A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » Aviation Images » Aviation Photos
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Everything Went Wrong On The A-10 Warthog’s First Mission In The War On Terror



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 7th 17, 04:11 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.aviation
Miloch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,291
Default Everything Went Wrong On The A-10 Warthog’s First Mission In The War On Terror

more at
http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/eve...ssi-1795559531

The A-10 force has seen significant downsizing since the first Warthogs went
into combat a few months after 9/11, but the force has matured and been
significantly upgraded during that time, making the A-10 one of the most
connected and capable aircraft in the Air Force’s inventory. It’s not fast and
it’s not pretty, but the A-10 can loiter over the battlefield longer than other
attack aircraft once it gets there. And with 11 weapons hardpoints to carry
JDAMs, Maverick missiles, laser guided rockets and an advanced targeting system,
it packs quite a punch.

And then there’s the gun. The 30mm GAU-8 that is the entire reason for the jet’s
existence and its primary mission of close air support.

Today the Warthog fleet numbers 283 airframes spread across active duty, Guard
and Reserve units in Kuwait, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Turkey. It’s a vital tool in
the combat operations of the War on Terror, but its first outing there was an
incredibly precarious one.

During extensive interviews I conducted with numerous individuals familiar with
the A-10's participation in Anaconda, a clearer picture of the Warthog’s
involvement can be seen and how the lack of initially incorporating the A-10
into the original battle plan came off as extremely short-sighted.

Operation Anaconda

For five days in early March 2002, five A-10s attacked Al Qaeda and Taliban
targets from a Pakistani air base at Jacobabad in central Pakistan and home to a
portion of Pakistan’s F-16 fighters.

This was the first time the Warthog had been used in combat to fight terrorism,
taking place during the highly flawed Operation Anaconda. The op was designed to
trap a large force of Al Qaeda and Taliban fighters riding out the winter in a
series of small villages in the Shah-i-Kot Valley, but all of it was poorly
conceived.

Almost immediately, the ground forces became more heavily engaged than expected.
Obviously the enemy fighters in the targeted valley were not just hunkered down
for a long winter of rest as expected. Air support for the operation was limited
and planning conducted by Combined Joint Task Force Mountain was closely held,
so much so that the Air Force group that was to provide aircraft only received
the plans four days prior to the kickoff of Anaconda on March 2.

Expecting a relatively easy mission, commanders scaled back the need for
airpower based on recent experience.

The aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson, which was steaming in the Northern Arabian
Sea and was also poised to support Anaconda, was asking everyone and anyone for
more information on the operation—especially exactly where Anaconda was going to
take place.

As the operation began, A-10As of the 74th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron were
flying missions from Ahmed Al Jaber Airbase in Kuwait to support Operation
Southern Watch over Iraq and providing combat search and rescue support in the
event coalition aircraft went down and had to be rescued.

At Ahmed Al Jaber, U.S. Air Force F-15E Strike Eagles and F-16C Vipers also
shared the ramp and were making the three-hour drive to Afghanistan, loiter over
the battlefield and then fly three hours back. To make the same trip would have
taken the Warthogs more than five hours each way.

more at
http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/eve...ssi-1795559531





*

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apollo 13 pix, batch two - "Apollo 13 Mission Control during final 24 hours of the mission 700416 ap13-S70-35368HR.jpg" yEnc (4/4) [1354K] hielan' laddie Aviation Photos 0 September 10th 08 01:34 PM
Apollo 13 pix, batch two - "Apollo 13 Mission Control during final 24 hours of the mission 700416 ap13-S70-35368HR.jpg" yEnc (3/4) [1354K] hielan' laddie Aviation Photos 0 September 10th 08 01:34 PM
Apollo 13 pix, batch two - "Apollo 13 Mission Control during final 24 hours of the mission 700416 ap13-S70-35368HR.jpg" yEnc (2/4) [1354K] hielan' laddie Aviation Photos 0 September 10th 08 01:34 PM
Apollo 13 pix, batch two - "Apollo 13 Mission Control during final 24 hours of the mission 700416 ap13-S70-35368HR.jpg" yEnc (1/4) [1354K] hielan' laddie Aviation Photos 0 September 10th 08 01:33 PM
Flight 93? Or an A-10 Warthog? Hobo Naval Aviation 0 August 30th 07 12:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.