A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Engine configuration



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old December 20th 07, 10:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,130
Default Engine configuration

On Dec 20, 6:49 am, GTH wrote:
a écrit :

Opposed engines have less drag than a radial


Agreed

or vee

Why would it be so ?
An opposed engine is much larger just behind the prop, when a Vee is
more easily streamlined.
Would you care to elaborate ?

Best regards,
--
Gilleshttp://contrails.free.fr


A vee takes up as much flat-plate area as an opposed, because
it's not likely to be cowled so the slipstream can flow through the
vee between the cylinder banks. The opposed and vee both have
crankcases and cylinder banks that are in the way, and the case of the
vee tends to be larger, forming a three-armed affair rather than the
two of the opposed. Some opposed engines have been very tightly cowled
for racing purposes, with the carb and such behind the engine instead
of under it.
Most vee-engines have some sort of reduction so that higher
hp can be obtained from a smaller configuration. These can be smaller
than opposed engines for the same hp, but they'll be heavier, too. A
direct-drive vee is pretty big. The Argus was one.
The inline engine is much more easily streamlined, but its
crank is longer and so has to be larger in diameter to obtain the
stiffness required, and as it gets larger it gets heavier.

Dan
  #42  
Old December 20th 07, 10:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Peter Dohm
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,754
Default Engine configuration


"cavelamb himself" wrote in message
...
John Halpenny wrote:
On Dec 20, 12:03 am, cavelamb himself wrote:
snip

But that all assumes you are going to use it direct drive - which almost
nobody does. If you use a gearbox, belt PSRU, or HiVo chain PSRU, they
will
all give you an offset of several inches, making for the same center of
gravity without the other changes, and allowing for much greater power,
because engine RPM's can be run much higher for the same prop RPM.

And what does all that do to 1) weight and 2) CG ???



1) A PSRU gives a smaller faster engine, which is usually lighter even
with the weight of the reduction gear.
2) Raising the output shaft several inches is the same as lowering the
CG, and the bulk of the engine that spoils your view, the same amount.

John halpenny



Not necessarily.

Starting with a V8 (or any other given engine) doesnt make the engine
smaller...


This only works for an engine "designer"...


Very true, and perfectly describes the difficulty of this sort of
discussion.

Peter



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
R172K Approach Configuration facpi Instrument Flight Rules 10 January 5th 07 03:58 PM
V-22 Prop Configuration, 3-vs-4 blades Don McIntyre Naval Aviation 23 April 10th 06 03:23 AM
T-2C Buckeye nav light configuration. Mike W. Naval Aviation 14 March 17th 05 07:05 AM
Question about center-line push-pull engine configuration Shin Gou Home Built 4 June 7th 04 05:57 PM
Hyping the Intermeshing Configuration Dave Jackson Rotorcraft 0 October 31st 03 08:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.