A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"position & hold" going away



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old August 17th 05, 02:10 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

Slightly, but having another airplane land on top of you delays your
departure even more.


Well, if the visibility is such that the arriving aircraft can't see you and
it lands on top of you, then it's unlikely that sitting kind of sideways
would allow you to see him.


  #52  
Old August 17th 05, 03:39 AM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, if the visibility is such that the arriving aircraft can't see you and
it lands on top of you, then it's unlikely that sitting kind of sideways
would allow you to see him.


It is unwise to =depend= on somebody seeing you. It might not be the
visibility that prevents the arriving aircraft from noticing you, or
perhaps from doing anything about it (one might have taxiied into
position in error, detected later by the laws of physics)

Jose
--
Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe,
except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #53  
Old August 17th 05, 03:44 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jose" wrote in message
t...

It is unwise to =depend= on somebody seeing you.


If you you're not prepared to depend on somebody you're not prepared to
operate at controlled fields or under IFR.


  #54  
Old August 17th 05, 04:21 AM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If you you're not prepared to depend on somebody you're not prepared to
operate at controlled fields or under IFR.


Ok, I'll reword. It's unwise to unnecessarily depend on someone to see you.

Jose
--
Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe,
except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #55  
Old August 17th 05, 04:57 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote

Well, if the visibility is such that the arriving aircraft can't see you

and
it lands on top of you, then it's unlikely that sitting kind of sideways
would allow you to see him.


I don't see why you would think that.

Ever been rear ended, sitting at a stop light, or such? (in a car, of
course)

I have been, and a very hard hit, about 45 mph. When ever I stop now, I
look in my mirror, and if I see that somone is not going to stop, I am ready
to take evasive action, like going off the side of the road, or into another
lane.

It may not work, but I'm sure going to try and avoid that, if I can.

Same thing for sitting sideways, to get a view of the glideslope. If
someone is coming in, and I saw them, I could try to get to the side of the
runway, or back to the taxiway, or into the ditch. At least you would have
a fighting chance to avoid a catastrophe. Sitting straight, some planes
couldn't see squat, so there is a *good* reason for the sideways trick. It
couldn't take more than 3 or 4 seconds to get straight in the first part of
your takeoff roll.
--
Jim in NC


  #56  
Old August 17th 05, 11:30 AM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

Slightly, but having another airplane land on top of you delays your
departure even more.



Well, if the visibility is such that the arriving aircraft can't see you and
it lands on top of you, then it's unlikely that sitting kind of sideways
would allow you to see him.



The OPs point was that he could see the plane approaching and taxi off
the runway out of the way.

Matt
  #57  
Old August 17th 05, 12:38 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Morgans" wrote in message
...

I don't see why you would think that.


Logic causes me to think that.



Ever been rear ended, sitting at a stop light, or such? (in a car, of
course)

I have been, and a very hard hit, about 45 mph. When ever I stop now, I
look in my mirror, and if I see that somone is not going to stop, I am
ready to take evasive action, like going off the side of the road, or into
another lane.

It may not work, but I'm sure going to try and avoid that, if I can.

Same thing for sitting sideways, to get a view of the glideslope. If
someone is coming in, and I saw them, I could try to get to the side of
the runway, or back to the taxiway, or into the ditch. At least you would
have a fighting chance to avoid a catastrophe.


Why can't the incoming pilot see you and go around?



Sitting straight, some planes couldn't see squat, so there is a *good*
reason
for the sideways trick. It couldn't take more than 3 or 4 seconds to get
straight
in the first part of your takeoff roll.


How long it takes depends on the airplane. "Position and Hold" means "taxi
onto the departure runway in takeoff position and hold." If you hold in a
position that requires additional ground maneuvering before beginning your
takeoff roll you have not complied with the instruction.


  #58  
Old August 17th 05, 12:39 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

The OPs point was that he could see the plane approaching and taxi off the
runway out of the way.


Why can't the approaching plane see the OP's plane and go around?


  #59  
Old August 17th 05, 01:51 PM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If you hold in a
position that requires additional ground maneuvering before beginning your
takeoff roll you have not complied with the instruction.


However if you can begin your takeoff roll from the position in which
you have stopped, and straighten out =on= your takeoff roll, you have
complied with the instruction.

Jose
--
Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe,
except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #60  
Old August 17th 05, 02:12 PM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You're arguing for the sake of the argument. I quit.
--
Jim in NC
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Parachute fails to save SR-22 Capt.Doug Piloting 72 February 10th 05 05:14 AM
Position and Hold at uncontrolled field dave Piloting 42 February 26th 04 01:25 AM
Hold "as published"? John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 83 November 13th 03 03:19 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.