A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Accidents happen...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old November 23rd 04, 04:24 AM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Aviation isn't all that difficult, but it is extremely unforgiving of poor
judgment or inattention.


This is a good quote. Can I use it if I give you credit?


Sure -- but, as others have pointed out, it's really a paraphrase.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"


  #12  
Old November 23rd 04, 07:09 AM
Manuel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Larry Dighera wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:27:29 +0100, Manuel
wrote in ::

Is there a possibility that the cause may have been wake turbulence?



Apparently not: there were no other airplanes around before him.

-Manuel




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #13  
Old November 23rd 04, 07:10 AM
Manuel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jay Honeck wrote:

Just curious: Was he trying to do a "go around"?



Apparently yes ... actually, it was a bit more complicated than that.
Unfortunately I'm not supposed to share the other information I have
right now. I'll let you know when everything is over... thank you for
your replies!

-Manuel


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #14  
Old November 23rd 04, 12:46 PM
Rolf Blom
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 2004-11-22 20:20, Friedrich Ostertag wrote:
Hi Bob,


"Flying is not inherently dangerous, but to an even greater extent
than the sea, it is terribly unforgiving of carelessness, incapacity,
or neglect" - anon, quotation familiar to all aviators.



To which another anon has answered:

"Flying IS inherently dangerous. Only a well trained crew and a well
maintained aircraft can keep the risk at an acceptable level."

I like this. Applies to other things, too.

regards,
Friedrich

--
for personal email please remove "entfernen" from my adress


Living is dangerous.
But no fear, you will be OK afterwards.

/JC (I think)
  #15  
Old November 23rd 04, 05:51 PM
CHANGE USERNAME TO westes
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"C Kingsbury" wrote in message
ink.net...
The number in the book is for a plane at gross weight with the engine at
idle. It's the number at which the rudder runs out of effectiveness to

keep
the nose aligned with the runway. So you blow it over with the prop. Of


How do you use prop on a single engine plane to improve alignment to the
runway? Rudder and ailerons I understand. And on a dual engine airplane I
understand how you could (in theory) use prop to improve alignment. But
how would you use prop in a single engine airplane?

--
Will
westes AT earthbroadcast.com



  #16  
Old November 23rd 04, 06:19 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"CHANGE USERNAME TO westes" wrote in
message ...
[...] But how would you use prop in a single engine airplane?


I assume he means that with power on (rather than at idle), the prop
slipstream provides a some extra rudder authority.


  #17  
Old November 23rd 04, 08:53 PM
Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"C Kingsbury" wrote
The number in the book is for a plane at gross weight with the engine at
idle. It's the number at which the rudder runs out of effectiveness to keep
the nose aligned with the runway.


Actually, no. It would make sense if that were the case, which is why
it's not

In reality, the max demonstrated crosswind component is at least 20%
of Vso - and above and beyond that, it's a compromise between what
legal and marketing want. It's certainly not the best the factory
test pilot can do, and depending on technique it need not be the best
you can do, but there is no guarantee that the max demonstrated
crosswind component will not be more (or less) than the plane can
handle by the wing-low method at short field approach speed. It's not
a certification requirement.

BTW, lightly loaded makes crosswind harder, not easier, because your
stall speed goes down, and thus the crosswind as a fraction of stall
speed goes up.

Michael
  #18  
Old November 24th 04, 08:16 AM
Dylan Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , CHANGE USERNAME TO westes wrote:
How do you use prop on a single engine plane to improve alignment to the
runway? Rudder and ailerons I understand. And on a dual engine airplane I


In a tractor configured (i.e. engine and prop on the nose, single fin
directly in line with the fuselage and in the propwash) single engine
plane, at low speeds the propwash over the tail surfaces make the rudder
much more effective if you give the engine some power. Fly a taildragger
which has a free castoring tailwheel and useless brakes and you soon
learn how a quick 'goose' on the throttle can help you taxi around a
corner in a quartering tailwind.

--
Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
"Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee"
  #19  
Old November 24th 04, 09:14 PM
Roger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 09:27:29 +0100, Manuel
wrote:

Unfortunately accidents do happen, but it was the first time I had
somewhat to do with it. The airplane I usually fly with, a Piper Arrow
from the local flight school and FBO, crashed on landing during a
cross-country flight to Florence (Italy). The plane suddenly banked to
the left 10 feet over the runway, then struck the airport fence.

snip
This event really struck me, you never think this can happen to you, or
at your FBO.

Sorry if that's not really a constructive post, I just had to tell
someone...

First, I'm glad to hear every one is going to make it.

Actually I think the post is quite appropriate from a number of
angles.

Once things deviate from normal they can go to Hell unbelievably fast.

The flight is never over until you are parked.

I've seen planes depart from controlled flight and that slippery slope
is not only slippery and steep it gets steeper by the moment.

The points being, what ever the reason for the departure from
controlled flight it can happen at any time and without warning.
I've had the Deb stall in level flight at 5500 feet on a beautiful
clear day. I've seen a 172 on final get a bit slow, over correct
with power, and then turn it into a lawn dart. Fortunately no one was
even hurt but the plane was pretty much totaled. The wings even had
shoulders. I saw a Beech Mousekateer land with a slight down wind and
start to porpoise. Three times and out. He busted the nose gear off
out on the main runway right in front of a whole crowd of parents
waiting for their kids to go on "Young Eagles" rides. There sat that
poor old Musketeer with it's tail feathers sticking up in the air.

Never get complacent or relax your guard until the plane is parked.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

-Manuel
PPL(A) SEP


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---


  #20  
Old November 25th 04, 10:00 AM
Julian Scarfe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bob Fry" wrote in message
...

"Flying is not inherently dangerous, but to an even greater extent
than the sea, it is terribly unforgiving of carelessness, incapacity,
or neglect" - anon, quotation familiar to all aviators.


Attributed to Capt A G Lamplugh, one of the founders of the British Aviation
Insurance Group.

Julian Scarfe


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Aviation accidents alarming Marines Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 September 11th 04 08:35 PM
Aviation accidents alarming Marines Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 11th 04 08:35 PM
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 41 November 20th 03 05:39 AM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.