If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
On 26 Dec, 20:26, Marc Ramsey wrote:
How can anyone be assured of a 1000+ production run in a shrinking market that has never seen 1000+ unit production of any design? Over 2,500 Blaniks, 1,400 Ka-6's (all variants) and 1,100 Ka-8's were built. I can't offhand think of (or find) any other 1,000+ runs, but there have been some pretty big productions. There were at least 800 Grunau Babies, 776 Pirats, 700 Schweizer 1-26's, 700 ASK13's, 620 Bocians and 600 Standard Libelles. The glider manufacturers are smart, but I think they are in a death spiral of building ever more sophisticated designs for a shrinking population that can afford them. And just to make matters worse, the long lifespans of plastic gliders mean that second-hand performance is comparatively cheap. Glider pilots generally - I think - prefer performance to newness, so a £15,000 mass-produced glider would be up against hordes of second hand Libelles, ASW-19's, Pegases, Astirs, Jantars and so on. That, I think, is what killed the PW-5. About the only country where it did well was New Zealand where - as I understand it - there was a large fleet of elderly Ka-6's and the like and little by way of more modern fibreglass trickling down through the market. Ian |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
On 26 Dec, 22:31, wrote:
Well, the PW-5 did not failed. It was designed to meet the requirements and concept promoted by the FAI. That concept called for glider with L/D in low 30-ties. But the FAI didn't specify the price, did they? If the PW-5 had cost £7,500 fully instrumented and with trailer they'd have sold lots here. But priced alongside second hand Pegases they didn't stand a chance. Ian |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future - need for change
On Dec 28, 10:06 pm, "Bill Daniels" bildan@comcast-dot-net wrote:
There may be improvements in aero tow and motorgliders will continue to be popular but winch launch has by far the greatest potential to impact the economics of gliding. I hope left-of-pond people don't emphasise the cost to the exclusion of other important points: - winch launches are *fun*, both to watch and to do. My 15yo liked her trial flight in an aerotow, but was hooked by her first winch launch - winches are great for training - lots of circuits in a short time - even training for launch failures is fun - when you're learning, the short time in the air isn't seen as a negative Of course aerotows have advantages as well Adopting winch launch is NOT easy. Almost everything we know about aero tow either doesn't apply or requires significant change. Even things we think we know about winch launch is likely to be wrong or even dangerous. Winch launch must be approached with knowledge and dicipline at both the individual and organizational level. Suggestions made here that US operations adopt the BGA winch launch manuals is something I strongly support. I would suggest equal emphasis on the German DAeC winch manuals which are available in English. The German manuals tend to be more engineering orientated and less traditional than the British. Keep in mind all these manuals assume the reader has a significant knowledge of winch launch. All very true, of course. Here usenet discussions can be very helpful. And also misleading at times. Witness the recent AoA thread. |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
[From the Wiktionary]
Geezer is a British slang term, in its simplest form meaning a man. Derived from the differently pronounced 'guiser', a name for an actor in a mime. [1] Possibly related to disguise. In this sense it refers to a kind of everyman. It may be used in a number of senses; to refer to a man whose name you do not know, similar to use of the word guy. It is also used to refer to a man who is overtly manly, masculine, or heterosexual, also someone noticeably capable, reliable, plainspeaking or down-to-earth. Although essentially a masculine quality it is not synonymous with macho however, and its usage may be thought of as very similar to that of the US English word dude. Example: Joe Cole referred to Prince William as a 'nice, relaxed geezer.' [2] In the British 1971 pop song by the Piglets, aka Jonathon King, 'Johnny Reggae' was described as being 'a real tasty geezer'. In the United States and Canada, geezer generally refers to an old man, or more liberally, any old person, usually eccentric. This may derive from redundant use of the word old in English as in: who's that old geezer? where the subject is not necessarily an elderly person. [3]. This is an example of etymological contamination. In Australia, the term geezer is often used to refer to someone from England, due to the belief that the English say geezer a lot; however, it is not as popular as the term pommy.[citation needed] Because the population is aging in America, the term is slowly being broadened to include older women as well and imply a kind of colorful eccentricity, as well. For example, The Geezer Brigade, an online humor organization for 'clever old people', is split between men and women whose average age is 70. [End of quote] The Germans have a term Geise which means an old man and it is a very respectful term. [edit] Other usesAt 21:54 28 December 2007, Frank Whiteley wrote: On Dec 28, 2:45 pm, Eric Greenwell wrote: Frank Whiteley wrote: You will get much less objection to establishing a new gliderport with a winch than a tow plane. Land can also be mixed use, and leased, rather than purchased. Local regulations can be problematic or not. If you are in a club, you will likely get more objection from your geezer members to setting up a winch only club than you will from neighbors. I'd like to ask a favor of everyone: let's find a more accurate and less prejudicial term than 'geezer' for people that don't want change or reflexively favor aerotow. It's gratuitous, and disparagement apparently based on age isn't going to win any of the friends we'll need to improve soaring. It may also blind people to the fact that a lot of us 'geezers' support smaller, simpler, lighter, and cheaper soaring. Maybe 'reflexive aerotow promoters', 'anti-change group', or 'short-sighted club officers'? Or even skip the label entirely. The above statement could have used 'some members' just as effectively as 'geezer', especially since the poster was just speculating. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change 'netto' to 'net' to email me directly * 'Transponders in Sailplanes'http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * 'A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation' atwww.motorglider.org Even though I am one, I apologize. Resistence to change comes at any age when someone's comfort level is challenged. Frank |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
Where is 'here?' Does =A37,500 mean Australian 'Thalers?'
Most of us think r.a.s. is at home. At 22:24 28 December 2007, Ian wrote: On 26 Dec, 22:31, wrote: Well, the PW-5 did not failed. It was designed to meet the requirements and concept promoted by the FAI. That concept called for glider with L/D in low 30-ties. But the FAI didn't specify the price, did they? If the PW-5 had cost =A37,500 fully instrumented and with trailer they'd have sold lots here. But priced alongside second hand Pegases they didn't stand a chance. Ian |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 20:45:32 GMT, Eric Greenwell
wrote: Frank Whiteley wrote: You will get much less objection to establishing a new gliderport with a winch than a tow plane. Land can also be mixed use, and leased, rather than purchased. Local regulations can be problematic or not. If you are in a club, you will likely get more objection from your geezer members to setting up a winch only club than you will from neighbors. I'd like to ask a favor of everyone: let's find a more accurate and less prejudicial term than "geezer" for people that don't want change or reflexively favor aerotow. It's gratuitous, and disparagement apparently based on age isn't going to win any of the friends we'll need to improve soaring. It may also blind people to the fact that a lot of us "geezers" support smaller, simpler, lighter, and cheaper soaring. Maybe "reflexive aerotow promoters", "anti-change group", or "short-sighted club officers"? Or even skip the label entirely. The above statement could have used "some members" just as effectively as "geezer", especially since the poster was just speculating. My definition of "geezer" is "pilot who has more hours on fire than I have on actual instruments." An honorable title. rj |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
My definition of "geezer" is "pilot who has more hours on fire than I
have on *actual instruments." An honorable title. YEAH BABY! I love it. We have a few "geezer" pilots at our club who have been there - done that - and are my role models. This is all about having fun, after all.. Kirk 66 |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
The moral of that story is make a ballastic recovery chut a standard option.
Mike Schumann "Brad" wrote in message ... Remember when the Sparrowhawk first came out. It had a price of under 25K. I am pretty sure that the cost of manufacturing the airframe has not doubled in price, but the price of the sailplane has. Sailplanes that go fast and are designed for racing have way more parts than a glider designed for lower speed and sports flying. Safety would not be compromised in this design, but at lower wing loadings, lighter GW and lower speeds the need for elaborate "crash- worthiness" structure could be reduced. Even then, I recall the ASW-24 won the OSTIV prize for cockpit safety, and yet one spun in from less than 400ft and the pilot was killed. My friend was killed in his Atlas in the same manner. I am sure if I did the same in my Apis the result would be the same.............the moral of the story.....DON'T CRASH. Brad -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
It's nice to hear that winch launching is possible
at an existing US airport/gliderport. Over here in Europe the vast majority of training flights at many clubs are by winch. Learning to fly gliders up to solo standard is probably the most expensive part of gliding, so for the circuit bashing stuff winch launches are ideal. Generally we also mix in some aerotowing for the exercises that need a bit of altitude, and so that students learn how to aerotow, which is a considerable skill in itself. There also seems to be a view in the States that soaring away from a winch launch is only possible if you have a site right next to, or on top of, a ridge, or if you can get 2500ft+ launches. In fact many winch launching sites in Europe are in flat areas. You just have to learn to soar away in thermals from fairly low altitudes. I fly from a flatland club in the south of England. Our winch runs vary from 3500 to 4500 feet, depending on the wind strength and direction, and we normally get launches in the range 1400 to 2000ft. On days when there are thermals, our better soaring pilots will probably get away 8 times out of 10. Even if they fall down, another winch launch is not going to break the bank. Airfields are usually placed on high, well drained land, so are often good thermal sources in themselves, especially if there are hard runways. The trick is to fly just downwind of the airfield looking for thermal markers, such as other gliders circling higher up, birds taking off and, in hotter climates, dust devils. In the absence of any of these markers just try to cover as much ground as you can before getting down to circuit height. Even in the circuit you still may still encounter lift, but only use it if it doesn't compromise the safety of the flight. Del Copeland At 19:42 28 December 2007, Sam Discusflyer wrote: Our club operates a winch from a public airport. The FOB manager is very supportive. It takes some planning. It requires you to discuss with your club and discuss directly with the FOB manager. Prepare a presentation (BTW nothing fancy), prepare a written agreement, discuss safety, operations, and the airports revenue sharing amount. This is a critical step as most FOB managers must report the activity to the city/county airport board. The BGA has emmense experience and offer a lot of documentation to assist you. USE IT. Back up what you tell the FOB. Bring in some experienced winch operators for your first weekend. It works. I was thinking about the bait switch today and how that works. I laughed when I thought about a reverse way to use it. One of our students had been training on aero tow. Paying about $30/tow. He was only doing 2-3 tows every couple of weeks. You could see he was on the edge of losing interest. Our winch operations came along at just the right time. We only charge $10/waunch. This student took 3 waunches the first day and 9 waunches the next. He was so hooked he then ran for a club officer position. He exclaimed '9 flights for the price of 3'. WOW. So have a new student pay for 3 aero tows for $90, then introduce them to 9 waunches for the same price. And guess what, they also get 3 times the practice. If you want a copy of our presentation and other materials, drop me a line. SAM At 16:42 28 December 2007, Bill Daniels wrote: 'toad' wrote in message . com... Sorry that I'm late to the discussion, but I think the issue about winches in the US is primarily about land. I doubt that there are very few public use airports in the US that would allow winch operations. There are only a few that put up with aero tow glider operations. So to start a winch operation in the US you would have to own enough land and be able to get it designated an airport (hard to do politically) to allow winch operation. In the northeastern US, there is only one glider clubs that I know of that has the space to do it, at Philadelphia. The land for such an operation would cost several million dollars at todays prices. Aero tow doesn't sound so expensive compared to paying for that mortgage. Todd Smith 3S Todd, I think you overstate the situation. I have asked three airport managers about winch launch and the response was 'bring it on'. It seems almost universal that glider pilots assume winch operations would be turned down so they don't actually ask. Ask in a reasonable way and you may be surprised at the answer. Managers of small airports that have traditionally served small, single engine airplanes have seen the number of operations at their airports drop dramatically as the price of 100LL avgas has soared. (Many predict 100LL will become non-existant within the next three years.) That drop in operations has them worried about their jobs which, to a degree, depends on public demand for airport services. Against this background, a proposal that would bring 100's of operations per day, even if they are gliders, can look pretty good, particularly if those operations don't generate noise complaints. Work up an reasonable winch operations plan with lots of information about other successful operations and present it. Can't hurt. Bill Daniels p.s. I you want help, e-mail me. |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
soaring into the future
The problem with winch launching in the US is the inherent fear of change in
the average person. Most pilots in the US have never experienced a winch launch, so they only look at the downsides. The potential launch cost savings aren't significant enough to interest the guys who already own private ships and have decent incomes. The same guys don't realize how much fun winching can be, as they've never tried it. In order to be a safe and successful with winch launching, you need to make a 100% commitment. You can't run winches and tows in parallel, if people are going to get and stay proficient in winch launching. In addition, the only way winches are economically justifiable is if you totally eliminate the overhead, operating, and maintenance costs associated with a tow plane. The other problem in the US, is that most glider operations take place at public airports. The coexistence of winches with power traffic can lead to real, as well as imaginary issues. With the cost of farmland going thru the roof, thanks to ethanol and urban sprawl, the feasibility of buying or leasing land for a winch only strip reasonably close to major metropolitan areas, where the pilots live, is quite problematic. To overcome this hurdle, it's going to take a very imaginative marketing effort, the most important element of which has to be touring the country giving winch demos to clubs, so people start looking at how much FUN winch launches are, instead of focusing on the cost savings. Mike Schumann P.S. I'm firmly convinced that the most promising market for winch launching is with commercial operators, who are heavily focused on selling rides. Not only would their margins increase dramatically, but so would the ride experience and the marketability of their product. "Dan G" wrote in message ... On Dec 27, 8:18 pm, Marc Ramsey wrote: big snip I wish it was as easy as you think... What's interesting to me is that you seem to be looking at the same prices we are. A PW6U is £45,000 over here; a factory built Skylaunch is ~£60,000. The former has seen a couple of sales and the latter are being snapped up all over the place. How can we can afford to buy kit like this and you guys can't? Most of the clubs I know have bought this equipment cash. A club which has bought a Skylaunch recently might have about 100 members paying £300 a year each and about £7 a winch launch, plus around £25 an hour glider hire. An aerotow, btw, costs about £25 to 2,000'. What are US club membership numbers and costs like? Dan -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Colorado Soaring Pilots/SSA Governor 2007 Seminar and 2006 Soaring Awards Banquet | Frank Whiteley | Soaring | 0 | February 15th 07 04:52 PM |
The Soaring Server is dead; long live the Soaring Servers | John Leibacher | Soaring | 3 | November 1st 04 10:57 PM |
Possible future legal problems with "SOARING" | Bob Thompson | Soaring | 3 | September 26th 04 11:48 AM |
Soaring Server/Worldwide Soaring Turnpoint Exchange back online | John Leibacher | Soaring | 0 | June 21st 04 05:25 PM |
Soaring Server - Worldwide Soaring Turnpoint Exchange | John Leibacher | Soaring | 0 | June 19th 04 04:57 PM |