A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dan Rather forges ahead



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 11th 04, 10:45 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dan Rather forges ahead


From the New York Post this morning:

September 11, 2004 -- CBS anchor Dan Rather hung tough last night and
insisted there's no "definitive evidence" to refute the authenticity
of documents about President Bush's National Guard service — but a
growing number of document experts smell a hoax.
"If any definitive evidence to the contrary of our story is found, we
will report it. So far there is none," Rather insisted.

He produced a man named Marcel Matley as the document vetter.

But Matley is primarily a handwriting expert whose expertise in
document evaluation has been challenged by the head of the American
Board of Forensic Document Examiners.

Matley spoke only about a signature and initials purported to be those
of the late Lt. Col. Jerry Killian — "they are his signatures" —
though two of the four memos are unsigned.

Rather also acknowledged CBS has no originals, only photocopies.

Allan Haley — a typeface expert at Agfa Monotype — said anyone who
claims to definitively authenticate a photocopy "is either guessing or
is a fool."



In another challenge to CBS, Killian's boss, retired Maj. Gen. Bobby
W. Hodges, told ABC News that he regards the documents as a computer
"fraud," never saw them in the 1970s and didn't validate them for CBS.

A senior CBS official had claimed to the Washington Post that Hodges
had validated the documents.

During his national news broadcast, Rather claimed "partisan political
operatives" are challenging the memos but omitted the fact that
Killian's widow and son dispute them.

The memos cast doubt on whether Bush fulfilled his Guard requirements.

Marjorie Connell — widow of Lt. Col. Killian, who died in 1984 — has
told ABC the documents are "very suspect" because her late husband
didn't type and was a big fan of the young Bush.

A key issue is whether the documents were made on a 1970s-era
typewriter or are forgeries done by computer because of their
proportional spacing and raised superscripts on ordinal numbers like
"111th."

Rather last night pointed to an undisputed document from Bush's
National Guard files and claimed it has a superscript, so they were
available by 1968.

But that document is in a different typeface and experts say it was
made on a different type of machine without proportional spacing so it
proves nothing.

"It could be a superscript, it could be a correction with a letter
showing through white-out, but in any case it's absolutely irrelevant
.. . . It doesn't prove a thing," said document expert Bill Flynn.

"It's a completely different technology," added the Phoenix-based
Flynn.

Flynn said it's "very unlikely" that the memos are legit, adding that
he knows of no typewriter fonts using proportionally spaced Roman type
with a raised "th" available in the 1970s.


all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
Expedition sailboat charters www.expeditionsail.com
  #2  
Old September 11th 04, 11:30 PM
Tom Cervo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Flynn said it's "very unlikely" that the memos are legit, adding that
he knows of no typewriter fonts using proportionally spaced Roman type
with a raised "th" available in the 1970s.


Come off it, Dan, anyone who used a typewriter knew the trick of lifting the
roller a smidge (or lowering it) for sub (or super) script. You must not have
ever typed footnotes.
  #4  
Old September 11th 04, 11:57 PM
Ed Rasimus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 11 Sep 2004 22:30:08 GMT, (Tom Cervo) wrote:

Flynn said it's "very unlikely" that the memos are legit, adding that
he knows of no typewriter fonts using proportionally spaced Roman type
with a raised "th" available in the 1970s.


Come off it, Dan, anyone who used a typewriter knew the trick of lifting the
roller a smidge (or lowering it) for sub (or super) script. You must not have
ever typed footnotes.


And, anyone who used a typewriter knows that the trick results in a
sub or super that is the same size type face as the typewriter's, not
the smaller word processor font used for sub/supers.

But, the more important questions relate to why the commander is
writing memos about pressure from a superior who retired 18 months
earlier and hence was no longer above him.

Or, why is the commander ordering Bush for a physical just two weeks
into his 90 period of eligibility? Or, since when does a squadron
commander issue orders for flight physicals (they don't!)

Or why does the commander identify a CYA memo as a CYA? If you're
really trying to cover your ass you don't point it out in the subject
line.

Or, why is the commander writing orders to a subordinate that he has
already approved for temporary posting to another state in a unit
which at the time had no airplanes to fly and over which he had no
authority?

Or, why does the commander's wife and son deny that he could type,
that he was a memo writer or that he had any problem with Lt. Bush who
he had commended very publicly on the record the year before?


Ed Rasimus
Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret)
"When Thunder Rolled"
"Phantom Flights, Bangkok Nights"
Both from Smithsonian Books
***
www.thunderchief.org
  #5  
Old September 12th 04, 01:22 AM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tom Cervo" wrote in message
...
Flynn said it's "very unlikely" that the memos are legit, adding that
he knows of no typewriter fonts using proportionally spaced Roman type
with a raised "th" available in the 1970s.


Come off it, Dan, anyone who used a typewriter knew the trick of lifting

the
roller a smidge (or lowering it) for sub (or super) script. You must not

have
ever typed footnotes.


In smaller case than the rest of the document? Not to mention that anytime I
ever did that with an IBM Selectric, when I tried to go back to the original
line I invariable found the following type to be just a *smidgen* out of
vertical alignment with what I had done before.

Brooks


  #6  
Old September 12th 04, 01:27 AM
Bob Coe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ed Rasimus" wrote

But, the more important questions relate to why the commander is
writing memos about pressure from a superior who retired 18 months
earlier and hence was no longer above him.

Or, why is the commander ordering Bush for a physical just two weeks
into his 90 period of eligibility? Or, since when does a squadron
commander issue orders for flight physicals (they don't!)

Or why does the commander identify a CYA memo as a CYA? If you're
really trying to cover your ass you don't point it out in the subject
line.

Or, why is the commander writing orders to a subordinate that he has
already approved for temporary posting to another state in a unit
which at the time had no airplanes to fly and over which he had no
authority?

Or, why does the commander's wife and son deny that he could type,
that he was a memo writer or that he had any problem with Lt. Bush who
he had commended very publicly on the record the year before?


All of your points are right on the mark!

I just don't see how a person like Dan Rather could be so easily duped by
these forgeries. They weren't even originals! Hell even I can cut out someone's
signature and put it on any letter I want with just a Xerox machine. Today
I would just use my scanner and add it to my MS Word document.

No, I think Dan Rather was putting his reputation behind a known
forgery, to give it credence, and to hurt the Republican party. I hope
it now results in his finally being put out to pasture (which should have
happened 10 years ago anyway). Same with the other scum-bags on
60 minutes, who are always making a mountain out of a mole hill.


  #7  
Old September 12th 04, 01:29 AM
Bob Coe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tom Cervo" wrote
Flynn said it's "very unlikely" that the memos are legit, adding that
he knows of no typewriter fonts using proportionally spaced Roman type
with a raised "th" available in the 1970s.


Come off it, Dan, anyone who used a typewriter knew the trick of lifting the
roller a smidge (or lowering it) for sub (or super) script. You must not have
ever typed footnotes.


Really!?? How do you get the font size to change?

No, the first typewriter to do that was the Selectric, as it had scripts of a
smaller font on the typing ball.


  #8  
Old September 12th 04, 01:30 AM
Jack G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

What trick did you use on your typewriter to get it to do proportional
fonts - Do the terms "pica" and "elite" mean anything to you?

Jack


"Tom Cervo" wrote in message
...
Flynn said it's "very unlikely" that the memos are legit, adding that
he knows of no typewriter fonts using proportionally spaced Roman type
with a raised "th" available in the 1970s.


Come off it, Dan, anyone who used a typewriter knew the trick of lifting

the
roller a smidge (or lowering it) for sub (or super) script. You must not

have
ever typed footnotes.



  #9  
Old September 12th 04, 01:32 AM
Jarg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bob Coe" wrote in message
news:%JM0d.23965$ni.13950@okepread01...


I just don't see how a person like Dan Rather could be so easily duped by
these forgeries. They weren't even originals! Hell even I can cut out
someone's
signature and put it on any letter I want with just a Xerox machine.
Today
I would just use my scanner and add it to my MS Word document.



I give him the benefit of the doubt - he saw what he wanted to see.


No, I think Dan Rather was putting his reputation behind a known
forgery, to give it credence, and to hurt the Republican party. I hope
it now results in his finally being put out to pasture (which should have
happened 10 years ago anyway). Same with the other scum-bags on
60 minutes, who are always making a mountain out of a mole hill.



I'm sure he has no qualms about hurting the Republican party, but I still
think it unlikely he knew.

Jarg


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tips on Getting Your Instrument Rating Sooner and at Lower Cost Fred Instrument Flight Rules 21 October 19th 04 07:31 AM
U.S. Air Force Moves Ahead With Studies On Air-Breathing Engines Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 October 29th 03 04:31 AM
Air Force Battlelabs working to keep service ahead of the curve Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 July 31st 03 09:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.