If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"John Mason" wrote in message ... I don't like the idea of a touring motor glider. I don't see the point, they don't glide well enough to be much use as a glider except in exceptional conditions. Hmmm, generalizations? The Stemme S10-VT tours quite nicely, thank you. It also handles adverse conditions, such as being able to taxi out in 30+ knot crosswinds with no wing walker, stuff that would keep most gliders in their trailers (I'm not recommending this BTW, but I watched 4 Stemmes do it at Cedar City, UT a couple of years back - - one being mine.). The point you failed to see is that it glides well too, with a claimed L/D of 50 to1 (but most owners find 47 is probably closer), no matter, it is still a capable glider even in relatively light conditions. Does okay in exceptional conditions as well (g). Okay, there are lessor performing touring MGs as well. Most do what they were designed to do and their owners enjoy them . . . *that's* the point. -- bumper ZZ (reverse all after @) "Dare to be different . . . circle in sink." |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"bumper" wrote in message ... "John Mason" wrote in message ... I don't like the idea of a touring motor glider. I don't see the point, they don't glide well enough to be much use as a glider except in exceptional conditions. Hmmm, generalizations? The Stemme S10-VT tours quite nicely, thank you. It also handles adverse conditions, such as being able to taxi out in 30+ knot crosswinds with no wing walker, stuff that would keep most gliders in their trailers (I'm not recommending this BTW, but I watched 4 Stemmes do it at Cedar City, UT a couple of years back - - one being mine.). The point you failed to see is that it glides well too, with a claimed L/D of 50 to1 (but most owners find 47 is probably closer), no matter, it is still a capable glider even in relatively light conditions. Does okay in exceptional conditions as well (g). Okay, there are lessor performing touring MGs as well. Most do what they were designed to do and their owners enjoy them . . . *that's* the point. -- bumper ZZ (reverse all after @) "Dare to be different . . . circle in sink." The Stemme is not a touring motor glider, according to the UK definition it is a self launching motor glider. I don't have issue with your comments on the Stemme. What I was referring to was for example the Grob 109b, the Dimona the Falkes and Fourniers etc. They all are pretty awful gliders, especially in the UK where we need good min sink figures and low thermaling speeds and good glide angles. To elaborate on what I meant when I say I don't see the point: Why get an aircraft that purports to be a glider when it isn't? There are perfectly good touring aeroplanes around - ah! but they are usually more expensive, perhaps that is the point. You can buy an aeroplane cheaply in the misguided hope of being able to glide sometimes as a bonus. I suspect that is the reasoning behind the purchase. I would say though that unless you can use it properly as a glider and not just for field landing practice or the occasional strong wave flight then it is pointless to have the gliding capability as it detracts from the cruising ability and adds cost. You can see the cost/benefit equation from the Diamond aircraft range. I think if the owners made better decisions and didn't buy these horrid aircraft then they would enjoy the alternatives much more. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
From: "John Mason"
To elaborate on what I meant when I say I don't see the point: Why get an aircraft that purports to be a glider when it isn't? How about the case where one can only get a glider license due to inability to pass the physical exam required for powered planes. Or perhaps the significantly less cost/hassle of only needing a glider license with a self launch endorsement. Mind that I am not trying to imply that the above is necessarily a great idea, but for some it could be important and OK. -Doug |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
At 12:00 31 December 2003, Doug Hoffman wrote:
From: 'John Mason' To elaborate on what I meant when I say I don't see the point: Why get an aircraft that purports to be a glider when it isn't? What if a club needs a new towplane? (Assuming the RV has sufficient power and climb rate to tow safely.) Then, when it might not be towing, it could be used for instructions in landings and cross country flying. I think some European clubs use touring-style motor gliders for tugs. Just a thought. Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
John Mason wrote:
Not a great idea. Turboprops cost, even in the cheapest incarnation several hundred thousand $s and the lowest powered engines available are really big and heavy compared to what is needed. A warp drive proton engine would be suitable though. I don't like the idea of a touring motor glider. I don't see the point, they don't glide well enough to be much use as a glider except in exceptional conditions. Do you count the Carat as a touring motorglider? If not, what is your definition of "touring"? -- ----- change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Perhaps there is no point for a MG in the UK which can be transversed in an
hour but here...... Oh the pleasure of flying under power for 700 NM to your destination and not talk to a living soul. Ah ... the quiet, the peace. The ability to fly past Mt. McKinley and shut off the motor and soar and soar and soar. Ah ... the pleasure. The ability to launch when nobody else is flying and capture conditions that no others can capture on that day. Ah ... the satisfaction. The thrill of seeing lennies and launching at 15:00 to greet the rising air - when all others are already back. Ah ... the beauty. Most of all, if you don't see the point, then perhaps you are one of those mechanical pilots who can not see the beauty and excitement each time you take to the air. Allan Former Katana Extreme owner and eagerly awaiting Carat 012 "Eric Greenwell" wrote in message ... John Mason wrote: Not a great idea. Turboprops cost, even in the cheapest incarnation several hundred thousand $s and the lowest powered engines available are really big and heavy compared to what is needed. A warp drive proton engine would be suitable though. I don't like the idea of a touring motor glider. I don't see the point, they don't glide well enough to be much use as a glider except in exceptional conditions. Do you count the Carat as a touring motorglider? If not, what is your definition of "touring"? -- ----- change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"John Mason" wrote in message ... The Stemme is not a touring motor glider, according to the UK definition it is a self launching motor glider. I don't have issue with your comments on the Stemme. What I was referring to was for example the Grob 109b, the Dimona the Falkes and Fourniers etc. They all are pretty awful gliders, especially in the UK where we need good min sink figures and low thermaling speeds and good glide angles. What are the various UK catagories/definitions? I'm new to soaring, having only had my glider rating since'98, so I may goof up on this. Please correct me if I'm wrong. In the US, I'm aware of the following catagories/defenitions: Glider - - sometimes used to describe the WWII and prior, low performance "tow it up - glide back down" class. Term often also used to refer to high performance sailplanes too - - this is confusing :c) Sailplane - - still with no engine, performance is high enough that lift can be used to stay up, gain altitude, or fly cross country. Turbo - - as above but with a small sustainer engine not usually used for self-launch, can be used to sustain or self-retrieve. Self-launch sailplane - - Emphasis is on soaring. Propulsion system cleverly designed to be strong enough to provide robust take-off and climb. Engine/prop combination may be geared toward max climb performance. This, and sometimes minimal fuel supply, tends to make this aircraft not so suitable for prolonged power operation. Long distances may still be covered, in weak or no lift conditions, using saw-tooth mode. When engine/prop is stowed and gear retracted, drag is minimized and ship looks like other high performace sailplanes. Motor glider - - a glider or sailplane with a larger more capable engine and fuel supply. Configuration is usually tractor and sustained operation under power is accomodated in the design, though this is typically at the expense of reduced soaring performance. L/D may be compromised by cooling drag or feathered prop drag. Usually has tricycle or conventional gear, which may be fixed or retractable, to allow for convenient ground handling and taxiing. Until now (?) I wasn't aware of a sub-catagory called "touring motor glider" which would exclude other motor gliders types. Though of course I've heard and used the term "touring motor glider" and know that both self-launchers and motorgliders have been used for touring. The Stemme, which you say is *not* a touring motorglider, seems to fit squarely over both the last two catagories I listed . . . at least in terms of benefits. The S10 retains most or all of the good soaring performance of a self-laucher while still keeping most all the benefits of any other motor glider I can think of. As such, the Stemme is perhaps most uniquely qualified to be the ultimate "touring motorglider". Unfortunately, like most things that fly, there are some compormises. In Stemme's case, it is relatively expensive and complex. all the best, -- bumper ZZ (reverse all after @) "Dare to be different . . . circle in sink." ASH26E . . . self-launch S10-VT . . . touring motor glider (?) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
ADP wrote:
Perhaps there is no point for a MG in the UK which can be transversed in an hour but here...... Oh the pleasure of flying under power for 700 NM to your destination and not talk to a living soul. Ah ... the quiet, the peace. The ability to fly past Mt. McKinley and shut off the motor and soar and soar and soar. Ah ... the pleasure. The ability to launch when nobody else is flying and capture conditions that no others can capture on that day. Ah ... the satisfaction. The thrill of seeing lennies and launching at 15:00 to greet the rising air - when all others are already back. Ah ... the beauty. Most of all, if you don't see the point, then perhaps you are one of those mechanical pilots who can not see the beauty and excitement each time you take to the air. The two "touring" MGs (Ximango and Taifun 17) here (eastern Washington State, USA) make good wave explorers: good speed against a headwind to the wave, two pilots get to go, heat from the idling motor to warm the pilots and keep the frost off the canopy, taxi well in the wind. They make adequate thermal soarers, too, about like a Blanik in cross-country performance. And a good pilot will make a longer cross-country in one of them than in a Blanik, because he isn't worried about a retrieve. -- ----- change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
One of the more remarkable flights from last summer
was a 500k flight done by Dieter from Parowan, with a passenger in a L-13. They make adequate thermal soarers, too, about like a Blanik in cross-country performance. And a good pilot will make a longer cross-country in one of them than in a Blanik, because he isn't worried about a retrieve. -- ----- change 'netto' to 'net' to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vans RV-Light Sport Aircraft | Dale | Home Built | 6 | October 12th 04 12:28 AM |
Vans RV-G glider | Mark James Boyd | Soaring | 16 | November 6th 03 10:03 PM |
Van's C of G program | Ray Toews | Home Built | 5 | September 30th 03 01:20 PM |
bulding a kitplane maybe Van's RV9A --- a good idea ????? | Flightdeck | Home Built | 10 | September 9th 03 07:20 PM |
Vans RV4 or RV6 wanted | Joe | Home Built | 0 | August 17th 03 01:02 PM |