If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Cub Driver wrote in message . ..
On 15 Mar 2004 21:36:40 -0800, (Dazuixia) wrote: You know I was right Actually, I know you are wrong. That is the reason you delete the FACTS I provided? FACT is that at 1950, USA, both Korea governments, rest of the world all thought Korea was one SINGLE independent country. Be coward and bury your head into sand seems make you feel really good. What can I say! The first foreign army to enter South Korean was the In Min Gun. Are you telling me first foreign army to enter the CSA was the Yankees Led by Lincoln? You are not only IGNORANT but also cannot learn. Since I have proved that including U.S. of A. thought Korea was a SINGLE Country and that is why U.S. of A. proposed an UNIVERSAL election in WHOLE Korea in UN. How NK army was the FOREIGN ARMY? Because they were white rather than Koreans? Even USA government DID NOT say NK army were foreign army. You are free to insist to refuse the FACTS. Is this a common tactic you learned from your school age? The Americans came along about a week later. As an barbaric invasion army to the independent sovereign country Korea, or may be those armies are white Koreans, that will be very interesting. It is this invasion army who conducted barbaric killing to South Korean civilians intentionally: "In the summer of 1950, U.S. military forces opened fire on a group of South Korean refugees at a railroad trestle near the village of No Gun Ri. Survivors said hundreds died, mostly women and children. Retreating U.S. commanders had issued orders to shoot approaching civilians to guard against North Korean infiltrators among refugee columns." Refer: http://www.henryholt.com/nogunri/ Have a nice day! Dazuixia |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Cub Driver wrote in message . ..
On 16 Mar 2004 22:15:02 -0800, (Dazuixia) wrote: , rest of the world all thought Korea was one SINGLE independent country. B Curious that the United Nations didn't think so, then! Curious, do you know what United Nations thought? The NK was ANOTHER FOREIGN country of SK? Please provide your evidence. Like many Americans hanging on SSC, you know ZERO about the topic but like to speak before you learn the FACTs. The Security Council voted 7-1 to send troops to repel the In Min Gun. Yes, but not because the UN thought NK was a FOREING country. That time, most of UN countries were USA puppets. The peace loving country China, (PRC government) even not was in UN. Both PRC and USSR should have the veto power and both of them were not in the meeting. USSR was boycotting the UN because UN refuse to let the government who could real represent China to be in UN. If either of them were in the SSC meeting, the resolution would not be passed due to their veto power. Also the India did not vote to favor the resolution. The people in India, USSR, China were almost half of the people in the world. Now the countries in UN are more independent and do not want to be USA puppets any more. Now US treat UN like a piece of ****. Owe big money to UN, talking about, even conducting the barbaric invasion without UN approval. You should know the current FACT very well, right? E.g. USA conducts the barbaric invasion to Iraq against 80% of UN members opposition, not mention the reason given by Bush government was a pure LIE as most of USA invasion wars. Examples that USA used LIES to start barbaric invasion: 100,000 Albanians were murdered and ethnic cleaning happened in Kosovo, using this LIE USA kill thousands innocent people of Yugoslavia. Token Bay incident (NV gun boat attacked USA strong navy), multi millions innocent Vietnamese were killed by USA barbaric invasion started with this LIE. In Iraq tens of thousands innocent Iraqies were killed by the barbaric invasion of USA under the LIE WMD. NOTE: none of these barbaric invasion USA got the approval from UN. So UN just a tool, if it could be used to conduct a barbaric invasion to other weak independent sovereign countries, then use it. Otherwise, UN is nothing as Bush government show us. Later, the General Assembly voted (something like) 45-7 to order MacArthur to occupy North Korea, thus indicating that if it were to be a single country after the North Korean invasion, then it should be unified under the UN army. Should be unified under USA army and become semi-colony of USA. You are showing your true FACE, right? If Korea was a puppet country or semi-colony of USA, she could be viewed as a SINGLE country. Other wise the part which was not governed by USA puppet should be viewed as a FOREIGN country. Are you really that hypocritical to use obvious double standards? I wonder how could you have a straight face to believe the Korea should be only unified by the white westerner armies (whether you call it UN or not) but not the Native Korean army? You know what, in last two hundreds years, we have seen a lot of this kind of believers. Whether they were in No Sunset UK, in NZ Germany, or in the country where 90% Native Indians were ethnic cleaned. You feel to be proud of this history, but rest of the world may call it as shameless colonist and imperialism. It is hard to hope the peace loving people to have a same view on these aspects with the descendants of the colonists and imperialists. Both of us could hold our own views. When Iraq war has been proved to be started using a straight WMD LIE, more than 60% of people in a country who likes the to fight the wars to bully weak countries still support this barbaric invasion war. Same time they believe they are model of the world. What a pity! Here are some REAL FACTS rather than YOUR FAKE ones. On June 25, 1950, i.e. the day NK started Korea CIVIL WAR, UN passed a resolution: 28 (1950) Resolution June 1950. It said: "Mindful of the concern expressed by the General Assembly in its resolutions 195 (II) of 12 December 1948 and 293 (IV) of 21 October 1949 about the consequences which might follow unless Member States refrained from acts derogatory to the results sought to be achieved by the United Nations in bringing about the complete independence and unity of Korea." ... "Determines that this action (NK offense) constitutes a breach of the peace; and ..." UN first confirmed the goal to "bringing about the complete independence and unity of Korea". By saying this, UN did treat Korea as one independence sovereign country though it was governed by two separate governments. Yes, the offense of NK was "a breach of the peace" in Korea. So was the unification war in U.S. of A. fought by President Lincoln led North Yankees. Neither cases should validate the foreign imperialist army to invade either Korea or United States. My friend, I tire of your rants. You have now been plonked. When your IGNORANCE, inconsistency, hypocrisy, double standards, even LIES are exposed to the netters by some more knowledgeable person, if I were you, I would make similar claim you did. You have all my sympathy. Again, keep learning the FACTS, then you will be smarter than you are! Have a nice day! Dazuixia (I recommend Agent to all newsgroup readers who would like to remain sane.) all the best -- Dan Ford email: (requires authentication) see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message ...
"Dazuixia" wrote in message m... Cub Driver wrote in message . .. It was the Korea CIVIL WAR before USA invasion. North Korea's army, under the direction of its government in Pyongyang, invaded South Korea across an internationally recognized border or demarcation line. I have answered this questions in the statements right after the statement you are commenting. You know I was right and then you delete them. Here I re-quote: " USA army was the FIRST FOREIGN army entered Korea CIVIL WAR. In 1950, including USA saw Korea as a WHOLE country. Both Korea governments also thought this way. In late 1940s, USA initiated a resolution in UN to hold an election in WHOLE Korea and the resolution was passed. So clearly Korea was viewed by both USA and UN as an SINGLE independent country rather than two separate countries. However, the elections were hold separately and two governments were elected. So, before USA army invaded Korea, there was Korea CIVIL WAR and the aggressor in the CIVIL war was NK. The UN decided otherwise. The force deployed in Korea was US led but its intervention was mandated by the UN security council and troops from many other nations took part. When many UN countries were USA puppets. Only USA army made sense (may be one UK and one Turkey brigade were two others had little real armies) in the war. Rest of countries in 17 allies were nothing. You may call the USA, UK barbaric invasion to Iraq as the invasion by 'troops from many other nations' since it contained way more 'nations'. However, rest of the world know it was a typical unilateral action. Do you know in most of the countries who support USA invaion to Iraq, most of the people oppose this barbaric invasion war, only their leaders were bribed by little Bush? You know, now USA treat UN as **** when UN could not be USA puppet any more, right? It is the internal affairs of Korea and UN charter clearly prevent FOREIGN forces to intervene the internal affairs of an independent country, especially military invasion intervention. On the contrary the action in Korea was specifically authorised by the UN resolutions 82,83,84 and 85 of 1950 None of then said NK was a FOREIGN country. As I said, that time UN was a puppet of USA. Now USA treat UN as a **** when she is not a puppet of USA any more. Here was a post I respond to your ally Cub Driver , it used a lot of FACTS and answered all your questions. Keep learning, you will be smarter. ************************************************** *********************** On 16 Mar 2004 22:15:02 -0800, (Dazuixia) wrote: , rest of the world all thought Korea was one SINGLE independent country. B Curious that the United Nations didn't think so, then! Curious, do you know what United Nations thought? The NK was ANOTHER FOREIGN country of SK? Please provide your evidence. Like many Americans hanging on SSC, you know ZERO about the topic but like to speak before you learn the FACTs. The Security Council voted 7-1 to send troops to repel the In Min Gun. Yes, but not because the UN thought NK was a FOREING country. That time, most of UN countries were USA puppets. The peace loving country China, (PRC government) even not was in UN. Both PRC and USSR should have the veto power and both of them were not in the meeting. USSR was boycotting the UN because UN refuse to let the government who could real represent China to be in UN. If either of them were in the SSC meeting, the resolution would not be passed due to their veto power. Also the India did not vote to favor the resolution. The people in India, USSR, China were almost half of the people in the world. Now the countries in UN are more independent and do not want to be USA puppets any more. Now US treat UN like a piece of ****. Owe big money to UN, talking about, even conducting the barbaric invasion without UN approval. You should know the current FACT very well, right? E.g. USA conducts the barbaric invasion to Iraq against 80% of UN members opposition, not mention the reason given by Bush government was a pure LIE as most of USA invasion wars. Examples that USA used LIES to start barbaric invasion: 100,000 Albanians were murdered and ethnic cleaning happened in Kosovo, using this LIE USA kill thousands innocent people of Yugoslavia. Token Bay incident (NV gun boat attacked USA strong navy), multi millions innocent Vietnamese were killed by USA barbaric invasion started with this LIE. In Iraq tens of thousands innocent Iraqies were killed by the barbaric invasion of USA under the LIE WMD. NOTE: none of these barbaric invasion USA got the approval from UN. So UN just a tool, if it could be used to conduct a barbaric invasion to other weak independent sovereign countries, then use it. Otherwise, UN is nothing as Bush government show us. Later, the General Assembly voted (something like) 45-7 to order MacArthur to occupy North Korea, thus indicating that if it were to be a single country after the North Korean invasion, then it should be unified under the UN army. Should be unified under USA army and become semi-colony of USA. You are showing your true FACE, right? If Korea was a puppet country or semi-colony of USA, she could be viewed as a SINGLE country. Other wise the part which was not governed by USA puppet should be viewed as a FOREIGN country. Are you really that hypocritical to use obvious double standards? I wonder how could you have a straight face to believe the Korea should be only unified by the white westerner armies (whether you call it UN or not) but not the Native Korean army? You know what, in last two hundreds years, we have seen a lot of this kind of believers. Whether they were in No Sunset UK, in NZ Germany, or in the country where 90% Native Indians were ethnic cleaned. You feel to be proud of this history, but rest of the world may call it as shameless colonist and imperialism. It is hard to hope the peace loving people to have a same view on these aspects with the descendants of the colonists and imperialists. Both of us could hold our own views. When Iraq war has been proved to be started using a straight WMD LIE, more than 60% of people in a country who likes the to fight the wars to bully weak countries still support this barbaric invasion war. Same time they believe they are model of the world. What a pity! Here are some REAL FACTS rather than YOUR FAKE ones. On June 25, 1950, i.e. the day NK started Korea CIVIL WAR, UN passed a resolution: 28 (1950) Resolution June 1950. It said: "Mindful of the concern expressed by the General Assembly in its resolutions 195 (II) of 12 December 1948 and 293 (IV) of 21 October 1949 about the consequences which might follow unless Member States refrained from acts derogatory to the results sought to be achieved by the United Nations in bringing about the complete independence and unity of Korea." ... "Determines that this action (NK offense) constitutes a breach of the peace; and ..." UN first confirmed the goal to "bringing about the complete independence and unity of Korea". By saying this, UN did treat Korea as one independence sovereign country though it was governed by two separate governments. Yes, the offense of NK was "a breach of the peace" in Korea. So was the unification war in U.S. of A. fought by President Lincoln led North Yankees. Neither cases should validate the foreign imperialist army to invade either Korea or United States. My friend, I tire of your rants. You have now been plonked. When your IGNORANCE, inconsistency, hypocrisy, double standards, even LIES are exposed to the netters by some more knowledgeable person, if I were you, I would make similar claim you did. You have all my sympathy. Again, keep learning the FACTS, then you will be smarter than you are! Have a nice day! Dazuixia ************************************************** ***************************** Have a nice weekend! Dazuixia Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Russian Air Force Woes - Time to start again? | Peter Kemp | Military Aviation | 31 | February 21st 04 02:10 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 10:19 AM |
US kill loss ratio versus Russian pilots in Korean War? | Rats | Military Aviation | 21 | January 26th 04 08:56 AM |
RUSSIAN WAR PLANES IN ASIA | James | Military Aviation | 2 | October 1st 03 11:25 PM |