A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The US war with Iran has already begun (for Israel)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 20th 05, 05:12 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The US war with Iran has already begun (for Israel)

Subject: As he forwarned in February 2005... US war w/IRAN has begun
.....(Scott Ritter):


Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:44:38 -0600

The US war with Iran has already begun
by Scott Ritter
Sunday 19 June 2005 12:06 PM GMT

http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exer...96A02F864D.htm


Americans, along with the rest of the world, are starting to wake up to
the uncomfortable fact that President George Bush not only lied to them
about the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq (the ostensible excuse
for the March 2003 invasion and occupation of that country by US
forces), but also about the very process that led to war.


On 16 October 2002, President Bush told the American people that "I
have not ordered the use of force. I hope that the use of force will
not become necessary."

We know now that this statement was itself a lie, that the president,
by late August 2002, had, in fact, signed off on the 'execute' orders
authorising the US military to begin active military operations inside
Iraq, and that these orders were being implemented as early as
September 2002, when the US Air Force, assisted by the British Royal
Air Force, began expanding its bombardment of targets inside and
outside the so-called no-fly zone in Iraq.

These operations were designed to degrade Iraqi air defence and command
and control capabilities. They also paved the way for the insertion of
US Special Operations units, who were conducting strategic
reconnaissance, and later direct action, operations against specific
targets inside Iraq, prior to the 19 March 2003 commencement of
hostilities.

President Bush had signed a covert finding in late spring 2002, which
authorised the CIA and US Special Operations forces to dispatch
clandestine units into Iraq for the purpose of removing Saddam Hussein
from power.

The fact is that the Iraq war had begun by the beginning of summer
2002, if not earlier.

The violation of a sovereign nation's airspace is an act of war in and
of itself. But the war with Iran has gone far beyond the intelligence
gathering phase.

This timeline of events has ramifications that go beyond historical
trivia or political investigation into the events of the past.

It represents a record of precedent on the part of the Bush
administration which must be acknowledged when considering the ongoing
events regarding US-Iran relations. As was the case with Iraq pre-March
2003, the Bush administration today speaks of "diplomacy" and a desire
for a "peaceful" resolution to the Iranian question.

But the facts speak of another agenda, that of war and the forceful
removal of the theocratic regime, currently wielding the reigns of
power in Tehran.

As with Iraq, the president has paved the way for the conditioning of
the American public and an all-too-compliant media to accept at face
value the merits of a regime change policy regarding Iran, linking the
regime of the Mullah's to an "axis of evil" (together with the newly
"liberated" Iraq and North Korea), and speaking of the absolute
requirement for the spread of "democracy" to the Iranian people.

"Liberation" and the spread of "democracy" have become none-too-subtle
code words within the neo-conservative cabal that formulates and
executes American foreign policy today for militarism and war.

By the intensity of the "liberation/democracy" rhetoric alone,
Americans should be put on notice that Iran is well-fixed in the
cross-hairs as the next target for the illegal policy of regime change
being implemented by the Bush administration.

But Americans, and indeed much of the rest of the world, continue to be
lulled into a false sense of complacency by the fact that overt
conventional military operations have not yet commenced between the
United States and Iran.

As such, many hold out the false hope that an extension of the current
insanity in Iraq can be postponed or prevented in the case of Iran. But
this is a fool's dream.

The reality is that the US war with Iran has already begun. As we
speak, American over flights of Iranian soil are taking place, using
pilotless drones and other, more sophisticated, capabilities.

The violation of a sovereign nation's airspace is an act of war in and
of itself. But the war with Iran has gone far beyond the
intelligence-gathering phase.

President Bush has taken advantage of the sweeping powers granted to
him in the aftermath of 11 September 2001, to wage a global war against
terror and to initiate several covert offensive operations inside Iran.

The most visible of these is the CIA-backed actions recently undertaken
by the Mujahadeen el-Khalq, or MEK, an Iranian opposition group, once
run by Saddam Hussein's dreaded intelligence services, but now working
exclusively for the CIA's Directorate of Operations.

It is bitter irony that the CIA is using a group still labelled as a
terrorist organisation, a group trained in the art of explosive
assassination by the same intelligence units of the former regime of
Saddam Hussein, who are slaughtering American soldiers in Iraq today,
to carry out remote bombings in Iran of the sort that the Bush
administration condemns on a daily basis inside Iraq.

Perhaps the adage of "one man's freedom fighter is another man's
terrorist" has finally been embraced by the White House, exposing as
utter hypocrisy the entire underlying notions governing the ongoing
global war on terror.

But the CIA-backed campaign of MEK terror bombings in Iran are not the
only action ongoing against Iran.

To the north, in neighbouring Azerbaijan, the US military is preparing
a base of operations for a massive military presence that will foretell
a major land-based campaign designed to capture Tehran.

Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld's interest in Azerbaijan may have
escaped the blinkered Western media, but Russia and the Caucasus
nations understand only too well that the die has been cast regarding
Azerbaijan's role in the upcoming war with Iran.

The ethnic links between the Azeri of northern Iran and Azerbaijan were
long exploited by the Soviet Union during the Cold War, and this
vehicle for internal manipulation has been seized upon by CIA
paramilitary operatives and US Special Operations units who are
training with Azerbaijan forces to form special units capable of
operating inside Iran for the purpose of intelligence gathering, direct
action, and mobilising indigenous opposition to the Mullahs in Tehran.

But this is only one use the US has planned for Azerbaijan. American
military aircraft, operating from forward bases in Azerbaijan, will
have a much shorter distance to fly when striking targets in and around
Tehran.

In fact, US air power should be able to maintain a nearly 24-hour a day
presence over Tehran airspace once military hostilities commence.

No longer will the United States need to consider employment of Cold
War-dated plans which called for moving on Tehran from the Arab Gulf
cities of Chah Bahar and Bandar Abbas. US Marine Corps units will be
able to secure these towns in order to protect the vital Straits of
Hormuz, but the need to advance inland has been eliminated.

A much shorter route to Tehran now exists - the coastal highway running
along the Caspian Sea from Azerbaijan to Tehran.

US military planners have already begun war games calling for the
deployment of multi-divisional forces into Azerbaijan.

Logistical planning is well advanced concerning the basing of US air
and ground power in Azerbaijan.

Given the fact that the bulk of the logistical support and command and
control capability required to wage a war with Iran is already forward
deployed in the region thanks to the massive US presence in Iraq, the
build-up time for a war with Iran will be significantly reduced
compared to even the accelerated time tables witnessed with Iraq in
2002-2003.

America and the Western nations continue to be fixated on the ongoing
tragedy and debacle that is Iraq. Much needed debate on the reasoning
behind the war with Iraq and the failed post-war occupation of Iraq is
finally starting to spring up in the United States and elsewhere.

Normally, this would represent a good turn of events. But with
everyone's heads rooted in the events of the past, many are missing out
on the crime that is about to be repeated by the Bush administration in
Iran - an illegal war of aggression, based on false premise, carried
out with little regard to either the people of Iran or the United
States.

Most Americans, together with the mainstream American media, are blind
to the tell-tale signs of war, waiting, instead, for some formal
declaration of hostility, a made-for-TV moment such as was witnessed on
19 March 2003.

We now know that the war had started much earlier. Likewise, history
will show that the US-led war with Iran will not have begun once a
similar formal statement is offered by the Bush administration, but,
rather, had already been under way since June 2005, when the CIA began
its programme of MEK-executed terror bombings in Iran.

Scott Ritter is a former UN weapons inspector in Iraq, 1991-1998, and
author of Iraq Confidential: The Untold Story of America's Intelligence
Conspiracy, to be published by I B Tauris in October 2005.

The opinions expressed here are the author's and do not necessarily
reflect the editorial position or have the endorsement of Aljazeera.


Aljazeera
By Scott Ritter

Bush-Bolton plan to bomb Iran for Israel:

http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=34657

http://nomorewarforisrael.blogspot.com

DOWNING STREET MEMO HEARING: US WENT TO WAR FOR ISRAEL:

http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=36447

  #3  
Old June 20th 05, 11:31 PM
miket6065
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

by Scott Ritter.......for Al Jazeera....nuff said


  #4  
Old June 21st 05, 05:37 AM
Matt Wiser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:

Scott Ritter for Al-Jazerra; you mean "Jihad TV", don't you? Once bought, he stays bought,
unfortunately. Sad to see a ex-Marine now cheerleading for the enemy....

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #5  
Old June 21st 05, 11:16 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Scott Ritter again?

Whatever!


-- all the best, Dan Ford

email (put Cubdriver in subject line)

Warbird's Forum:
www.warbirdforum.com
Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com
the blog: www.danford.net
In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SCOTT RITTER SAYS U.S. PLANS JUNE ATTACK ON IRAN [email protected] Naval Aviation 1 February 22nd 05 05:06 PM
Iran's nuclear program Thelasian Military Aviation 107 August 31st 04 06:35 AM
Please Israel come to Iran... X98 Military Aviation 1 May 13th 04 09:47 PM
Iran Says 'Complete Story' Given to Inspectors Dav1936531 Military Aviation 0 April 25th 04 12:42 PM
Israeli Air Force to lose Middle East Air Superiority Capability to the Saudis in the near future Jack White Military Aviation 71 September 21st 03 02:58 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.