If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Klewless newbie alert! (Was Troll alert! Why is "CovvTseTung" using multiple aliases here?)
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:14:35 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Maxwell's
Syphilitic Mother bloviated: In article , Aratzio says... On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:11:25 -0700, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks, Maxwell's Syphilitic Mother got double secret probation for writing: In article , Aratzio says... On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:31:07 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Chairman Cow bloviated: In article , Aratzio says... On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:31:37 +0000 (UTC), in alt.usenet.kooks, Bertie the Bunyip bloviated: Aratzio wrote in : On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:59:09 +0000 (UTC), in alt.usenet.kooks, Bertie the Bunyip bloviated: Aratzio wrote in : On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:33:53 +0000 (UTC), in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Bertie the Bunyip bloviated: Maxwell luv2^fly99@live.^com wrote in news:MPG.2312a375ad75180898b270 : In article , Bertie the Bunyip says... Maxwell luv2^fly99@live.^com wrote in : In article , ~Z~ says... Thomas Reynolds wrote: FWIW, Maxwell is covv tse tung Yup! Good eye, TR. Good eye. From: Maxwell luv2^fly99@live.^com Organization: Signal is Dead, Long Live Noise!!!1! Message-ID: ...notbxpats.edu From: CovvTseTung Organization: Signal is Dead, Long Live Noise!!!1! Message-ID: ...notbxpats.edu So, now "CovvTseTung / Maxwell" is using multiple fake names to hide his posts here. You really are st00pid. I don't change any of my headers, don't change my .sig, don't change my newsreader and don't change my NSP, and you think I'm trying to 'hide'! Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha If'n I want to 'hide', I guarantee you won't have a klew Would you like to explain that, "Maxwell," or is this community still "one heck of a long way from being entitled to a response?" Make that explanation count, because block sender is next. You might want to ask yourself that since I don't have any intent of trying to 'hide', just what it is I do intend. what's with the sudden interest in RI? I was born there, lo, many moons ago. And when I saw these nice people being given a new froup by teh B8MBis and struggle to get it propogated, I felt it was my duty as a native son to assist their efforts by increasing the poast count. Sadly, my motives appear to have been ... misinterpreted. And after I've worked my fingers to the bone... History will vindicate me! Moo-oo-oo-oo!!!1! Indeed. you might even put them on the map! Albeit in a small out of the way and dusty corner. With the old half empty cans of paint. With brushes left in to dry. Poor little Rhode Island. It twas the smallest in the land. The smallest state likes to brag about having the longest name. Tells you something about the residents, eh what? Oh yeah: New Hampshire Rhode Island The State of Rhode Island and the Providence Plantations The State of New Hampshire There, that's better (for real!) So they strung a bunch of useless verbiage on their name so people would think they can't walk from one end of the plantation to the other in a few minutes. IIRC, it was almost impossible to drive from my hometown in RI to anywhere else in the state without passing through part of Mass. At least twice. Same parts? |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Klewless newbie alert! (Was Troll alert! Why is "CovvTseTung" using multiple aliases here?)
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:15:25 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Maxwell's
Syphilitic Mother bloviated: In article , Aratzio says... On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:41:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, Jim Logajan bloviated: Aratzio wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:57:13 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks, Jim Logajan got double secret probation for writing: "Kadaitcha Man" wrote: Jim Logajan, ye hunch-backed that work for bread, away with thee thou giglet, ye chinned: I know Usenet is in decline but I'm a little unclear of the motivations for the cross postings. Is it a deliberate attempt to kill Usenet or is that just an incidental byproduct? Neither. The intent is to find out the whiny or clueless ****heads are. So it is an incidental byproduct. Only a clueless ****head would post a followup to an obviously rhetorical question. Looks like I've helped you identify one of those clueless ****heads. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAAA pats head Sure, it was cupcake. digging a hole where the rain gets in Missing the false-choice nature of the rhetorical question the first time through is a mistake I hoped some would fall for. But I was afraid it was too obvious and was expecting some clever repartee on that account. But for you to wad in and _still_ not see the obvious false-choice _after_ I clued readers in that it contained a rhetorical device really says a lot about the kind of lousy education you got. You'd have done yourself more favors by remaining silent. Didn't you at least take an introductory course in logic or philosophy in college where rhetorical fallacies are explained? You post hoc claim that you were asking rhetorical questions after you look like an idiot. You obviously read "Backpedal For Dummies" He wrote it. Starred in the Bollywood adaptation. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Klewless newbie alert! (Was Troll alert! Why is "CovvTseTung" using multiple aliases here?)
In article , Aratzio
says... On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:14:35 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Maxwell's Syphilitic Mother bloviated: In article , Aratzio says... On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:11:25 -0700, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks, Maxwell's Syphilitic Mother got double secret probation for writing: In article , Aratzio says... On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:31:07 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Chairman Cow bloviated: In article , Aratzio says... On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:31:37 +0000 (UTC), in alt.usenet.kooks, Bertie the Bunyip bloviated: Aratzio wrote in : On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:59:09 +0000 (UTC), in alt.usenet.kooks, Bertie the Bunyip bloviated: Aratzio wrote in : On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:33:53 +0000 (UTC), in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Bertie the Bunyip bloviated: Maxwell luv2^fly99@live.^com wrote in news:MPG.2312a375ad75180898b270 : In article , Bertie the Bunyip says... Maxwell luv2^fly99@live.^com wrote in : In article , ~Z~ says... Thomas Reynolds wrote: FWIW, Maxwell is covv tse tung Yup! Good eye, TR. Good eye. From: Maxwell luv2^fly99@live.^com Organization: Signal is Dead, Long Live Noise!!!1! Message-ID: ...notbxpats.edu From: CovvTseTung Organization: Signal is Dead, Long Live Noise!!!1! Message-ID: ...notbxpats.edu So, now "CovvTseTung / Maxwell" is using multiple fake names to hide his posts here. You really are st00pid. I don't change any of my headers, don't change my .sig, don't change my newsreader and don't change my NSP, and you think I'm trying to 'hide'! Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha If'n I want to 'hide', I guarantee you won't have a klew Would you like to explain that, "Maxwell," or is this community still "one heck of a long way from being entitled to a response?" Make that explanation count, because block sender is next. You might want to ask yourself that since I don't have any intent of trying to 'hide', just what it is I do intend. what's with the sudden interest in RI? I was born there, lo, many moons ago. And when I saw these nice people being given a new froup by teh B8MBis and struggle to get it propogated, I felt it was my duty as a native son to assist their efforts by increasing the poast count. Sadly, my motives appear to have been ... misinterpreted. And after I've worked my fingers to the bone... History will vindicate me! Moo-oo-oo-oo!!!1! Indeed. you might even put them on the map! Albeit in a small out of the way and dusty corner. With the old half empty cans of paint. With brushes left in to dry. Poor little Rhode Island. It twas the smallest in the land. The smallest state likes to brag about having the longest name. Tells you something about the residents, eh what? Oh yeah: New Hampshire Rhode Island The State of Rhode Island and the Providence Plantations The State of New Hampshire There, that's better (for real!) So they strung a bunch of useless verbiage on their name so people would think they can't walk from one end of the plantation to the other in a few minutes. IIRC, it was almost impossible to drive from my hometown in RI to anywhere else in the state without passing through part of Mass. At least twice. Same parts? Combination of weird border lines caused by lots of inlets, and an old highway that probably follows an older indian path that in turn followed a deer path. New England roads aren't the wide thoroughfares that most of the country take for granted. No nice pretty grid patterns. -- "Tis an ill wind that blows no minds" |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Klewless newbie alert! (Was Troll alert! Why is "CovvTseTung" using multiple aliases here?)
In article , Aratzio
says... On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:15:25 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Maxwell's Syphilitic Mother bloviated: In article , Aratzio says... On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:41:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, Jim Logajan bloviated: Aratzio wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:57:13 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks, Jim Logajan got double secret probation for writing: "Kadaitcha Man" wrote: Jim Logajan, ye hunch-backed that work for bread, away with thee thou giglet, ye chinned: I know Usenet is in decline but I'm a little unclear of the motivations for the cross postings. Is it a deliberate attempt to kill Usenet or is that just an incidental byproduct? Neither. The intent is to find out the whiny or clueless ****heads are. So it is an incidental byproduct. Only a clueless ****head would post a followup to an obviously rhetorical question. Looks like I've helped you identify one of those clueless ****heads. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAAA pats head Sure, it was cupcake. digging a hole where the rain gets in Missing the false-choice nature of the rhetorical question the first time through is a mistake I hoped some would fall for. But I was afraid it was too obvious and was expecting some clever repartee on that account. But for you to wad in and _still_ not see the obvious false-choice _after_ I clued readers in that it contained a rhetorical device really says a lot about the kind of lousy education you got. You'd have done yourself more favors by remaining silent. Didn't you at least take an introductory course in logic or philosophy in college where rhetorical fallacies are explained? You post hoc claim that you were asking rhetorical questions after you look like an idiot. You obviously read "Backpedal For Dummies" He wrote it. Starred in the Bollywood adaptation. I wonder how Chinese cinema is doing. Might be an interesting speculative investment... -- "Tis an ill wind that blows no minds" |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Klewless newbie alert! (Was Troll alert! Why is "CovvTseTung" using multiple aliases here?)
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:12:18 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Juan
Tootreego bloviated: In article , Aratzio says... On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:15:25 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Maxwell's Syphilitic Mother bloviated: In article , Aratzio says... On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:41:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, Jim Logajan bloviated: Aratzio wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:57:13 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks, Jim Logajan got double secret probation for writing: "Kadaitcha Man" wrote: Jim Logajan, ye hunch-backed that work for bread, away with thee thou giglet, ye chinned: I know Usenet is in decline but I'm a little unclear of the motivations for the cross postings. Is it a deliberate attempt to kill Usenet or is that just an incidental byproduct? Neither. The intent is to find out the whiny or clueless ****heads are. So it is an incidental byproduct. Only a clueless ****head would post a followup to an obviously rhetorical question. Looks like I've helped you identify one of those clueless ****heads. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAAA pats head Sure, it was cupcake. digging a hole where the rain gets in Missing the false-choice nature of the rhetorical question the first time through is a mistake I hoped some would fall for. But I was afraid it was too obvious and was expecting some clever repartee on that account. But for you to wad in and _still_ not see the obvious false-choice _after_ I clued readers in that it contained a rhetorical device really says a lot about the kind of lousy education you got. You'd have done yourself more favors by remaining silent. Didn't you at least take an introductory course in logic or philosophy in college where rhetorical fallacies are explained? You post hoc claim that you were asking rhetorical questions after you look like an idiot. You obviously read "Backpedal For Dummies" He wrote it. Starred in the Bollywood adaptation. I wonder how Chinese cinema is doing. Might be an interesting speculative investment... in 16 years, which is 13 in the west. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Klewless newbie alert! (Was Troll alert! Why is "CovvTseTung" using multiple aliases here?)
In article , Aratzio
says... On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 05:40:15 -0700, in alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, Maxwell's Syphilitic Mother bloviated: In article , Aratzio says... On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:43:46 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, Jim Logajan bloviated: Maxwell's Syphilitic Mother wrote: In article , Jim Logajan says... I know Usenet is in decline but I'm a little unclear of the motivations for the cross postings. Is it a deliberate attempt to kill Usenet or is that just an incidental byproduct? Why do you assume that everyone who x-poasts has the same motive? Sigh. It was a rhetorical question. It contained a false choice. Thanks for playing anyway. Don't call us, we'll call you. I realize you're stump-st00pid, but not even newbies make that mistake. This is such a disappointment. The witty repartee from the a.u.kers has already reached its peak. This happened the last time I tried to have some fun with them. I can see why you never had fun. Jimmie-boi has fun, but you don't want to ask 'Doing what?' Clubbing himself like a baby seal? There's other things to do with baby seals... "It was April the forty-first Being a quadruple leap year I was driving in downtown Atlantis My barracuda was in the shop So I was in a rented stingray And it was overheating So I pulled into a Shell Station They said I'd blown a seal I said, "Fix the damn thing And leave my private life out of it Okay pal?" ...."Wet Dreams", Kip Addotta -- "Tis an ill wind that blows no minds" |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Klewless newbie alert! (Was Troll alert! Why is "CovvTseTung" using multiple aliases here?)
In article , Aratzio
says... On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:12:18 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Juan Tootreego bloviated: In article , Aratzio says... On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 06:15:25 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Maxwell's Syphilitic Mother bloviated: In article , Aratzio says... On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:41:11 -0500, in alt.usenet.kooks, Jim Logajan bloviated: Aratzio wrote: On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 21:57:13 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks, Jim Logajan got double secret probation for writing: "Kadaitcha Man" wrote: Jim Logajan, ye hunch-backed that work for bread, away with thee thou giglet, ye chinned: I know Usenet is in decline but I'm a little unclear of the motivations for the cross postings. Is it a deliberate attempt to kill Usenet or is that just an incidental byproduct? Neither. The intent is to find out the whiny or clueless ****heads are. So it is an incidental byproduct. Only a clueless ****head would post a followup to an obviously rhetorical question. Looks like I've helped you identify one of those clueless ****heads. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAAA pats head Sure, it was cupcake. digging a hole where the rain gets in Missing the false-choice nature of the rhetorical question the first time through is a mistake I hoped some would fall for. But I was afraid it was too obvious and was expecting some clever repartee on that account. But for you to wad in and _still_ not see the obvious false-choice _after_ I clued readers in that it contained a rhetorical device really says a lot about the kind of lousy education you got. You'd have done yourself more favors by remaining silent. Didn't you at least take an introductory course in logic or philosophy in college where rhetorical fallacies are explained? You post hoc claim that you were asking rhetorical questions after you look like an idiot. You obviously read "Backpedal For Dummies" He wrote it. Starred in the Bollywood adaptation. I wonder how Chinese cinema is doing. Might be an interesting speculative investment... in 16 years, which is 13 in the west. That's because they use those funny lunar calendars -- "Tis an ill wind that blows no minds" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FOD alert ! | Don Pyeatt | Aviation Photos | 6 | May 24th 07 12:45 AM |
VCR alert for 3/31/04 | Eric Moore | Military Aviation | 1 | March 28th 04 08:39 AM |
PEZ Alert | John Shelton | Soaring | 0 | February 2nd 04 10:34 PM |
PEZ alert | John Shelton | Soaring | 21 | January 22nd 04 06:01 PM |
PEZ Alert | John Shelton | Soaring | 0 | January 20th 04 09:35 PM |