A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

C-172 versus Sundowner - epilogue



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 23rd 06, 04:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default C-172 versus Sundowner - epilogue

Well, I went and kicked the tires on the Sundowner.

It is roomy and the two doors are a lot more convienient than the
single Piper door.

But, to make a long story short, the plane had extensive and recent
damage from a landing incident; prop strike, collapsed gear, one
wing, fuselage, and tail feathers.

Back to looking...

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #2  
Old July 23rd 06, 08:40 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 180
Default C-172 versus Sundowner - epilogue

A banged up Sundowner with nose strike damage, sounds like someone did not
know how to fly.

Where the repairs properly annotated and complete? should have not been a
problem then..

BT

wrote in message
...
Well, I went and kicked the tires on the Sundowner.

It is roomy and the two doors are a lot more convienient than the
single Piper door.

But, to make a long story short, the plane had extensive and recent
damage from a landing incident; prop strike, collapsed gear, one
wing, fuselage, and tail feathers.

Back to looking...

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.



  #3  
Old July 23rd 06, 09:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default C-172 versus Sundowner - epilogue

BTIZ wrote:
A banged up Sundowner with nose strike damage, sounds like someone did not
know how to fly.


Where the repairs properly annotated and complete? should have not been a
problem then..


BT


wrote in message
...
Well, I went and kicked the tires on the Sundowner.

It is roomy and the two doors are a lot more convienient than the
single Piper door.

But, to make a long story short, the plane had extensive and recent
damage from a landing incident; prop strike, collapsed gear, one
wing, fuselage, and tail feathers.

Back to looking...

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.


Yeah, all in the logs, just too much and too recent for me to be
comfortable.

I wouldn't buy an airplane with 5 SMOH either.

Too much chance the work was done on the cheap.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
  #4  
Old July 23rd 06, 09:36 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 180
Default C-172 versus Sundowner - epilogue

Yeah, all in the logs, just too much and too recent for me to be
comfortable.

I wouldn't buy an airplane with 5 SMOH either.

Too much chance the work was done on the cheap.



Understand, not without a very large discount or you knew the engine shops
reputation.
BT


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
C-172 versus Sundowner [email protected] Owning 30 July 23rd 06 03:34 PM
Air Force Aerial Refueling Methods: Flying Boom versus Hose-and-Drogue Mike Naval Aviation 26 July 11th 06 11:38 PM
"zero" versus "oscar" versus "sierra" Ron Garret Piloting 30 December 20th 04 08:49 AM
Beech Sundowner strobe power supply location???? Jack McAdams Owning 3 September 13th 03 09:18 PM
Beechcraft Sundowner VM Owning 4 August 9th 03 04:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.