If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 14:43:58 GMT, Dave Hyde wrote:
Roger Halstead wrote: I guess you'd need some sort of plastic overlay for the airspeed indicator to remind you of the new critial speeds. They don't change all that much. You leave them set for the shorter wing. ... I think someone else said this too, and I find it confusing. If they don't change that much, why have the extensions? Just for more fuel? They can be used for additional fuel and they create a higher aspect ratio for greater speed at altitude than the short wing.. They also offer a bit more climb, and a bit slower landing. OTOH although the landing is slower, fowler flaps and the extended wing only lower the landing speed a few MPH The airpseed indicator could certainly be marked that way and inspectors may approve it, but it seems like the long-wing version would be more critical for safety numbers. Vne would likely be lower It's not. That depends more on other factors for the long wing(*), and maneuvering speed will be lower as well, It is by a little assuming the extensions add any lift at all. They do. Stall speed for *both* wings is important. Stall with the longer wing is only a couple MPH slower. (*) Assuming it's flutter that sets Vne, which is a big assumption. Kinda, sorta...flutter is one. Various portions of the structure are another. As Roger Halstead (K8RI EN73 & ARRL Life Member) www.rogerhalstead.com N833R World's oldest Debonair? (S# CD-2) Dave 'corner speed' Hyde |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
new theory of flight released Sept 2004 | Mark Oliver | Aerobatics | 1 | October 5th 04 10:20 PM |