If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Can I check something with you guys
http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=12327
The above link, when you view it, does it look identical to the image below. reason why I ask is on my monitor, the link above is obviously compressed but the image below is the same image, just not uploaded onto my website. The image i post below, looks good and the compression is nowhere near as evident. Yet it is the same image. Is this glaringly obvious to you guys as well. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Can I check something with you guys
"Glenn" wrote in message
... http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=12327 The above link, when you view it, does it look identical to the image below. reason why I ask is on my monitor, the link above is obviously compressed but the image below is the same image, just not uploaded onto my website. The image i post below, looks good and the compression is nowhere near as evident. Yet it is the same image. Is this glaringly obvious to you guys as well. They look the same to me. -- -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Can I check something with you guys
The attachment size is 116k, but the size of the image on the website is
76k. I can't distinguish the difference visually. Richard "Glenn" wrote in message ... http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=12327 The above link, when you view it, does it look identical to the image below. reason why I ask is on my monitor, the link above is obviously compressed but the image below is the same image, just not uploaded onto my website. The image i post below, looks good and the compression is nowhere near as evident. Yet it is the same image. Is this glaringly obvious to you guys as well. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Can I check something with you guys
I don't know the technical terms but this is what it looks like to me: when
I see the image in Outlook Express it's smaller (27x15 cm or so) because I have the folders column on the left hand side of the screen. If I open it then I get a full screen image of about 33x22 cms). Going to the Warbirdz site it opens as a 32 x 20 cm image. The Warbirdz image is the better of the three from a viewer's perspective. Does the dpi change? I dunno. I just know what looks good. Maybe the key is that on thw Warbirdz site it's a largepic and for the newsgroup it's downsized to save bandwidth. That's why we visit both locations. Show us a good photo in the newsgroup and we know it's better on Warbirdz. It's not something that jumps out to people. You are trying to make us think....... Regards from Pensacola, Tom "Richard Connell" wrote in message ... The attachment size is 116k, but the size of the image on the website is 76k. I can't distinguish the difference visually. Richard "Glenn" wrote in message ... http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=12327 The above link, when you view it, does it look identical to the image below. reason why I ask is on my monitor, the link above is obviously compressed but the image below is the same image, just not uploaded onto my website. The image i post below, looks good and the compression is nowhere near as evident. Yet it is the same image. Is this glaringly obvious to you guys as well. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Can I check something with you guys
"Tom Callahan" wrote in message ... I don't know the technical terms but this is what it looks like to me: when I see the image in Outlook Express it's smaller (27x15 cm or so) because I have the folders column on the left hand side of the screen. If I open it then I get a full screen image of about 33x22 cms). Going to the Warbirdz site it opens as a 32 x 20 cm image. The Warbirdz image is the better of the three from a viewer's perspective. Does the dpi change? I dunno. I just know what looks good. Maybe the key is that on thw Warbirdz site it's a largepic and for the newsgroup it's downsized to save bandwidth. That's why we visit both locations. Show us a good photo in the newsgroup and we know it's better on Warbirdz. It's not something that jumps out to people. You are trying to make us think....... Not at all. On my monitor it is so different it's not funny. The sky is just a series of pastel lines basically. I've noticed that compression is more visible since I got this monitor but this image is by far the worst. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Can I check something with you guys
In article ,
"Glenn" wrote: "Tom Callahan" wrote in message ... I don't know the technical terms but this is what it looks like to me: when I see the image in Outlook Express it's smaller (27x15 cm or so) because I have the folders column on the left hand side of the screen. If I open it then I get a full screen image of about 33x22 cms). Going to the Warbirdz site it opens as a 32 x 20 cm image. The Warbirdz image is the better of the three from a viewer's perspective. Does the dpi change? I dunno. I just know what looks good. Maybe the key is that on thw Warbirdz site it's a largepic and for the newsgroup it's downsized to save bandwidth. That's why we visit both locations. Show us a good photo in the newsgroup and we know it's better on Warbirdz. It's not something that jumps out to people. You are trying to make us think....... Not at all. On my monitor it is so different it's not funny. The sky is just a series of pastel lines basically. I've noticed that compression is more visible since I got this monitor but this image is by far the worst. That sounds like your monitor is set to display thousands of colors rather than millions. -- Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus (341- 270 BC) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Can I check something with you guys
"John Meyer" wrote in message ... In article , "Glenn" wrote: "Tom Callahan" wrote in message ... I don't know the technical terms but this is what it looks like to me: when I see the image in Outlook Express it's smaller (27x15 cm or so) because I have the folders column on the left hand side of the screen. If I open it then I get a full screen image of about 33x22 cms). Going to the Warbirdz site it opens as a 32 x 20 cm image. The Warbirdz image is the better of the three from a viewer's perspective. Does the dpi change? I dunno. I just know what looks good. Maybe the key is that on thw Warbirdz site it's a largepic and for the newsgroup it's downsized to save bandwidth. That's why we visit both locations. Show us a good photo in the newsgroup and we know it's better on Warbirdz. It's not something that jumps out to people. You are trying to make us think....... Not at all. On my monitor it is so different it's not funny. The sky is just a series of pastel lines basically. I've noticed that compression is more visible since I got this monitor but this image is by far the worst. That sounds like your monitor is set to display thousands of colors rather than millions. It does, or did. It resolved itself. But picture me looking at the same image. one in my saved folder on my D Drive and the one on my webpage. Both are identical files but one displays differently. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Can I check something with you guys
In article ,
"Glenn" wrote: They look the same to me. Viewed using MT-Newswatcher and Safari on an Intel Mac/OS10.4.10 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Can I check something with you guys
"Glenn" wrote in message ... http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=12327 The above link, when you view it, does it look identical to the image below. reason why I ask is on my monitor, the link above is obviously compressed but the image below is the same image, just not uploaded onto my website. The image i post below, looks good and the compression is nowhere near as evident. Yet it is the same image. Is this glaringly obvious to you guys as well. It looks to me that the one that you posted with your question is not as fuzzy as the one posted to the url. IMHO anyway. Robert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Can I check something with you guys
"Glenn" wrote in message ... http://www.warbirdz.net/largepic.php?ID=12327 The above link, when you view it, does it look identical to the image below. reason why I ask is on my monitor, the link above is obviously compressed but the image below is the same image, just not uploaded onto my website. The image i post below, looks good and the compression is nowhere near as evident. Yet it is the same image. Is this glaringly obvious to you guys as well. The monitor will have more impact on how you see the pictures. on my viewsonic hi-res flat panel, I can tell th edifference between these two copies, but only barely. The one on the webpage shows some evidence of compression, but you have to look real hard to see it. I had to move both images directly over each other and toggle the windows to see the changes. Luke |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SSA: Good Guys & Bad Guys | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | October 5th 06 04:11 AM |
Guys, guys, guys -- the party is TOMORROW night! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 3 | July 24th 05 05:26 AM |
Guys | Dummy | Owning | 2 | August 26th 04 01:01 AM |
Guys | Dummy | General Aviation | 1 | August 23rd 04 11:42 PM |
You guys were right -- thanks! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 27 | July 28th 03 10:50 PM |