A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

low vs high tow



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 24th 14, 02:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
John Firth[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 57
Default low vs high tow

Since the 2-33, whatever it's demerits may be, will continue
as a basic trainer, there is much to be said for going low tow.
The student is less likely to allow the glider to
get too high, and the instructor whose view is restricted
downwards can see the towplane at all times.
That brings us to the argument over transition to high tow
before release......
JMF

  #2  
Old February 24th 14, 03:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,124
Default low vs high tow

On Monday, February 24, 2014 9:25:13 AM UTC-5, firsys wrote:
Since the 2-33, whatever it's demerits may be, will continue as a basic trainer, there is much to be said for going low tow. The student is less likely to allow the glider to get too high, and the instructor whose view is restricted downwards can see the towplane at all times. That brings us to the argument over transition to high tow before release...... JMF


No need to change position. When in proper low tow position, the ropes goes stright forward. If it goes up relative to the glider, the glider was too low.
You have to be very low before the rope can hit the glider, so much so that a bowing down will be obvious.
We point this out during training so pilots can evaluate whether theri position was right while verifying that the rope is released- also easier to see than in high tow.
UH
  #3  
Old February 24th 14, 05:26 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
JS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,384
Default low vs high tow

With limited trim capabilities, it takes quite a bit of forward stick pressure in level tow in a 2-33. Low tow, even more pressure.
What would happen if a 2-33 pilot let go of the stick in low tow?
Jim
  #4  
Old February 24th 14, 06:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,124
Default low vs high tow

On Monday, February 24, 2014 12:26:13 PM UTC-5, JS wrote:
With limited trim capabilities, it takes quite a bit of forward stick pressure in level tow in a 2-33. Low tow, even more pressure. What would happen if a 2-33 pilot let go of the stick in low tow? Jim


No noticeable difference in stick force required between high and low tow in 2-33.
UH
  #5  
Old February 25th 14, 04:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
GC[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 107
Default low vs high tow

On 25/02/2014 04:26, JS wrote:
With limited trim capabilities, it takes quite a bit of forward stick
pressure in level tow in a 2-33. Low tow, even more pressure. What
would happen if a 2-33 pilot let go of the stick in low tow? Jim


I'd guess it would be exactly the same result as if he let go the stick
in any other glider when there's significant load on the stick.
Probably impressive but hardly surprising. Unlike letting go the stick
in a in-trim Std Cirrus or Mini-Nimbus on final glide. Impressive AND
surprising!

C'mon Jim. Why would a pilot in any glider let go the stick at any time
it's under load - whether on tow or for any other reason?

Some of this stuff about low tow gets ridiculous - and just confirms my
feelings about the basis for the opposition.

GC
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apollo 13 pix last batch includes .par2s - "Apollo 13 Saturn V with boilerplate spacecraft during transfer move from High Bay 2 to High Bay 3 ap13-trfr-noID.jpg" yEnc (1/1) [90K] hielan' laddie Aviation Photos 0 September 12th 08 03:17 PM
Apollo 13 pix last batch includes .par2s - "Apollo 13 Saturn V with boilerplate spacecraft during transfer move from High Bay 2 to High Bay 3 ap13-rollaround2-noID.jpg" yEnc (1/1) [97K] hielan' laddie Aviation Photos 0 September 12th 08 03:17 PM
Apollo 13 pix last batch includes .par2s - "Apollo 13 Saturn V with boilerplate spacecraft during transfer move from High Bay 2 to High Bay 3 ap13-KSC-69P-684.jpg" yEnc (1/1) [109K] hielan' laddie Aviation Photos 0 September 12th 08 03:17 PM
Apollo 13 pix last batch includes .par2s - "Apollo 13 Saturn V with boilerplate spacecraft during transfer move from High Bay 2 to High Bay 3 ap13-KSC-69P-683.jpg" yEnc (1/1) [121K] hielan' laddie Aviation Photos 0 September 12th 08 03:17 PM
IVO pireps wanted.. high performance/high speed... Dave S Home Built 8 June 2nd 04 04:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.