A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Perlan GLIDER ALTITUDE: 52004 ft



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old September 4th 17, 10:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tim Newport-Peace[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default Perlan GLIDER ALTITUDE: 52004 ft

At 01:26 04 September 2017, Tom Kelley #711 wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 6:56:13 PM UTC-6, G Shib wrote:
Well, 52,172 ft doesn't sound enough to claim a new world record.

According to sporting code,

3.0.4 World record margins
A new record claim must exceed the current value by 1 kilometre for

distance, 1 km/h for speed, and 3% for altitude.

The current altitude record is 50,720 ft. Adding 3% to it, you need at

least 52,241.6 ft to claim a new altitude record.

On their Virtual Cockpit page, I did see altitude over 53,800 ft. I

hope
they can claim a new world record!

I also saw 53,900. downloaded the IGC file and See You shows max.

altitude
of 54,022 ft at 14:31.24 with a landing at 15:44.28. Am wondering what
software will be used to analyze the claim? Is it GPS or pressure

altitude?

Anyway, Congrats to all!

Best. Tom #711.

Above 15,000 metres, GPS altitude data from an FR approved for high
altitude use (HAFR) shall be used, and AFAIK Perlan have the only HAFRs
that have been made.


  #12  
Old September 4th 17, 02:09 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 394
Default Perlan GLIDER ALTITUDE: 52004 ft

Congratulations Jim and Morgan! It's been a long hard road, but you hung in there and pulled it off!
Way to go,
JJ
  #13  
Old September 5th 17, 01:55 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 266
Default Perlan GLIDER ALTITUDE: 52004 ft

What a contrast in equipment from the Bishop wave project to now.
What Jim and Morgan have done is absolutely fantastic and the prospects for the future are amazing.
But think about the original Bishop pilots and the planes they flew...no pressure suits...very primative oxygen systems...no heating systems...they were like naked men in the jungle compared to Jim and Morgan.
  #14  
Old September 5th 17, 05:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bruce Hoult
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 961
Default Perlan GLIDER ALTITUDE: 52004 ft

On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 8:23:47 PM UTC+3, Tom Kelley #711 wrote:
GLIDER ALTITUDE: 52004 ft


Through the wonders of technology, I was watching their instruments live and commenting on twitter from a train between Tallinn, Estonia and St Petersburg, Russia.

They were in 300 - 500 FPM lift most of the time above 48000 ft and I think could have easily gone a lot higher. I'm sure they'll smash this new record pretty soon.
  #15  
Old September 5th 17, 11:11 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Martin Gregorie[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,224
Default Perlan GLIDER ALTITUDE: 52004 ft

On Mon, 04 Sep 2017 17:55:01 -0700, drguyacheson wrote:

What a contrast in equipment from the Bishop wave project to now.
What Jim and Morgan have done is absolutely fantastic and the prospects
for the future are amazing.
But think about the original Bishop pilots and the planes they flew...no
pressure suits...very primative oxygen systems...no heating
systems...they were like naked men in the jungle compared to Jim and
Morgan.


I only saw the 'we're flying' message when they were at 30,000 on the way
down. One thing was obvious, though: they looked to have plenty of air
and oxygen onboard - enough for around 10 hours if that was a 5 hour
flight - but the batteries were a lot more depleted: 30% or thereabouts,
so I wonder what they can do to upgrade their capacity so the battery can
give a similar runtime to the air supply. Are they currently using Li-
ion, LiFePo or just SLA?


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |
  #16  
Old September 5th 17, 03:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
ND
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 314
Default Perlan GLIDER ALTITUDE: 52004 ft

On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 1:47:11 PM UTC-4, Bill (BT) wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 1:28:15 PM UTC-4, Tom Kelley #711 wrote:
On Sunday, September 3, 2017 at 11:23:47 AM UTC-6, Tom Kelley #711 wrote:
GLIDER ALTITUDE: 52004 ft


GLIDER ALTITUDE: 53040 ft VERTICAL SPEED: 3 kts


Congratulations to the Perlan Team and to Greg Cole, the designer of the Perlan II!!

BT


an awesome achievement, but only the beginning. they still have to go 38,000 feet higher
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Perlan flying GLIDER ALTITUDE: 51134 ft Tom Kelley #711 Soaring 2 September 3rd 17 06:21 PM
Vector altitude for ILS below GS intercept altitude? M Instrument Flight Rules 23 May 20th 06 07:41 PM
Glider Altitude (Record?) over Mt. Everest [email protected] Soaring 2 January 19th 06 02:26 PM
Real Holder of the Glider Altitude Record, NOT RUTAN ON 21 JUNE Janus2k Soaring 12 June 14th 04 04:06 AM
Best Glider for Altitude Record Attempt? Jerome Conners Soaring 24 December 17th 03 10:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.