A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Need Micro Balancer



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old August 17th 03, 02:29 AM
Richard Isakson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Barnyard BOb --" wrote ...

Next time, engage your brain before putting mouth into gear.
Or, just quit smearing the folks that are your bettors.


Bettor - n. One who bets.

So, are you betting for or against Juan?

Rich


  #42  
Old August 17th 03, 02:56 AM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

BOb

It's not 'jock strap'. PC is "athletic supporter'.

Big John


On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 18:04:50 -0500, Barnyard BOb --
wrote:


(Snowbird) wrote:

.... Bob isn't in the ranks of the "severely Bikini Challenged"


Well, that's a mental image I could have done without.... :-)

Ron "Nog!" Wanttaja

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Check out my THONG, if you don't care for a bikini @.....
http://www.1designer-underwear.com/g...guys-thong.htm


Barnyard BOb - Jock Straps R Us


  #43  
Old August 17th 03, 06:28 AM
Snowbird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Big John wrote in message . ..
BOb

It's not 'jock strap'. PC is "athletic supporter'.


Dear John,

You must update your vocabulary. Au currant the
thong is referred to as "butt floss" (on man or woman).

Sydney (this thread is a falling standards zone)
  #44  
Old August 17th 03, 06:30 AM
Snowbird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Rich Ahrens wrote in message si.com...
Snowbird wrote:
Don't under-rate yourself Juan. You manage both, quite nicely.


My goodness, Sydney. You just echoed Ralphie! What's the world coming to?


My goodness Rich! I'm seeing your post in Google! What's the world
coming to?

I didn't see Ralphie -- can you echo something you didn't hear?

Be that as it may -- even a broken clock is right twice a day.

Cheers,
Sydney
  #45  
Old August 17th 03, 07:12 AM
Barnyard BOb --
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Barnyard BOb --" wrote ...

Next time, engage your brain before putting mouth into gear.
Or, just quit smearing the folks that are your bettors.


Bettor - n. One who bets.

So, are you betting for or against Juan?

Rich

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

What kind of odds can be had?


Barnyard BOb --

  #46  
Old August 17th 03, 01:46 PM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Snowbird

Thanks Sydney. One is never too old to learn new thongs (there goes
that darn spell checker again). I meant to say 'things'.

Big John

On 16 Aug 2003 22:28:21 -0700, (Snowbird)
wrote:

Big John wrote in message . ..
BOb

It's not 'jock strap'. PC is "athletic supporter'.


Dear John,

You must update your vocabulary. Au currant the
thong is referred to as "butt floss" (on man or woman).

Sydney (this thread is a falling standards zone)


  #47  
Old August 18th 03, 04:17 PM
Russell Kent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Barnyard BOb -- wrote:

"Barnyard BOb --" wrote ...

Next time, engage your brain before putting mouth into gear.
Or, just quit smearing the folks that are your bettors.


Bettor - n. One who bets.

So, are you betting for or against Juan?

Rich

+++++++++++++++++++++++++

What kind of odds can be had?

Barnyard BOb --


Around here, just about as odd as it can get. :-)

Russell Kent

  #48  
Old August 18th 03, 06:40 PM
Snowbird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Big John wrote in message . ..

Thanks Sydney. One is never too old to learn new thongs (there goes
that darn spell checker again). I meant to say 'things'.


Oh, pleased to oblige . But I can see why some folks would
think it's a bit "cheeky". (sorry about that).

BTW did you get my email our plane's paint scheme? If
the above is a "convenience" address you don't read, please
drop a note to hoeltzli at swbell dot net if you think
you might be able to help us. We were told it's Korean-war
era fighter markings (painted 4 owners ago, owner deceased
I am told) but no one seems able to help us ID them.

Thanks!
Sydney
  #49  
Old August 19th 03, 02:35 AM
Juan E Jimenez
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nope, not kidding at all. This was in fact determined years ago when the
aircraft was put on a pedestal in a large chamber where the govt measures
radar returns. I have no clue how the measurements are made, but that's the
reason the -5J has been designated as a certified cruise missile surrogate.

"C.D. Damron" wrote in message
. net...

"Juan E Jimenez" wrote in message
news:Cje%a.152932$uu5.23026@sccrnsc04...
At 50 ft off the ground and 250 knots, the BD-5J is so invisible to

radar
that a tracking transmitter must be installed so the mission controllers

can
see it.


You have to be kidding.




  #50  
Old August 19th 03, 02:37 AM
Juan E Jimenez
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Snowbird" wrote in message
om...

Seriously, I dunno what pictures you've seen but you must have
him mixed up w/ someone else, Bob isn't in the ranks of the "severely
Bikini Challenged"


What did he do, get a liposuction in the Dominican Republic? :P

Don't under-rate yourself Juan. You manage both, quite nicely.


If that's what you believe is worthwhile, knock yourself out.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.