A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rust inhibitor?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 27th 03, 05:53 PM
Steve Thomas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rust inhibitor?

When you guys weld up your 4130 airframes do you use any type of rust
inhibitor in the tubes? I have read about some that you spray in the tubes
ait crawls up the walls to coat the whole inside, and it is supppose to leak
out of any weldment that had a pinhole in it. I am just curious if you use
anything like this or not. Thanks!

--
Have a good one!

Steve
www.americanspiritppc.com


  #2  
Old August 27th 03, 07:46 PM
Jerry Wass
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

YUP, Best thing is Boiled linseed oil--(can't hardly find raw anymore)
Weld a 1/2 collar of 1/8" pipe ftg to lower front cross pc. Weld same to
rudder post near top. put a couple of little valves on each ftg. Borry a refrig
vacuum pump, attach to top ftg. attach couple ft of plastic hose to lower valve.

place in bottom of gallon container, pour in couple qts of linseed oil, CLOSE
BOTTOM VALVE, pull vacuum on fuselage---if you can't pull a good vacuum,
you gotta leak---pressure it up & get a young kid ( that ain't been listenin to
loud music) & have him listen for leaks---WELD UP LEAKS---tRY AGAIN,
YOU PROBABLY MISSED ONE!
Then pull vacuum, shut vacuum valve( don't want erl in vac pump), open lower
valve, suck in 2 or 3 qts of oil. shut both valves. leave oil in a day or so,
rotating fuselage 4 times. If you got a little argon, attach to top ftg, open
bottom ftg, &
blow out excess oil. The argon keeps oxygen out while oil is draining, the oil
combines with any remaining oxygen, and turns to paint if it sees any oxygen,
thereby sealing any teensy weensy holes. DONT WELD ON FRAME ANY
MORE!!

Steve Thomas wrote:

When you guys weld up your 4130 airframes do you use any type of rust
inhibitor in the tubes? I have read about some that you spray in the tubes
ait crawls up the walls to coat the whole inside, and it is supppose to leak
out of any weldment that had a pinhole in it. I am just curious if you use
anything like this or not. Thanks!

--
Have a good one!

Steve
www.americanspiritppc.com


  #3  
Old August 28th 03, 12:50 AM
Jerry Wass
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Steve Thomas wrote:

Jerry,

Thanks for the info. I am building a 4130 PPC frame so th tubing is not open
between the connections. Do you guys drill holes where the tubes are to be
welded so that the air and oil can pass throughout the entire frame?
DEFINITELY


YES.--1/8 TO 3/16" HOLES



--
Have a good one!

Steve
www.americanspiritppc.com
"Jerry Wass" wrote in message
...
YUP, Best thing is Boiled linseed oil--(can't hardly find raw anymore)
Weld a 1/2 collar of 1/8" pipe ftg to lower front cross pc. Weld same to
rudder post near top. put a couple of little valves on each ftg. Borry a

refrig
vacuum pump, attach to top ftg. attach couple ft of plastic hose to lower

valve.

place in bottom of gallon container, pour in couple qts of linseed oil,

CLOSE
BOTTOM VALVE, pull vacuum on fuselage---if you can't pull a good vacuum,
you gotta leak---pressure it up & get a young kid ( that ain't been

listenin to
loud music) & have him listen for leaks---WELD UP LEAKS---tRY AGAIN,
YOU PROBABLY MISSED ONE!
Then pull vacuum, shut vacuum valve( don't want erl in vac pump), open

lower
valve, suck in 2 or 3 qts of oil. shut both valves. leave oil in a day or

so,
rotating fuselage 4 times. If you got a little argon, attach to top ftg,

open
bottom ftg, &
blow out excess oil. The argon keeps oxygen out while oil is draining,

the oil
combines with any remaining oxygen, and turns to paint if it sees any

oxygen,
thereby sealing any teensy weensy holes. DONT WELD ON FRAME ANY
MORE!!

Steve Thomas wrote:

When you guys weld up your 4130 airframes do you use any type of rust
inhibitor in the tubes? I have read about some that you spray in the

tubes
ait crawls up the walls to coat the whole inside, and it is supppose to

leak
out of any weldment that had a pinhole in it. I am just curious if you

use
anything like this or not. Thanks!

--
Have a good one!

Steve
www.americanspiritppc.com



  #4  
Old August 28th 03, 07:13 AM
Richard Lamb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Ernest Christley wrote:

Jerry Wass wrote:

Steve Thomas wrote:


Jerry,

Thanks for the info. I am building a 4130 PPC frame so th tubing is not open
between the connections. Do you guys drill holes where the tubes are to be
welded so that the air and oil can pass throughout the entire frame?
DEFINITELY



YES.--1/8 TO 3/16" HOLES


Use your torch to blow a hole. Quick, easy, and no deburring necessary.


And doing so prevents blowing holes at the end of the weld.
  #5  
Old August 28th 03, 03:38 PM
Corky Scott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 27 Aug 2003 16:53:15 GMT, "Steve Thomas"
wrote:

When you guys weld up your 4130 airframes do you use any type of rust
inhibitor in the tubes? I have read about some that you spray in the tubes
ait crawls up the walls to coat the whole inside, and it is supppose to leak
out of any weldment that had a pinhole in it. I am just curious if you use
anything like this or not. Thanks!

--
Have a good one!

Steve
www.americanspiritppc.com


Once again, I'm breaking from tradition regarding this building
method. What method do I use? Absolutely nothing.

Here's the way I figure it. I'm 55 now. I've welded this fuselage
together to the best of my ability and have closed off all openings.
Is it air tight? Proably not, there my be a pinhole somewhere. But
the fuselage will be sandblasted, at which time I get to inspect it
one more time, than it will be coated with primer and then coated with
paint. By the time all this is done, there will be precious few
places for water to get into, and that's without the fabric covering.

With the fabric covering, almost no water will be able to reach the
tubes. And even if it could, there would be very very few places for
it to get inside the tube. Did I mention that the fuselage sits level
rather than tail down? Well that's a factor too.

Finally, even if I somehow left a gaping hole for moisture to enter
the tubing, which isn't the case but for argument's sake let's assume
so, it still won't matter much in my lifetime.

So I decided not to painstakingly drill a hole through every joint so
that linseed oil or whatever could be poured into it and then roll the
fuselage around to slosh each tube, then drain it out, sort of. I
mean sheesh, what a mess to deal with and how much added weight would
this be? All for no good reason that I could see. The entire
fuselage doesn't rust out from the inside, never has. Only a few
tubes that were improperly welded and were tail down ever rusted much
and then it took 30 or 40 years to do so.

Corky Scott

  #6  
Old August 29th 03, 01:07 AM
Ernest Christley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Corky Scott wrote:

Once again, I'm breaking from tradition regarding this building
method. What method do I use? Absolutely nothing.

Here's the way I figure it. I'm 55 now. I've welded this fuselage
together to the best of my ability and have closed off all openings.
Is it air tight? Proably not, there my be a pinhole somewhere. But
the fuselage will be sandblasted, at which time I get to inspect it
one more time, than it will be coated with primer and then coated with
paint. By the time all this is done, there will be precious few
places for water to get into, and that's without the fabric covering.

With the fabric covering, almost no water will be able to reach the
tubes. And even if it could, there would be very very few places for
it to get inside the tube. Did I mention that the fuselage sits level
rather than tail down? Well that's a factor too.

Finally, even if I somehow left a gaping hole for moisture to enter
the tubing, which isn't the case but for argument's sake let's assume
so, it still won't matter much in my lifetime.

So I decided not to painstakingly drill a hole through every joint so
that linseed oil or whatever could be poured into it and then roll the
fuselage around to slosh each tube, then drain it out, sort of. I
mean sheesh, what a mess to deal with and how much added weight would
this be? All for no good reason that I could see. The entire
fuselage doesn't rust out from the inside, never has. Only a few
tubes that were improperly welded and were tail down ever rusted much
and then it took 30 or 40 years to do so.

Corky Scott


Corky, you're better off drilling a 1/8" hole in a low spot than to
leave just one small pinhole.

Used to drive a 18wheeler. Air brakes with big air tanks that had to be
bled, ie a short piece of rope is tied to a valve on the bottom of the
tank. If not bled regularly (every day), when you pull the rope all
sorts of dark brown gunk get blown out the bottom.

There was a spare tank sitting over in the yard that no one had used
for a year or two. I went over one day and pulled the rope on it.
Wasn't much pressure in it, but it squirted a slow steady stream of
water for a minute or so before petering out.

Here's the process. Airframe (which is acting as a tank here) get hot
during the day. The air pressure rises and forces humidity out of the
small amout of air in the tubes before the air gets squeezed out the
pinhole. Leaves maybe 0.1oz of water.

Night comes and the airframe cools. Very slowly, air, wet with evening
dew is drawn into the tube (with it's 0.1oz of water), where it waits to
start the cycle again the next day.

Paint won't help. If there's a pinhole, the paint will get blown off
when the pressure rises (the linseed oil runs into the hole from the
other side and acts as a plug, not a patch).

My unrequested advice: Either close it, and close it properly, or leave
it all the way open.

--
----Because I can----
http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/
------------------------

  #7  
Old August 29th 03, 03:33 AM
clare @ snyder.on .ca
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:07:15 GMT, Ernest Christley
wrote:

Corky Scott wrote:

Once again, I'm breaking from tradition regarding this building
method. What method do I use? Absolutely nothing.

Here's the way I figure it. I'm 55 now. I've welded this fuselage
together to the best of my ability and have closed off all openings.
Is it air tight? Proably not, there my be a pinhole somewhere. But
the fuselage will be sandblasted, at which time I get to inspect it
one more time, than it will be coated with primer and then coated with
paint. By the time all this is done, there will be precious few
places for water to get into, and that's without the fabric covering.


Corky,
It's not the water you see that hurts, it's the water in the air rhat
gets sucked in and out of those tubes as they heat and cool. As the
tubes cool they suck damp air in, and the moisture condenses out into
the tubes.
If you don't drain them at the low point the water builds up and it
WILL rust the tubes. Better to leave both ends wide open, and allow
the structure to breath, than to leave a few pinholes and not protect
the tubing.

With the fabric covering, almost no water will be able to reach the
tubes. And even if it could, there would be very very few places for
it to get inside the tube. Did I mention that the fuselage sits level
rather than tail down? Well that's a factor too.

Finally, even if I somehow left a gaping hole for moisture to enter
the tubing, which isn't the case but for argument's sake let's assume
so, it still won't matter much in my lifetime.

So I decided not to painstakingly drill a hole through every joint so
that linseed oil or whatever could be poured into it and then roll the
fuselage around to slosh each tube, then drain it out, sort of. I
mean sheesh, what a mess to deal with and how much added weight would
this be? All for no good reason that I could see. The entire
fuselage doesn't rust out from the inside, never has. Only a few
tubes that were improperly welded and were tail down ever rusted much
and then it took 30 or 40 years to do so.

Corky Scott


Corky, you're better off drilling a 1/8" hole in a low spot than to
leave just one small pinhole.

Used to drive a 18wheeler. Air brakes with big air tanks that had to be
bled, ie a short piece of rope is tied to a valve on the bottom of the
tank. If not bled regularly (every day), when you pull the rope all
sorts of dark brown gunk get blown out the bottom.

There was a spare tank sitting over in the yard that no one had used
for a year or two. I went over one day and pulled the rope on it.
Wasn't much pressure in it, but it squirted a slow steady stream of
water for a minute or so before petering out.

Here's the process. Airframe (which is acting as a tank here) get hot
during the day. The air pressure rises and forces humidity out of the
small amout of air in the tubes before the air gets squeezed out the
pinhole. Leaves maybe 0.1oz of water.

Night comes and the airframe cools. Very slowly, air, wet with evening
dew is drawn into the tube (with it's 0.1oz of water), where it waits to
start the cycle again the next day.

Paint won't help. If there's a pinhole, the paint will get blown off
when the pressure rises (the linseed oil runs into the hole from the
other side and acts as a plug, not a patch).

My unrequested advice: Either close it, and close it properly, or leave
it all the way open.


  #8  
Old August 29th 03, 04:37 AM
Jerry Wass
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


One more comment , if you please---If you seal it up, haveplugs in each end,
and pressure test it before you fly it----If you prang it kinda hard one day
&
wonder if you cracked a weld--simply pressure it up-(nitrogen, argon,etc)
then see if it bleeds down----If it does, pressure it up with Freon, and go
sniffin with a leak detector. Saw back a few years ago where a guy left it
pressured up, and put a small gage in the ftg. ---one more thing to
pre-flight.
clare, @, snyder.on, .ca wrote:

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:07:15 GMT, Ernest Christley
wrote:

Corky Scott wrote:

Once again, I'm breaking from tradition regarding this building
method. What method do I use? Absolutely nothing.

Here's the way I figure it. I'm 55 now. I've welded this fuselage
together to the best of my ability and have closed off all openings.
Is it air tight? Proably not, there my be a pinhole somewhere. But
the fuselage will be sandblasted, at which time I get to inspect it
one more time, than it will be coated with primer and then coated with
paint. By the time all this is done, there will be precious few
places for water to get into, and that's without the fabric covering.


Corky,
It's not the water you see that hurts, it's the water in the air rhat
gets sucked in and out of those tubes as they heat and cool. As the
tubes cool they suck damp air in, and the moisture condenses out into
the tubes.
If you don't drain them at the low point the water builds up and it
WILL rust the tubes. Better to leave both ends wide open, and allow
the structure to breath, than to leave a few pinholes and not protect
the tubing.

With the fabric covering, almost no water will be able to reach the
tubes. And even if it could, there would be very very few places for
it to get inside the tube. Did I mention that the fuselage sits level
rather than tail down? Well that's a factor too.

Finally, even if I somehow left a gaping hole for moisture to enter
the tubing, which isn't the case but for argument's sake let's assume
so, it still won't matter much in my lifetime.

So I decided not to painstakingly drill a hole through every joint so
that linseed oil or whatever could be poured into it and then roll the
fuselage around to slosh each tube, then drain it out, sort of. I
mean sheesh, what a mess to deal with and how much added weight would
this be? All for no good reason that I could see. The entire
fuselage doesn't rust out from the inside, never has. Only a few
tubes that were improperly welded and were tail down ever rusted much
and then it took 30 or 40 years to do so.

Corky Scott


Corky, you're better off drilling a 1/8" hole in a low spot than to
leave just one small pinhole.

Used to drive a 18wheeler. Air brakes with big air tanks that had to be
bled, ie a short piece of rope is tied to a valve on the bottom of the
tank. If not bled regularly (every day), when you pull the rope all
sorts of dark brown gunk get blown out the bottom.

There was a spare tank sitting over in the yard that no one had used
for a year or two. I went over one day and pulled the rope on it.
Wasn't much pressure in it, but it squirted a slow steady stream of
water for a minute or so before petering out.

Here's the process. Airframe (which is acting as a tank here) get hot
during the day. The air pressure rises and forces humidity out of the
small amout of air in the tubes before the air gets squeezed out the
pinhole. Leaves maybe 0.1oz of water.

Night comes and the airframe cools. Very slowly, air, wet with evening
dew is drawn into the tube (with it's 0.1oz of water), where it waits to
start the cycle again the next day.

Paint won't help. If there's a pinhole, the paint will get blown off
when the pressure rises (the linseed oil runs into the hole from the
other side and acts as a plug, not a patch).

My unrequested advice: Either close it, and close it properly, or leave
it all the way open.


  #9  
Old August 29th 03, 02:20 PM
Corky Scott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 02:33:04 GMT, clare @ snyder.on .ca wrote:


Corky,
It's not the water you see that hurts, it's the water in the air rhat
gets sucked in and out of those tubes as they heat and cool. As the
tubes cool they suck damp air in, and the moisture condenses out into
the tubes.
If you don't drain them at the low point the water builds up and it
WILL rust the tubes. Better to leave both ends wide open, and allow
the structure to breath, than to leave a few pinholes and not protect
the tubing.


Well that's good information, thanks Clare. Don't think it will
change my mind at this point but it's nice to know how the process
works.

The Christavia has so many tubes and they are of such thickness that
I'm reasonably sure the airframe will outlive me and my son, as long
as I don't create new openings by gronking it against a mountain or
something.

I compared the fuselage to a Wag-Aero 2+2 and was shocked to see how
beefy the Christavia was by comparison. The problem is that the
beefiness comes at the cost of additional weight I wish I did not have
to deal with.

Corky Scott
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sealing cork float against gasoline - how to... jt Home Built 13 July 18th 03 10:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.