A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Letter to the FAA



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 25th 17, 04:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Dan Marotta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,601
Default Letter to the FAA

If it was really 50-50 nobody would be flying. Did that statistic come
from MSNBC or Johnny Depp?

On 6/24/2017 9:44 PM, wrote:
The death toll doesn't match your hyperbole

In your article on "Launch Emergencies" you state that the odds are
50/50 of something going bad on each launch. Either it will or it
wont. Experiencing something go bad on a launch such as what happened to
me will convince any tow pilot of the imperative need to have a positive
and unfettered chance to release the glider. As you said, the Tost
release mechanism is not affected by vertical or horizontal loads
imposed by a glider flying in an out of bounds towing position. Clearly
the Scnweizer hook is affected by such conditions rendering it useless.


In a low, severe kiting incident such as mine the tow pilot must
react in an instant. Anything that delays that reaction can result in a
catastrophy. Relying on the rope to break under such circumstances is
not a good alternative to a positive release mechanism. Any commercial
operator or club still operating with a Schweizer hook and/or a release
handle not conveniently available to the pilot is playing Russian
roulette with the life of their tow pilot.


Walt




--
Walt Connelly


--
Dan, 5J
  #2  
Old June 25th 17, 09:09 PM
Walt Connelly Walt Connelly is offline
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by AviationBanter: Aug 2010
Posts: 365
Default

[quote=Dan Marotta;949727]If it was really 50-50 nobody would be flying. Did that statistic come
from MSNBC or Johnny Depp?

Actually it was in an article from Tom Knauff called "Launching Emergencies." I read everything I can find on the subject. I saw the humor, the tongue in cheek of what he said, did you not?

http://www.eglider.org/NewsArticles/...mergencies.htm

Walt
  #3  
Old June 25th 17, 07:29 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Don Johnstone[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 398
Default Letter to the FAA

At 03:44 25 June 2017, wrote:
The death toll doesn't match your hyperbole

How many pilots have to die before you act, give me a number.

  #5  
Old June 23rd 17, 11:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 94
Default Letter to the FAA

On Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 8:43:10 PM UTC-4, Walt Connelly wrote:
Before I send my letter to the FAA I'd like to ask if anyone has ever
attempted to get them to see the light and end the use of Schweizer
hooks on tow planes here in the land of the free and the home of the
brave. It is a well known fact and clearly stated in the SSA/SSF and
FAA circulars and literature that under certain conditions (the exact
condition that the tow pilot will need to release) that it can be near
impossible to release the glider. Tow planes have crashed, lives have
been lost and at the same time everyone knows that this is a dangerous
situation.

Along with the conversion to Tost hooks I'd like to see it made
mandatory that the release handles be up high, near the throttle and
quickly available to the tow pilot with adequate mechanical advantage. I
can assure you that one does not have the time to go ducking and
reaching and feeling for a handle down on the floor of a Pawnee while
the glider kites in back of you.

The idea of requiring nose hooks on all gliders does not seem to be
feasible although it has been brought up to me as something that needs
to be addressed. My understanding is that the CG hook is meant for
ground/winch launch operations, however I have probably done thousands
of CG hook aero tows with no problem. For the most part these are ships
being flown by the best and most aware pilots. I'd like more input from
experience pilots on this point.

I currently have a number of highly experienced pilots from all levels
of aviation in agreement with me and willing to help me in this cause.


If one life is saved as a result of this endeavor then it will be well
worth it.

Walt Connelly




--
Walt Connelly


Back in the late 70's I witnessed an incident that almost became tragic for both the tow pilot and the glider pilot. Location was at the old Kendall Gliderport SW of Miami, and was owned by Mary GAffney.
Rudy was the owner of the operation and was towing a 233 on a pattern tow when the glider pilot kited after the glider pilot had not actually pulled the release, but turned in an upward angle. Suddenly the tow plane was in a spin, with the glider attached and they were both hurling toward the ground.. Somehow the glider released and Rudy was able to recover before slamming into the ground. I remember Rudy saying that he could not get the release to function because of the heavy load placed upon the assembly. Bob Youngblood
  #6  
Old July 3rd 17, 02:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
John Wells
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12
Default Letter to the FAA

Any reason why rope-cutting guillotines (like we have in winches) aren't installed in tow planes? Regardless of the design of the hook, surely redundancy (as long as it doesn't increase the risk of an unintended release, which would potentially be more problematic on tow than on the winch).
  #7  
Old July 3rd 17, 06:32 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bruce Hoult
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 961
Default Letter to the FAA

On Monday, July 3, 2017 at 4:22:54 PM UTC+3, John Wells wrote:
Any reason why rope-cutting guillotines (like we have in winches) aren't installed in tow planes? Regardless of the design of the hook, surely redundancy (as long as it doesn't increase the risk of an unintended release, which would potentially be more problematic on tow than on the winch).


I believe the installations with a winch to retract the tow rope after glider release also have a guillotine in lieu of a release on the tow plane end..

It might be pretty tricky to design an installation with both a release and a guillotine on the tow plane end without:

1) having the guillotine hanging way off the back of the tow plane, and mounted to what?

2) having the tow rope attachment/pull point much further forward than usual, and potentially difficult to hook up/unhook

3) being able to release the rope in flight (or while taxiing) without cutting the rope and without risk of the rings (or whatever) fouling on the guillotine.


I'm not sure why a guillotine would add any more risk. There are already plenty of ways for PTT to happen, and glider towing should always be performed in a way that makes PTT safe at any point during the takeoff.
  #8  
Old July 4th 17, 12:30 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Chris Rowland[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 45
Default Letter to the FAA

At 13:22 03 July 2017, John Wells wrote:
Any reason why rope-cutting guillotines (like we have in winches) aren't
in=
stalled in tow planes? Regardless of the design of the hook, surely
redund=
ancy (as long as it doesn't increase the risk of an unintended release,
whi=
ch would potentially be more problematic on tow than on the winch).

Our aerotow ropes have weak links at both ends, a weak one at the glider
end and a stronger one at the tug end. Normally the glider weak
link goes but if the tug takes the rope through the hedge the the tug end
goes and no harm - except to the tug pilot's reputation.

Chris

  #9  
Old August 30th 17, 02:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Letter to the FAA

Walt,

Can you give an update on your letter to the FAA regarding this incident?

Regards,
Gerald
  #10  
Old August 30th 17, 04:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 133
Default Letter to the FAA


Gosh, this has been a concern for many years.

At least one way to look at this is to consider is it a problem?

There are recorded instances of glider pilots becoming too high on the tow plane early on tow resulting in lifting the tail of the towplane driving it into the ground. Killing the tow pilot.

It is well known if you lift on the tail-installed tow release with enough force, the Schweizer tow release may not function.

The soaring community can not ignore the problem.

I remember when we installed the Tost tow release on our tow planes many years ago. We felt it best to have our installation (easy) approved by an FAA inspector. He took a simple look at the installation and approved it on the spot.

The Tost tow release is a low cost item and easy to install.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
from latest news letter on vulcan, hope it is of intrest to some of you if you dont get the news letter PAUL H Aviation Photos 0 January 27th 13 11:21 AM
A LETTER OF THANKS minimoa Soaring 0 September 14th 10 12:06 AM
Letter from TSA? Emily Piloting 14 August 14th 06 11:33 PM
A letter to a friend... Greasy Rider© @ invalid.com Naval Aviation 3 August 23rd 05 12:23 AM
Letter from TSA Rosspilot Piloting 2 November 20th 03 01:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.