If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Marc Ramsey wrote:
Mark James Boyd wrote: Marc Ramsey wrote: No, I'm saying (based on experience) it's a lot easier to let yourself slip (well, actually skid) into a dangerous uncoordinated turn from a shallow bank, than it is from a steeper bank. Hmmm...this could be true. It may be that rudder authority is pretty good at low speeds, and with light foot pressures. At higher speeds, the foot pressure required to really change the airspeeds dramatically on the wingtips may make skids less likely to happen by mistake. If one believes uncoordinated flight is the sole cause of stall/spin/spiral close to the ground, then only rudder is the culprit. I don't think this is the case... It is far safer to be in a properly coordinated turn with a 40 to 50 degree bank angle. Every glider I've ever flown gives a much better warning of impending departure in a tight turn, plus the visual (nose above horizon) and physical (G forces slacking off) cues are much more pronounced. The US Glider Flying Handbook recommends medium banks in the pattern, and 1/4 to 1/2 mile pattern legs (distance from runway). I'm gonna stick with this myself. And how many pilots did this save from a spin? How many pilots have died because of spins from the 40-50 degree bank angle vs. the shallow bank angle? Most pilots die spinning on the base to final turn, and they almost always manage to do it from a slow shallow turn, rather than a slow steep turn. Hmmm...you made me look at the accident reports again. A third possibility came up. In some cases it seems that the glider may have never fully stalled, but simply overbanked, and the pilot didn't stop the overbanking tendency, and went into a steep spiral nose down. There were 11 fatal accidents in the pattern caused by stall/spin/spiral since 1990. One, on Aug 10, 1996, was simply a C.G. to rearward. Aug 12, 01 bank, stall/spin, downwind to base, tight pattern Jan 28, 01 60 deg left bank, 45 down, but ailerons were right turn Oct 4, 96 45 deg bank, 60 deg dive Jul 31, 96 sharp left turn, then steep descent Jun 29, 96 steep left turn, stall Sep 14, 95 left turn, stall during 180 after contest May 21, 94 steep right turn, then spin May 3, 94 flat skidding downwind to base, two month old pilot license May 12, 91 left turn to final, stall Sep 2, 90 180 deg climbing 180 after contest One flat skidding turn, the others were in a bank. At least one looks like an aileron spin (this can be done with feet off the rudders completely, but is very hard to time correctly). Several don't look like spins at all, but overbanking that led to a steep spiral close to the ground. In others, it seems possible the steep bank was after the spin entry, perhaps not before it. Eric pointed out that past 45 degrees, many gliders just don't have enough elevator to stall. This may be true, but it seems at least some of these were overbanking, a dragging aileron, and steep spirals instead. But, hey, we can agree to disagree, as long as we're not in the same glider... Well, for now anyway, I can't see myself doing steep banks in the pattern. And since the FAA says so, I'm gonna teach no more than medium banks, and mild or moderate roll rates. At the recommended pattern size, I don't see why this isn't sufficient. I think we all agree that low and slow is no way to have a long life...we just disagree whether most of these accidents are caused by bad rudder(I don't think so) or by coarse application of dragging aileron/overbanking... -- ------------+ Mark Boyd Avenal, California, USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
SR22 Spin Recovery | gwengler | Piloting | 9 | September 24th 04 07:31 AM |
Spin Training | JJ Sinclair | Soaring | 6 | February 16th 04 04:49 PM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |