A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

B-29 computer guided turrets



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 15th 04, 05:33 PM
Kevin Brooks
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"William Donzelli" wrote in message
om...
(Peter Stickney) wrote in message

...

All Gunners hy gyroscopic lead computing sights with stadiametric
ranging. As the Gunner tracked teh target, the gyroscopes measured
the rate of movement of the target in Azimuth and Elevation, The
Gunner would also track teh target in range, by using a "Motorcycle
throttle" type grip in the sight to size a ring of dots in the sight
picture to match the airplane's wingspan. Since the wingspan of an
attacking fighter would be known, or estimated slose enough, this
would give Range and Range Rate (Closing speed) information to hte
sight.


To add to this fine explanation, starting right around the beginning
of 1945, AN/APG-15 radars started making there way in B-29s. This was
a fairly small, cheap set that took much of the guesswork for figuring
range out of the gunners hands (although they could always go back to
the manual method, especially when the radars broke down).


True, but the radars were only installed on the B models during WWII,
meaning that they were largely limited to use by IIRC the 315th BW. The
remainder (and vast majority) of the Superfort fleet soldiered on with the
purely optical system. Note that the 315th BW is apparently the major source
of the oft-repeated apocryphal tale that all the B-29's had their guns
(except for tail mount) stripped and went into battle with reduced crews at
Lemay's behest; apparently that might have been the case for the 315th, or a
goodly portion of it, but little evidence exists that any of the other bomb
wings followed suit.

Brooks


--
William Donzelli



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NAS and associated computer system Newps Instrument Flight Rules 8 August 12th 04 05:12 AM
Computer STAR/SID names K. Ari Krupnikov Instrument Flight Rules 0 July 21st 04 10:22 AM
Rag and tube construction and computer models? BllFs6 Home Built 24 April 12th 04 12:20 PM
CONRAC CORP C5A COMPUTER TEST SET Mikel Giles Military Aviation 0 February 7th 04 05:09 PM
The prone postion for tail gunners versus turrets. The Enlightenment Military Aviation 8 July 22nd 03 11:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.