A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Meigs now enjoyed by all!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old July 6th 05, 02:07 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

So by your definition, 9/11 was nothing also, a wreck is a wreck.


Please show me where he defined 9/11 as nothing.



This place has had more wrecks on a percentage of operations basis than
ORD.


Does it? What are the operations counts for ORD and LL22 and how many
wrecks have they had in the same time period?


Let's see, ORD does 100K's a year, LL22 maybe 10-20 a day.
During my 15 years in the area, Wrecks:
LL22-Two
ORD- an AMR jet hits the dirt, short of the rr. No injuries, but if you
miss the concrete and raise dirt clouds, thats a wreck in my book.
A decent record, but given Murphy's rule maybe a foam-er is due.

JG

  #82  
Old July 6th 05, 02:20 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Well-well, read 'em and weep:


Just slide that stack of poker chips over now:


"It was almost like they were an independent nation out there, with
**********no accountability**************
to the taxpayers," Schillerstrom said.

That has changed, he said.
The


*********** Airport Authority now collects about $6.5 million annually
in realestate taxes--about 20 percent of its $29.9 million a year
budget. **************

Over $10 from each person, child, senior, invalid, in the county-JG

None
of the property-tax revenue is used to pay airport operating costs.
Instead, the funds are used to retire debt.

The $12.8 million in long-term debt is scheduled to be paid off in
2007, at which time the property-tax levy could be cut in half, Goodwin
said.


COULD, like, maybe or if you say pretty please. Here comes a BUT, oh
a hangar for the pretty planes.


But the airport expects to borrow money to finance the construction of
a hangar addition. Goodwin said he is cautious about promising to
eliminate the need for property-tax funds until the airport is
debt-free and until a proposed high-technology research center on
airport-owned land along Roosevelt Road and Fabyan Parkway begins
generating revenues for the authority.

(SO, don't bet the kids college tuition on it. The TECH PARK
is a JOKE, miles away from the tollway and high office vacancies
already.-JG)


But for the first time, officials say, it ****appears*** that operating
revenues from hangar leases, the sale of aviation fuel and other fees
are enough to cover the day-to-day costs of running the airport.

****** Again with the APPEARS ****** do they cover or not?
Anyways, Vamanos!


(ALOT of Maybes, and It Appears)


  #83  
Old July 6th 05, 02:32 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
oups.com...

The main HQ is 3 miles away with a FOUR bay station, plenty close by
modern standards.


Apparently the people in this community didn't think so.



This addition was built after one of the wrecks.


So you concluded it was built to serve the airport?



Anyways, most residential areas can get by with VOLUNTEER FF's.


Obviously this one chose not to.



The big money corporate crowd needs the pros for their edifaces. But thats
another fish to fry.


Didn't you say this was a residential air park? How many corporate aircraft
use it?



I assume so, H20 not as effective on avgas. Anyways, they were the
special trucks you see on airport squads.


So you don't know. You seem to have assumed most of what you "know" about
aviation.



They could as in "there's no wall keeping them from leaving" don't know
about FAA regs.


Do you form all your opinions in a state of ignorance?



Except when they wreck and it takes 30 minutes for MDW trucks to
respond.


What do MDW trucks have to do with CGX?



Oh well, the construction crains are still swinging across LSD, the
condo folk can sleep well and the building boom continues, Miss Ya!


What kept the condo folks awake previously?



The common folk are the non-pilot SWA'ers.


I agree. Pilots are uncommon folks.



If MDW gets too busy then...
maybe Romeoville or.. Peotone will be open.


Perhaps Daley should have thought of that before he closed a perfectly good
airport.


  #84  
Old July 6th 05, 02:47 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
oups.com...

Let's see, ORD does 100K's a year, LL22 maybe 10-20 a day.
During my 15 years in the area, Wrecks:
LL22-Two
ORD- an AMR jet hits the dirt, short of the rr.


Actual figures, please, and cite your source so they can be verified.



No injuries, but if you
miss the concrete and raise dirt clouds, thats a wreck in my book.


Well need something better than your uninformed opinion. There may have
been no actual "wrecks" at all. A search of the NTSB database back to
1/1/90 produced no hits.


  #85  
Old July 6th 05, 04:33 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Andrew

Your post appeared the right font size, for the first time in a while. Did
you change something, or did I?
--
Jim in NC

  #86  
Old July 6th 05, 04:35 AM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
oups.com...


Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

So by your definition, 9/11 was nothing also, a wreck is a wreck.


Please show me where he defined 9/11 as nothing.



This place has had more wrecks on a percentage of operations basis

than
ORD.


Does it? What are the operations counts for ORD and LL22 and how many
wrecks have they had in the same time period?


Let's see, ORD does 100K's a year, LL22 maybe 10-20 a day.
During my 15 years in the area, Wrecks:
LL22-Two
ORD- an AMR jet hits the dirt, short of the rr. No injuries, but if you
miss the concrete and raise dirt clouds, thats a wreck in my book.
A decent record, but given Murphy's rule maybe a foam-er is due.

JG


I seem to remember a huge cloud of smoke upon leaving work one day back in
the '80s. Hundreds died. Based on your twisted thought process I guess you
should be lobbying to have O'Hare closed.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FAA Goes after Chicago on Meigs Orval Fairbairn Piloting 110 September 28th 06 11:59 AM
FAA Goes after Chicago on Meigs Orval Fairbairn Home Built 48 October 5th 04 11:46 AM
FAA Goes after Chicago on Meigs Orval Fairbairn General Aviation 46 October 5th 04 11:46 AM
a brief blurb on meigs Tune2828 Piloting 0 January 20th 04 04:04 PM
Emergency landing at Meigs Sunday Thomas J. Paladino Jr. Piloting 22 August 3rd 03 03:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.