A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Vapor lock question????



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 5th 07, 02:54 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
wise purchaser
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 49
Default Vapor lock question????

Have a cessna 150 with 150 HP conversion. I burn regular mogas for
the most part. My bird can tanker up to 60 gallons so I have very
long range capability.

The plane runs fine on the mogas not to mention the SAVINGS! Avgas
here is running as much as 5 bucks a gallon! car gas runs about $
2.45 gal

Since the airplane is gravity feed ( the engine has a engine driven
fuel pump) could I have a problem with vapor lock?? What would be
the indications of the lock? at what point could i expect vapor
lock?? start up? takeoff!!! ???

Thanks!!

By the way the 150/150 is AWSOME it kicks ass and takes names on
takeoff and cruise

with the long range can stay in the air almost 10 hours sipping the
MOGAS with regular cessna 150 100 HP cruise power ( 95 KTS ) or
6 hrs with pushing the power up till 120 KTS
9.5 gal hr

I Have the E/ I electronic flow meter coupled with the KLN 90 GPS and
I can set the fuel flow right on the nut!!!

  #2  
Old April 5th 07, 02:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default Vapor lock question????

wise purchaser wrote:
Have a cessna 150 with 150 HP conversion. I burn regular mogas for
the most part. My bird can tanker up to 60 gallons so I have very
long range capability.


Wow, even with mogas you double the value of the aircraft by filling
up :-)


The plane runs fine on the mogas not to mention the SAVINGS! Avgas
here is running as much as 5 bucks a gallon! car gas runs about $
2.45 gal


It actually runs better on mogas. 100LL is not particularly low in
lead compared to anything other than the 100/130 it replaced. It's
got 4 times the lead that the old 80 grade did.

Since the airplane is gravity feed ( the engine has a engine driven
fuel pump) could I have a problem with vapor lock?? What would be
the indications of the lock? at what point could i expect vapor
lock?? start up? takeoff!!! ???

You're not likely to see it. One of the criteria for getting that
STC is to flight test for the conditions condusive to vapor locking.
Most commonly they are high ambient temperatures and very low fuel
flow rates, low pressures. In my plane (not approved for avgas) the
worst case
is a hot day, shutting down for 30minutes and letting the fuel
boil inside the lines not moving and then try to restart.

Can't vouch for 150/152's but the 172 does have a small locking
problem which was responsible for the suggestion at high altitudes
that you use LEFT or RIGHT rather than both to increase the fuel
flow rate.
  #3  
Old April 5th 07, 03:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Frank Stutzman[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 74
Default Vapor lock question????

Ron Natalie wrote:
You're not likely to see it. One of the criteria for getting that
STC is to flight test for the conditions condusive to vapor locking.
Most commonly they are high ambient temperatures and very low fuel
flow rates, low pressures. In my plane (not approved for avgas) the

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Ah, er, don't you have a typo there, Ron?

I thought you had converted your Navion to some flavor of 550. To the
the best that I know, all such engines are approved for avgas. If anything
I would say that they are not approved for autofuel.

--
Frank Stutzman
Bonanza N494B "Hula Girl"
Hood River, OR (soon to be Boise, ID)

  #4  
Old April 5th 07, 04:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
rq3
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 19
Default Vapor lock question????

Frank Stutzman wrote:
Ron Natalie wrote:
You're not likely to see it. One of the criteria for getting that
STC is to flight test for the conditions condusive to vapor locking.
Most commonly they are high ambient temperatures and very low fuel
flow rates, low pressures. In my plane (not approved for avgas) the

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Ah, er, don't you have a typo there, Ron?

I thought you had converted your Navion to some flavor of 550. To the
the best that I know, all such engines are approved for avgas. If anything
I would say that they are not approved for autofuel.

There are two STC's required for running on mogas - one for the engine,
one for the airframe. No Navion is STC'd to run on mogas.

Rip
  #5  
Old April 5th 07, 04:54 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default Vapor lock question????

Frank Stutzman wrote:
Ron Natalie wrote:
You're not likely to see it. One of the criteria for getting that
STC is to flight test for the conditions condusive to vapor locking.
Most commonly they are high ambient temperatures and very low fuel
flow rates, low pressures. In my plane (not approved for avgas) the

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Ah, er, don't you have a typo there, Ron?

I thought you had converted your Navion to some flavor of 550. To the
the best that I know, all such engines are approved for avgas. If anything
I would say that they are not approved for autofuel.


Ooops...that should say not approved for mogas. I don't know if their
are *ANY* planes not approved for MOGAS.

There are no Navions, regardless of engine, that are approved for AVGAS.
The EAA doesn't get into anything other than 4-cyl I believe. Petersen
at one point test flew a Navion and it failed the tests. They couldn't
tell me what engine or fuel system (the Navion has probably over a dozen
different combinations AS IT CAME FROM THE FACTORY, not withstanding
those put on by STC) was the one tested and failed.

Yes the IO-550 is right out anyway.
  #6  
Old April 5th 07, 07:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,175
Default Vapor lock question????

Ron Natalie wrote:

Ooops...that should say not approved for mogas. I don't know if their
are *ANY* planes not approved for MOGAS.

ARGH! that should say AVGAS.

My brain is turning to cottage cheese, large curd.
  #7  
Old April 5th 07, 09:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 979
Default Vapor lock question????


"Ron Natalie" wrote in message ...
: Ron Natalie wrote:
:
: Ooops...that should say not approved for mogas. I don't know if their
: are *ANY* planes not approved for MOGAS.
:
: ARGH! that should say AVGAS.
:
: My brain is turning to cottage cheese, large curd.

Low fat...or regular?

;-)



  #8  
Old April 5th 07, 10:59 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,130
Default Vapor lock question????


Vapour lock is seldom an issue with gravity-feed systems, since
the fuel is under positive pressure (though very low positive
pressure). Vapour lock happens most often when the fuel is beling
pulled rather than pushed, as in a low-wing with the tanks below the
engine's fuel pump. The lowered pressure on the fuel in the lines
lowers its boiling point, and the heat in the cowl does the rest.
Mogas in a gravity-fed system can be a problem at altitude,
since the atmospheric pressure is low, and the fuel's boiling point
comes down. If the engine is working hard and the ambient temp is high
enough, the heat in the cowl might raise the fuel to the lowered
boiling point. As the fuel boils, the vapours expand and prevent any
further fuel flow. Carburetors and fuel injectors don't work well on
vapours.
Mogas has a higher vapour pressure than avgas, which means its
boiling point will also be lower.

We used to run mogas in our O-200s and O-320s. The
Continentals didn't like it, and the valves would stick and the valve
seats would wear out sooner. The old-technology bronze valve guides
relied on the lead for lubrication, and so did the valve heads and
seats. The Lycomings gave somewhat less trouble, but we still had
exhaust valve guide wear and valve burning problems with it. Whwn the
guide wears, it lets the valve hit the seat a little off-center and
makes the seat wear to an oval, allowing it to leak and burn. The
problems went away when we went to straight 100LL.
Today's automobiles have much more advanced valve
technology that allows them to burn the harsher mogas. The
ContinentoLycosaurus prefers the diet it's been on since it was born
in prehistoric times.
Running a mix of 100LL and mogas didn't work much better than
straight mogas. Sometimes these economy measures are false and end up
costing more in the long run. We run a flight school, and besides the
cost of expensive cylinder repairs, which is bad enough, the downtime
eats into the budget real quick. 100LL is much cheaper for us.

Dan

  #9  
Old April 5th 07, 11:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
flynrider via AviationKB.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 45
Default Vapor lock question????

If you're going to get vapor lock running mogas, spring is probably the
time it'll happen. Oil companies formulate mogas for different seasons.
Winter mogas has a low vapor pressure which allows it to vaporize more easily
in lower temperatures. Summer blends have a higher vapor pressure to resist
vapor lock in warmer temperatures. The problem exists when using a winter
blend of mogas when temperatures have warmed up. If you're going to get
vapor lock, that's when it's most likely to happen.

It's not a problem in cars, since a typical gas station turns over its
stock one or more times a week. It can be a problem if you get your mogas
from an airport. It can take weeks or months to turnover a full load of fuel.


This was a problem with a friend of mine that runs an FBO in the southwest.
He used to have a self-serve mogas pump at his relatively small airport, and
it would take him a couple of months to sell a 2,000 gallon load of it.
Invariably, when the hot weather hit, he would get reports of vapor lock from
pilots who were buying his winter mogas. Eventually, he considered it too
much of a potential liability and shut down the mogas pump.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)

--
Message posted via http://www.aviationkb.com

  #10  
Old April 6th 07, 02:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 972
Default Vapor lock question????

("Blueskies" wrote)
: My brain is turning to cottage cheese, large curd.

Low fat...or regular?



Expiration date?


Montblack
Best if used befo 10pm



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Linden Accident - Question about "Droop Lock" Bob Chilcoat Rotorcraft 6 October 6th 05 11:11 AM
Two Lock Rule? Robert M. Gary Piloting 62 June 16th 05 05:00 AM
Cherry Lock Rich Home Built 0 March 20th 05 11:33 PM
Vapor Lock Dale General Aviation 3 August 8th 04 03:50 PM
Ubisoft Lock On. Pilot Pete Simulators 3 January 26th 04 03:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.