A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sea Harrier vertically landing with unused missiles



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 23rd 06, 05:12 AM posted to sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sea Harrier vertically landing with unused missiles

Could Sea Harrier FRS1 safely land vertically with two unused Sea
Eagles attached in hot weather condition?

  #2  
Old March 23rd 06, 09:14 AM posted to sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sea Harrier vertically landing with unused missiles


"KDR" wrote in message
oups.com...
Could Sea Harrier FRS1 safely land vertically with two unused Sea
Eagles attached in hot weather condition?

Your question evokes the immediate response ... insufficient data.
Read the ODM ... (Operating Data Manuals)
The manual consisted of lots of charts and a 'data point' can be extracted
by 'entering' one chart with a condition (say weight) against 'day' (ISA + n
deg) then perhaps taking that datapoint onto another chart reading off
height (above mean sea level) which might give you an answer to your
question.
Of hand; - two minutes after take-off from Nairobi in mid-summer... ?
whereas after a two hour sortie from the Falklands in mid-winter ... ?
Context, as they say, is everything.

--

Brian


  #3  
Old March 23rd 06, 09:30 PM posted to sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sea Harrier vertically landing with unused missiles

Sea Eagles? Probably not.

Sea Harriers are known for having power difficulties in warm weather
and Sea Eagles are heavy.

There were a number of situations in Iraq where Sea Harriers were
unable to participate because of the weather which is why they are
being retired and replaced by RAF GR.xs.

  #4  
Old March 24th 06, 03:02 AM posted to sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sea Harrier vertically landing with unused missiles

Airyx wrote:
Sea Eagles? Probably not.

Sea Harriers are known for having power difficulties in warm weather
and Sea Eagles are heavy.

There were a number of situations in Iraq where Sea Harriers were
unable to participate because of the weather which is why they are
being retired and replaced by RAF GR.xs.


Yes Sea Harrier FA2 does have that problem but what I want to know
about is FRS1.

  #5  
Old March 24th 06, 04:03 AM posted to sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sea Harrier vertically landing with unused missiles


Brian Sharrock wrote:
"KDR" wrote in message
oups.com...
Could Sea Harrier FRS1 safely land vertically with two unused Sea
Eagles attached in hot weather condition?

Your question evokes the immediate response ... insufficient data.
Read the ODM ... (Operating Data Manuals)
The manual consisted of lots of charts and a 'data point' can be extracted
by 'entering' one chart with a condition (say weight) against 'day' (ISA + n
deg) then perhaps taking that datapoint onto another chart reading off
height (above mean sea level) which might give you an answer to your
question.
Of hand; - two minutes after take-off from Nairobi in mid-summer... ?
whereas after a two hour sortie from the Falklands in mid-winter ... ?
Context, as they say, is everything.

--

Brian


OK, could Sea Harrier FRS1 safely land vertically on the Invincible
class carrier in the South China Sea in mid-summer with two unused Sea
Eagles after a two-hour mission?

Was there any case the FRS1 had to jettison unused Sea Eagles before
landing on the carrier?

  #6  
Old March 24th 06, 09:21 AM posted to sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sea Harrier vertically landing with unused missiles


"KDR" wrote in message
oups.com...

Brian Sharrock wrote:
"KDR" wrote in message
oups.com...
Could Sea Harrier FRS1 safely land vertically with two unused Sea
Eagles attached in hot weather condition?

Your question evokes the immediate response ... insufficient data.
Read the ODM ... (Operating Data Manuals)
The manual consisted of lots of charts and a 'data point' can be
extracted
by 'entering' one chart with a condition (say weight) against 'day' (ISA
+ n
deg) then perhaps taking that datapoint onto another chart reading off
height (above mean sea level) which might give you an answer to your
question.
Of hand; - two minutes after take-off from Nairobi in mid-summer... ?
whereas after a two hour sortie from the Falklands in mid-winter ... ?
Context, as they say, is everything.

--

Brian


OK, could Sea Harrier FRS1 safely land vertically on the Invincible
class carrier in the South China Sea in mid-summer with two unused Sea
Eagles after a two-hour mission?

Was there any case the FRS1 had to jettison unused Sea Eagles before
landing on the carrier?


Sorry, but you would have to read the ODM. If you don't have access to the
data you probably aren't authorised to have it. [its tough, but it's life]
..If you have a legitimate need-to-know; try posing the question to the
manufacturer's marketing department.

--

Brian


  #7  
Old March 24th 06, 08:29 PM posted to sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sea Harrier vertically landing with unused missiles


KDR wrote:
Brian Sharrock wrote:
"KDR" wrote in message
oups.com...
Could Sea Harrier FRS1 safely land vertically with two unused Sea
Eagles attached in hot weather condition?

Your question evokes the immediate response ... insufficient data.
Read the ODM ... (Operating Data Manuals)
The manual consisted of lots of charts and a 'data point' can be extracted
by 'entering' one chart with a condition (say weight) against 'day' (ISA + n
deg) then perhaps taking that datapoint onto another chart reading off
height (above mean sea level) which might give you an answer to your
question.
Of hand; - two minutes after take-off from Nairobi in mid-summer... ?
whereas after a two hour sortie from the Falklands in mid-winter ... ?
Context, as they say, is everything.

--

Brian


OK, could Sea Harrier FRS1 safely land vertically on the Invincible
class carrier in the South China Sea in mid-summer with two unused Sea
Eagles after a two-hour mission?

Was there any case the FRS1 had to jettison unused Sea Eagles before
landing on the carrier?


I would imagine that after 2 hours the fuel load would be so reduced
that the weight of the missiles wouldn't come into the equation.
Dumping missiles would get one on jankers quicksmart

  #8  
Old March 25th 06, 09:04 PM posted to sci.military.naval,rec.aviation.military,rec.aviation.military.naval
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sea Harrier vertically landing with unused missiles

In rec.aviation.military KDR wrote:
snip
OK, could Sea Harrier FRS1 safely land vertically on the Invincible
class carrier in the South China Sea in mid-summer with two unused Sea
Eagles after a two-hour mission?

Was there any case the FRS1 had to jettison unused Sea Eagles before
landing on the carrier?


The trivial way would be to look up the weight of a Sea Eagle.
600Kg per.
So, 1200Kg.

The first site I found gave 2295Kg of fuel for a model of the harrier.

So, if it can land fully fueled, but without the eagles, then it can
land with about half and them.
Assuming no COG/... issues.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! Eliot Coweye Home Built 237 February 13th 06 03:55 AM
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? tom pettit Home Built 35 September 29th 05 02:24 PM
Mini-500 Accident Analysis Dennis Fetters Rotorcraft 16 September 3rd 05 11:35 AM
Cuban Missle Crisis - Ron Knott Greasy Rider© @invalid.com Naval Aviation 0 June 2nd 05 09:14 PM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.