Holman wrote: Al Grey wrote in news:1NDnh.562881 $R63.52451@pd7urf1no: On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:35:41 -0600, Mitchell Holman wrote: ufo 23.jpg Genuine unknown. Trindade Island off the Brazilian coast, witnessed by crew of IGY ship, 1957. One of the 2 most solid photographic cases on record. This is the one the debunkers have the most trouble with, true enough. Many witnesses, all credible, no camera glitches, sufficient detail. And all verified by the Brazilian military and government. I remember reading about nearly identical UFO sightings by Himilayans and Andean villagers, describing the same craft at the same time that also defied explanation back in the early 1970's, IIRC. The Mexico City one (ufo 18) is also has has good credibility. http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case864.htm Well .... not really. That is a notorious rip-off site, and not very credible overall. The video, after extensive analysis, was proven to be digitally fabricated, using sophisticated video-game techniques and algorithms. In fact, it was ufologist video-game aficionados who first suggested that as the solution. I hadn't heard that. Makes you wonder about the motives of such laborious fabricators. Throwing a hubcap in the air and taking a picture is one thing, but.........
|
|
#10
January 6th 07, 04:22 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
|
|||
|
|||
|
UFO's, concluded - ufo 23.jpg (1/1)
On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:58:55 -0600, Mitchell Holman wrote:
Al Grey wrote in news REnh.557578$5R2.161879@pd7urf3no: On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:18:04 -0600, Mitchell Holman wrote: Al Grey wrote in news:1NDnh.562881 $R63.52451@pd7urf1no: On Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:35:41 -0600, Mitchell Holman wrote: ufo 23.jpg Genuine unknown. Trindade Island off the Brazilian coast, witnessed by crew of IGY ship, 1957. One of the 2 most solid photographic cases on record. This is the one the debunkers have the most trouble with, true enough. Many witnesses, all credible, no camera glitches, sufficient detail. And all verified by the Brazilian military and government. I remember reading about nearly identical UFO sightings by Himilayans and Andean villagers, describing the same craft at the same time that also defied explanation back in the early 1970's, IIRC. The Himalayan sounds familiar, but the Andean one was good, photos of multiple objects with excellent clarity. And then the entire valley and all the witnesses perished in a large earthquake. The Mexico City one (ufo 18) is also has has good credibility. http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case864.htm Well .... not really. That is a notorious rip-off site, and not very credible overall. The video, after extensive analysis, was proven to be digitally fabricated, using sophisticated video-game techniques and algorithms. In fact, it was ufologist video-game aficionados who first suggested that as the solution. I hadn't heard that. Makes you wonder about the motives of such laborious fabricators. Throwing a hubcap in the air and taking a picture is one thing, but......... Yeah, rather annoying, especially the wasted time trying to prove the fakery. Here's an /excellent/ historical site that seems to cover everything. If it's there, it's well-researched and very credible stuff: http://www.nicap.org/
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| UFO's, concluded - ufo 21.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 6th 07 01:35 AM |
| UFO's, concluded - ufo 18.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 6th 07 01:35 AM |
| UFO's, concluded - ufo 17.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 6th 07 01:35 AM |
Linear Mode
