If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Helium bubbles used to show bird aerodynamics
Martin Gregorie wrote on 3/19/2020 8:11 AM:
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 06:23:40 -0700, jjdk737 wrote: Are these lifting tails creating upward lift during low speed flight, close to stall speed? Or... are they only providing upward forces at high speed during the climb, transitioning to a downward force during slow speed flight after powerloss? So yes, all three types glided with the tailplane providing lift. All free flight competition models are better thought of as tandem wing aircraft with both wings providing lift. That was more obvious in the old days, when very large tailplanes, up to 35-50% of the wing area, with short moment arms, 3-3.5 times wing chord, were used. Now tailplanes are around 20% of the wing area and the moment arms are about 5 times the wing chord. All free flight models are trimmed to fly at minimum sink trim and to, hopefully, stay in the thermal you launch them into. I flew hand-launch, towed, and power FF in the early '60s. After a detour to race sports cars, I ended up sitting in gliders instead building them. How do you determine the tail is lifting in gliding flight? And wouldn't be more efficient to have the larger wing provide all the lift, and just use the tailplane to provide stability? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Helium bubbles used to show bird aerodynamics
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:28:33 -0700, Eric Greenwell wrote:
I flew hand launch gliders in early60's. My best glider had a planform identical to the original Discus. It was called the "Sweepette". The cover on this article shows the 1960 version: https://indoornewsandviews.files.wor...0/inav-113.pdf I know it well: Lee Hines has been a good friend ever since 1983, when I was on the way back from the Australian WC and stopped over on my way home to fly in some Californian comps. I did the MaxMen's comp at Taft and the Sierra Cup at Sacramento, travelling with Lee. I got 2nd in in the Sierra Cup that year - an epic event with 10 rounds flown Saturday and Sunday morning. Flyoffs started at 1:30 PM on a hot, thermally afternoon. We flew 4,5,6 and 7 minute flyoffs before those with clockwork timers dropped out en mass. By the 10 minute round it was cooling off and only Walt Ghio and I were left. We both blobbed it, but I dropped more than he did. Halcyon Days! I wonder if Wil Schumann was inspired by the Sweepette, or some earlier version of that planform? Lee seems to have developed the Sweepette in the late 60s and got the Model Of The Year award for it in 1970. I have a copy of Wil's article on modifying an ASW-12 so he could fly it in Standard Class, and that modification included his new planform, but annoyingly, the article doesn't show a date. The ASW-12 was introduced in 1965, so its at least possible that Wil was first with that planform. AFAIK Lee has never followed developments in fullsize gliding in any detail. He was always more interested in Formula 1 GP racing, and spent a season as a Goodyear gofer (and got into the partys) when Jimmy Clark, Graham Hill, etc were to top drivers. Do you know when Wil was flying that modified ASW-12? -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Helium bubbles used to show bird aerodynamics
"How do you determine the tail is lifting in gliding flight?" Agree. Do we have wind tunnel testing to prove the theory that your fixed stab is always providing upwards forces on the aft end of the fuselage? I used do some free flight modeling. Mostly Dick Mathis designs. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Helium bubbles used to show bird aerodynamics
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:43:45 -0700, Eric Greenwell wrote:
How do you determine the tail is lifting in gliding flight? And wouldn't be more efficient to have the larger wing provide all the lift, and just use the tailplane to provide stability? Good question, but I think flight stability gives the answer for FF models. They're all trimmed for minimum sink, it being a duration event with distance covered being a matter of wind and thermal strength and what time you put on the d/t timer, so they all glide slowly at min.sink to maximise flight time. We also know from wind tunnel tests, etc. that the Centre of Pressure (CP) of almost all airfoils is around 33% chord at slow speed. So, for FF models, if your CG is behind 33%, then the tail *must* be producing lift for stable flight. Similarly, we know that while aircraft trimmed that way can be extremely stable, they aren't necessarily controllable, but that they are if the CG is in front of the CP, which requires downforce from the tail for stable flight, so all manned aircraft are set up like that. This is particularly obvious if you look at any of the earlier Boeing airliners: the tailplane has quite a noticeable negative incidence *and* has an inverted cambered airfoil, to the amount of downforce it produces will be considerable. Back to gliders, yes, the less downforce you need from the tailplane, the more efficient the glide becomes, but the more squirrelly it becomes as you move the CG back. The other way of getting efficiency is through leverage. If you lengthen the tail boom you need progressively less downforce at its rear end to balance the nose-down tendency. This alone means the tail needs to produce less downforce, and so reduces the drag the goes with producing it. It also means you can make the tailplane smaller, so reducing its surface drag. Putting all the surface in the wing seems to produce stability issues, which I won't pretend to understand. All you can say is that tailless gliders have all had issues, mostly connected with high speed stability. I remember Rudy Opitz reporting that his father found that the Horten SIV.b developed a nasty high speed pitch oscillation well below Vne and that this affected his on-task speed. The Akaflieg Karlsruhe's AK-10 also had this problem. It has affected powered tailless aircraft too - that's what killed Geoffrey De Havilland in the DH.108 and nearly got Eric "Winkle" Brown as well. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Helium bubbles used to show bird aerodynamics
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 09:33:40 -0700, jjdk737 wrote:
"How do you determine the tail is lifting in gliding flight?" Agree. Do we have wind tunnel testing to prove the theory that your fixed stab is always providing upwards forces on the aft end of the fuselage? I don't have access to a wind tunnel, but Mark Drela does and may will have done that, However, I have photos that have a bearing on it. When I drew up my glider series I made calculations of where the wing wake should be at the tail location and how thick the wake was at that point. I wanted to be sure that the tailplane was outside the wing wake because my flying mates and I had already discovered that an F1A isn't trimmable if the tailplane is inside the wing wake at its normal flight attitude. Anyway, I did the calcs, drew the lines on the CAD screen and adjusted the fuselage height and wing AOA to put the tailplane comfortably below the wing wake - I like zero dihedral inner wing panels with all the dihedral on the shorter tips, which occupy about 1/3 of the semispan, so wing/tail wake interference would be a problem if it ocurred. A long time later I checked this by making a rake to let me see the airflow behind the wing and onto the tailplane. Here's a description and pictures: https://www.gregorie.org/freeflight/..._visualization Notice in both pictures that the streamers are deflected up in front of the tail - I think that's a fairly clear indication that lift is being generated. Here are some wind tunnel pics showing similar effects, but the flow deflection is a lot less because flow velocities will much higher than a FF models gliding speed. An F1A glider's gliding speed is quite low: in flat calm its easy to run alongside and just behind one and then reach in and grab the tail boom just behind the wing is it sinks past your waist. In case it isn't obvious, these models weigh just over 410 grams. They are generally 2.2 to 2.5 metres in span and fly are about 10 mph (16 kph, 4.5 m/s). Sinking speed is around 0.3 m/s, giving a glide ratio of about 1:16. Anyway, here are the wind tunnel links: https://www.aa.washington.edu/AERL/K...hguide/flowviz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIHFkp1aAOI I used do some free flight modeling. Mostly Dick Mathis designs. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Helium bubbles used to show bird aerodynamics
On Thursday, March 19, 2020 at 9:33:44 AM UTC-7, wrote:
"How do you determine the tail is lifting in gliding flight?" Agree. Do we have wind tunnel testing to prove the theory that your fixed stab is always providing upwards forces on the aft end of the fuselage? I used do some free flight modeling. Mostly Dick Mathis designs. There is a misconception that a requirement for stability is that the tail must be providing a downward load. In fact all that is required is that the lift slope of the tail be higher than the wing with increasing angle of attack. That guarantees a righting moment with any angle of attack disturbance. All this talk about free flight models reminds me of family connections. My brother won the world competition in F1B rubber powered free flight a few years back (first US win since the mid '50s). These aircraft have surprisingly sophisticated powertrains using secret and carefully hoarded rubber motors driving folding, feathering, torque sensing prop hubs. The latest have wings that are folded in half for the high speed climb, and unfold for the glide. They typically have lifting tails. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Helium bubbles used to show bird aerodynamics
Absolutely. On a modern glider, this slope goes through zero at the angle of attack of best L/D (zero lift = minimum drag). Below that speed, the tailplane produces lift, above it produces downward force.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Helium bubbles used to show bird aerodynamics
Tango Whisky wrote on 3/21/2020 1:37 AM:
Absolutely. On a modern glider, this slope goes through zero at the angle of attack of best L/D (zero lift = minimum drag). Below that speed, the tailplane produces lift, above it produces downward force. Curiously, that is not (we're told) how the model gliders are trimmed: the tail is lifting at minimum sink. That seems inefficient to have a small wing producing lift instead the big wing, with it's lower drag from a larger aspect ratio. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Helium bubbles used to show bird aerodynamics
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 01:37:35 -0700, Tango Whisky wrote:
Absolutely. On a modern glider, this slope goes through zero at the angle of attack of best L/D (zero lift = minimum drag). Below that speed, the tailplane produces lift, above it produces downward force. At a slight tangent: If you're in a COVID-19 lockdown and need something to do with your hands, you can do a lot worse that teach yourself some basic flight stability rules while having fun making stuff. All you need is: - a copy of "Circular Airflow" by Frank Zaic ABE Books https://www.abebooks.com have a few copies if you don't have one (and you won't unless you were a keen FF model flyer). Other second hand bookstores should also have copies - a sheet or two of 1/16" balsa - modelling clay or electrical solder to use as nose weight - some glue (white PVA, cellulose cement or a decent brand of cyanoacrylate such as Zap) - a suitable knife. I like the snap-off blade sort you can find in DIY stores. - maybe some glass-headed pins to hold stuff in place while glue dries The section of the book called "Spiral Stability Demonstration" (starts on page 49 in my copy) shows how to make very simple hand launch gliders and use them to see the effect of side area, vertical and horizontal tail size, etc. The models are small, light and slow enough to be flown in any reasonable sized room or in your garden on a calm day. Its easy enough to extend this to an investigation of CG position relative to wing chord and the associated up or download on the tailplane. Couple of other links: - if you liked experimenting with the Zaic test models, you might like Easy Mini, a small, light catapult launched balsa glider. Its interesting because, when correctly set up, that same fixed trim works at high speed in a spiral climb and equally well after it slows down into a slow floating glide. You can lose these upwards of you fire them into a thermal. They are suitable to use with scout groups, after-school hobby groups, and, of course, young gliding club associates. https://www.gregorie.org/freeflight/easymini/ - a debunking job I did to prove that an ancient Egyptian wooden bird was probably a kids toy or a decoration and certainly not anything that actually flew. Proving that was a lot of fun: https://www.gregorie.org/freeflight/saqqara_bird -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Helium bubbles used to show bird aerodynamics
On Sat, 21 Mar 2020 06:40:45 -0700, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Curiously, that is not (we're told) how the model gliders are trimmed: the tail is lifting at minimum sink. That seems inefficient to have a small wing producing lift instead the big wing, with it's lower drag from a larger aspect ratio. Its not as inefficient as you might think: several people, as well as myself, have found that a well designed model with a long tail moment has a fairly low coefficient of lift on the tail. At a normal glide trim the parasitic drag of the tail is greater then its drag due to lift. The tailplane is working at a Cl of around 0.05, which puts it pretty much in the centre of its minimum drag bucket, while the wing will be operating at a Cl of 1.1 - 1.2. We don't care what the glide slope of a gliding model is like since its not going anyplace, just circling in the thermal it was launched into. All we care about trimming it to glide at min. sink speed. Contests are won and lost on total airtime recorded during the event. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Check Out This Crazy Shot Of A C-17 Ingesting A Big Bird On Takeoff At The Avalon Air Show [1/2] - C-17 bird strike.jpg (1/1) | Miloch | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 5th 19 04:44 AM |
Helium Balloon Sizing | Barney Einstein | Piloting | 5 | February 5th 16 02:36 AM |
Saturday 072807 in Oshkosh Pt 6 - Warbird show pix I forgot to post earlier [10/33] - "Bird Dog.jpg" yEnc (1/1) | Just Plane Noise[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 31st 07 10:48 PM |
Wing Bubbles and re-surfacing | Steve Hill | Soaring | 10 | December 10th 04 10:34 PM |
Restoring bubbles... | The Raven | Restoration | 4 | July 7th 03 06:07 PM |