A few snaps at KLIA [1/9] - DSC_6672.jpg (1/1)

On 2015-03-12 21:50:22 +0000, Indrek said:

"Savageduck" wrote in message
news:2015031123103280979-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
On 2015-03-12 06:00:11 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
"Ri�ardo" wrote in message
...
On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:

Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take ca

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...ecurity-claims


Thanks

Ricardo.

Thankfully, Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example. Many
years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military aircraft
in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
injunction.

Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
closely at AMS.

Oops! Lets try that again.

I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
here is attempt #3.
If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
final try.
Sorry for the messy posts folks. :-(
...and here is that final try:



That's certainly an atmospheric picture. Was it HDR from multiple
exposures, or from a single exposure?

That was a 5 exposure HDR. I was waiting to board and just tried an
opportunistic capture in what was questionable light.
You can definitely get a bit more out of the HDR than this:






--
Regards,

Savageduck

On 2015-03-13 06:33:15 +0000, Savageduck said:

On 2015-03-12 21:50:22 +0000, Indrek said:
"Savageduck" wrote in message
news:2015031123103280979-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
On 2015-03-12 06:00:11 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
"Ri�ardo" wrote in message
...
On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:

Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take ca

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...ecurity-claims


Thanks

Ricardo.

Thankfully,

Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other countries
have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example. Many
years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military aircraft
in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what possible
significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
injunction.

Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
closely at AMS.

Oops! Lets try that again.

I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
here is attempt #3.
If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
final try.
Sorry for the messy posts folks. :-(
...and here is that final try:



That's certainly an atmospheric picture. Was it HDR from multiple
exposures, or from a single exposure?

That was a 5 exposure HDR. I was waiting to board and just tried an
opportunistic capture in what was questionable light.
You can definitely get a bit more out of the HDR than this:

image

Oh! No! Not again!
Here we go for try #2, again this is what I had to deal with in the bad light.




--
Regards,

Savageduck

"Savageduck" wrote in message
news:2015031223383774933-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
On 2015-03-13 06:33:15 +0000, Savageduck
said:

On 2015-03-12 21:50:22 +0000, Indrek said:
"Savageduck" wrote in message
news:2015031123103280979-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...
On 2015-03-12 06:00:11 +0000, Savageduck
said:
On 2015-03-12 05:54:31 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2015-03-12 05:48:34 +0000, Savageduck said:
On 2015-03-07 13:35:28 +0000, Indrek said:
"Ri�ardo" wrote in message
...
On 07/03/2015 00:49, Indrek wrote:

Thank you Indrek, good stuff yet again. However, do take ca

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...ecurity-claims


Thanks

Ricardo.

Thankfully,

Malaysia is a very tolerant country so I encountered no
problems while taking photos at the airport. Clearly, other
countries
have a different attitude. I seem to recall a British anorak
plane-spotter was arrested fairly recently in Greece, for example.
Many
years ago I was in Entebbe and saw a large notice at the airport
forbidding photography of military aircraft. The only military
aircraft
in sight were a couple of decrepit Dakotas. I did wonder what
possible
significance could be attached to them, but dutifully obeyed the
injunction.

Good thing they weren't watching me with my load of camera gear too
closely at AMS.

Oops! Lets try that again.

I hate to say this but something isn't working quite right here. So
here is attempt #3.
If it doesn't fly this time I will switch Usenet clients and give it a
final try.
Sorry for the messy posts folks. :-(
...and here is that final try:



That's certainly an atmospheric picture. Was it HDR from multiple
exposures, or from a single exposure?

That was a 5 exposure HDR. I was waiting to board and just tried an
opportunistic capture in what was questionable light.
You can definitely get a bit more out of the HDR than this:

image

Oh! No! Not again!
Here we go for try #2, again this is what I had to deal with in the bad
light.







--
Regards,

Savageduck

Thanks for that.

It looks pretty gloomy. You must have very steady hands (or a tripod) to
have used shutter speeds low enough to get the brighter exposures.

Cheers,

Indrek Aavisto


--
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and
hence clamorous to be led to safety), by menacing it with an endless series
of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.�

– H.L. Mencken



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

On 2015-03-14 15:16:28 +0000, Indrek said:

"Savageduck" wrote in message
news:2015031223383774933-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom...

Oh! No! Not again!
Here we go for try #2, again this is what I had to deal with in the bad light.

Thanks for that.

It looks pretty gloomy. You must have very steady hands (or a tripod)
to have used shutter speeds low enough to get the brighter exposures.

With the D300S I get 5-7 frames/second depending on exposure time. I
have hone my technique for shooting handheld HDR exposure bracket sets.
Personally I prefer better light to shoot in.
With that set the brightest exposure was 1/30 sec @ f/6.3, the darkest,
1/500 sec @ f/6.3. The normal 0 EV exposure was 1/250 sec @ f/6.3.

--
Regards,

Savageduck