If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"RST Engineering" wrote: John ... That's a question that I've been mentally rasslin' with for a few years now. Who **is** the reason for the EAA? Is it JUST Experimentals as the name of the organization implies? Are the warbirds a part of it only because the founder of EAA flew warbirds or are they an intrinsic part of it due to the nature of keeping a beast flying for which there are no readily available parts? No need to wrestle with that question. The EAA, like all good organizations everywhere, has a mission statement: "EAA - the Experimental Aircraft Association - is dedicated to serving all of aviation by fostering and encouraging individual participation, high standards and access to the world of flight in an environment that promotes freedom, safety, family and personal fulfillment." "all of aviation" pretty much answers the question. I'd personally rather have an organization that is restricted to homebuilding. I joined my local chapter, found it attended by about 50 members, and learned that none of them are building an airplane. I'd rather sit on a park bench and chat with two actual builders than sit around listening to WWII stories. But, I wasn't around to vote when EAA drafted its mission statement. |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
"Smitty" wrote in message news In article , "RST Engineering" wrote: John ... That's a question that I've been mentally rasslin' with for a few years now. Who **is** the reason for the EAA? Is it JUST Experimentals as the name of the organization implies? Are the warbirds a part of it only because the founder of EAA flew warbirds or are they an intrinsic part of it due to the nature of keeping a beast flying for which there are no readily available parts? No need to wrestle with that question. The EAA, like all good organizations everywhere, has a mission statement: "EAA - the Experimental Aircraft Association - is dedicated to serving all of aviation by fostering and encouraging individual participation, high standards and access to the world of flight in an environment that promotes freedom, safety, family and personal fulfillment." "all of aviation" pretty much answers the question. I'd personally rather have an organization that is restricted to homebuilding. I joined my local chapter, found it attended by about 50 members, and learned that none of them are building an airplane. I'd rather sit on a park bench and chat with two actual builders than sit around listening to WWII stories. But, I wasn't around to vote when EAA drafted its mission statement. FWIW: I've been to three different EAA chapters. One had about 20 people in attendance, and probably 8 planes under construction. Another had probably 40 people with zero planes under construction. The third had at least 60 people, and at least 20 planes under construction. |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Smitty wrote:
I'd personally rather have an organization that is restricted to homebuilding. I joined my local chapter, found it attended by about 50 members, and learned that none of them are building an airplane. I'd rather sit on a park bench and chat with two actual builders than sit around listening to WWII stories. But, I wasn't around to vote when EAA drafted its mission statement. I'm with Smitty. I stopped going to the local chapter meetings. There just wasn't anything there that would help my project along, and I found the constant 'oohs' and 'aahs' over expensive commercial planes and big metal military equipment a little hard to stomach. I haven't noticed very many other builders there the few times I have gone. Not to discount Jay's sentiment, but the EAA has become an aviation glee club, but I want to play ball, not sit on the sidelines. I'd be happy if the biggest flyins still had only one tent, if that. Small tents with normal people telling how they create airplanes with limited resources. The cheering section isn't needed, or desired. The high-dollar tool vendors with their glitzy overproductions are also optional. Hell, anybody can create a masterpiece with enough money to spend on tools. It takes a special type of person to create a perfect bend with a couple 2x4s and a few door hinges. The airshows? Distracting and purposeless, except to demonstrate a building technique or design. As they are...pure useless fluff. But, heh. That's just me. -- This is by far the hardest lesson about freedom. It goes against instinct, and morality, to just sit back and watch people make mistakes. We want to help them, which means control them and their decisions, but in doing so we actually hurt them (and ourselves)." |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Jay, as a long time lurker, I have to agree with much/most of what you
said. EAA allowed me to live vicariously for many years before I could afford to start building. I too read every magazine cover to cover. While I've managed to start a project, regular 2 year moves due to my career + children have put it on hold. On the other hand, I have finally reached the point where I can afford to own and fly a plane and am the proud owner of an experimental that was lovingly created by someone else. I understand others feelings - let it be for builders only. That said, I hope they understand that the great mass of us who have not started/completed a project admire and respect them for their accomplishment and that the EAA lets us support what we all feel is a wonderful sport. I'm a big tent proponent and believe that it allows us to foster and support the dreams of the many and the reality of the few. Jeff Jay Honeck wrote: That's a question that I've been mentally rasslin' with for a few years now. Who **is** the reason for the EAA? Is it JUST Experimentals as the name of the organization implies? Are the warbirds a part of it only because the founder of EAA flew warbirds or are they an intrinsic part of it due to the nature of keeping a beast flying for which there are no readily available parts? Jim, as you know, I tend to get emotional about EAA. I love the organization with all my heart, but would gut parts of it with my bare hands, if I could. Without EAA it's doubtful that my life would have taken the turn(s) it has -- all of them good. ... My children already dream about OSH every winter, Jim, just like we do -- and I want it to be there for them. Please be careful what you do with our beloved organization. It's a living, breathing thing that could be easily harmed -- or killed -- by taking the wrong approach. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NS Norfolk Gate 2 NATOPS - All Hands Memorize Immediately! | Yofuri | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 17th 04 05:38 AM |
19 Sep 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | September 19th 04 11:54 PM |
How I got to Oshkosh (long) | Doug | Owning | 2 | August 18th 03 12:05 AM |
Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Jay Honeck | Owning | 2 | July 24th 03 09:11 PM |
Oshkosh Get together Roster - Sign in, please! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 0 | July 24th 03 04:15 AM |