If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
http://www.aopa.org/asf/publications/sa06.html
Thanks, Juan. An excellent article! -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 02:30:11 GMT, George Patterson
wrote: karl gruber wrote: That's what I said. The guerrilla with the grinder takes off so much material that it can only be "overhauled" three times. Twice. Overhaul at 5 years, again at 10 years, and at 15, they're too small to redo. If they need seals, but the blades are in spec why run them through the grinder? Mine get a yearly, or when ever needed polishing with 200 grit and crocus(sp?) cloth to smooth and shine the leading edge. Other than looking like they need painting after a years flying they rarely ever need dressing. OTOH you do have to be careful about winter flying with snow and slush. When I replaced the 20 some year old, 2-blade prop with a 3-blade the old one was still well within spec. I don't recall as it had ever been reshaped, but it had been through several overhauls where the seals were replaced. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
You seem to be implying that blades should somehow be overhauled to come out
as new, as if they were engines being overhauled to factory specs. On what do you base this? I've attended seminars given by prop shops with decades of experience explaining, with ample documentation, both visual and written, all the things a prop goes through in flight and on the ground, the stresses it withstands, etc. I've also seen firsthand what a prop blade failure can do to an engine and aircraft. Why anyone would want to cut corners on prop overhauls and maintenance on the basis of statements such as "guerrilla eye" is beyond me. "karl gruber" wrote in message oups.com... That's what I said. The guerrilla with the grinder takes off so much material that it can only be "overhauled" three times. Even with perfect rock chip free blades. The other problem is the grinding is done without templates, completely by guerrilla eye. The blades NEVER come out as good as new. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
My pleasure.
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:k8cZe.362784$_o.101500@attbi_s71... http://www.aopa.org/asf/publications/sa06.html Thanks, Juan. An excellent article! -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Life is boring Jay. Just keep running it till it looses a blade and
rattle the engine off the mount (this might shift your C/G to WAYYY aft). Take note off how many hours it took to get to that point and report back. : ^). It's been a boring day... Bryan "The Monk" Chaisone |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 02:30:11 GMT, George Patterson
wrote: karl gruber wrote: That's what I said. The guerrilla with the grinder takes off so much material that it can only be "overhauled" three times. Twice. Overhaul at 5 years, again at 10 years, and at 15, they're too small to redo. Hmmm. Once upon a time I maintained a bunch of Pt 135 (mandatory propeller/engine overhaul) airplanes with "Brand H" (5 years BTW for the ones I am familiar with has changed to 6 years since they started painting the inside of the hub) compact-hub props. Blade's leading edges and faces dressed & painted EVERY 100 hours (or at 50 if they looked really scabby), overhauled every 4-5 years (happens when you put 400-500 hrs on per year). Only "new" blades that I had scrapped after repeated o-haul were for not meeting the min. OD of the blade shank. This shank is required to be mechanically rolled (reducing the OD) and the roll marks mechanically removed (reducing the OD further) at each overhaul on many compact-hub props. As you've indicated, this occurred typically at the third overhaul, but technically has nothing to do with somebody randomly grinding material off of the blades. Blade grinding is more art than science, and a decent grinder can eval and remove a minimal amount of material from a blade that has been properly maintained and repaired. FOD, including repeated operations from unimproved surfaces (or "hard" water on floatplanes), and corrosion from improper conversion coating/painting (or not maintaining the paint/conversion coating) can drastically reduce blade life (by requiring more material to be removed). But that is NOT the fault of the guy doing the grinding. BTW, after one of my employers purchased the prop shop that had been doing 90% of my propeller work over the years, I gained a lot more insight into the whole overhaul procedure. As Mr. Weir had mentioned repeatedly, an AP/IA cannot ground an aircraft, but this alleged AP/IA could/can/does choose not to perform an annual inspection on a constant-speed propeller that hadn't been torn-down, corrosion-inspected, and re-sealed within a 10 year period. BTW, that practice was in place many years before I had access to a "company" prop shop. Regards; TC snip |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
As Mr. Weir had mentioned repeatedly, an AP/IA cannot ground an
aircraft, but this alleged AP/IA could/can/does choose not to perform an annual inspection on a constant-speed propeller that hadn't been torn-down, corrosion-inspected, and re-sealed within a 10 year period. Do you think that's the right way to go? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
On 24 Sep 2005 16:38:16 -0700, "Flyingmonk" wrote:
Life is boring Jay. Just keep running it till it looses a blade and rattle the engine off the mount (this might shift your C/G to WAYYY aft). Take note off how many hours it took to get to that point and report back. : ^). Why grind the blade is there is nothing wrong other than the leanding edge needs polishing. I've seen very old blades that were in great shape (of course they need to be torn down and inspected), but I've seen 100 hour blades that had been flown off water, or our Michigan slush that I figured were beyond dressing out. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com It's been a boring day... Bryan "The Monk" Chaisone |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Roger wrote:
Why grind the blade is there is nothing wrong other than the leanding edge needs polishing. Paint could be hiding cracks. George Patterson Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Gee, Toe, I only said it ONCE, but it sure as hell got repeated enough
times. Jim As Mr. Weir had mentioned repeatedly, an AP/IA cannot ground an aircraft, but this alleged AP/IA could/can/does choose not to perform an annual inspection on a constant-speed propeller that hadn't been torn-down, corrosion-inspected, and re-sealed within a 10 year period. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Engine Balancing and Resonance Vibration Problem | AllanFuller | Owning | 13 | September 12th 05 12:51 AM |
A Rec.Aviation FRS Channel @ Oshkosh this year? | Bob Chilcoat | Piloting | 10 | June 19th 05 03:32 PM |
my ignorance | LCT Paintball | Home Built | 25 | April 9th 05 06:54 PM |
Instrument overhaul - Are all overhauls created equal? | RonLee | Home Built | 1 | February 7th 05 06:35 PM |
Naval Air Refueling Needs Deferred in Air Force Tanker Plan | Henry J Cobb | Military Aviation | 47 | May 22nd 04 03:36 AM |