If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#161
|
|||
|
|||
ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine
John Theune wrote:
I'll addresss the last first. You really think your name is a good identifier? Have you looked at a phone book lately? only one guy in the rest of the USA with the same last name, who design fancy women shoes in New York :-) definitely nobody else with the same combination of first name and last name; ok, may be I am a bit of an exception here, but this is good enough for a business or bank, especially when coupled with an account number. but at some point there is need for crossover between the systems and having multiple numbers will increase the chance of a mismatch being made. why? what possible reason would your bank have to know your medical history? or history of phone calls? As far as SSN not being unique, the system was designed to have it be unique, if it broke down then fix it. it has broken down, and it has not been fixed. I just spent several minutes goggling on the "SSN Not Unique" and while it had many hits none of them said anything about the number being assigned to multiple people. as good as Google is, this is not the only source of info out there by the way. I think you need to remove your tinfoil hat here. Ah, the good ol' 'you are paranoid' argument; right next to the 'but, I have nothing to hide' argument. if you believe that all that's needed is additional regulations to protect you, then you are naive. May be, you might be lucky to live at a time when the current administration is indeed following its own rules, and respect due process, and all that. But information collected about you will outlive any administration; now may be you are right, may be I am paranoid and we will never live in a country where one's freedom of travel can be limited by secret lists which you cannot correct, where due process is no longer respected, where one can be imprisoned indefinitely and tortured without access to a lawyer or the evidence used against him, only based on bad intel collected via non transparent means, where the constitution becomes just a 'goddamn piece of paper', etc. yeah, it can be only a bad dream, my imagination is really running wild, cannot possibly happen here. Your bank has no legitimate reason to cross reference your account and your phone calls nor will they as they is no business reason for them to do so. then why make it easily available in the first place? oh, I get it; you can trust them, they are good people, why would they want to do you harm? nay, they'll never be tempted to sell your information to the best bidder, even when it becomes one of the hottest commodity in these days and age, why would they? it is not as if they would want to make money, just to look after your welfare. And in any case, you can trust the government to take care of it and look after your best interest should it ever be abused. Right. now, you are good at googling; find out what was the first large scale use of information technology -- beware, it predates electronic computers -- where cross referencing of seemingly innocuous personal information was used to its full potential (search for 'Edwin Black', should be mandatory reading to anyone taking up an IT course); Sorry for being so completely off the topic of this group, but this is a serious matter, where complacency eventually kills. --Sylvain |
#162
|
|||
|
|||
ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine
John Theune wrote in news:7zjwf.1494$Tn6.742@trnddc04:
Jose wrote: I've been following the SSN debate for a bit and I have not yet seen any mention of the fact that there is a legitinmate nneed to a single identification number to tie together the various parts of people's information. I don't want all the various parts of my information to be tied together by other people for their benefit. Jose Not a problem, then don't deal with banks or insurance companies. Ahhh...another person who'd make an excellent citizen in the new world order....should I call you 'cousin'? Just three of many books that I think should be compulsory reading in school are "Brave New World", "1984", and "Farhenheit 451". I'm also reminded of that British series, "The Prisoner". "I am not a number! I am a free man!" Or we can all start worrying about becoming "obsolete" (Twilight Zone) Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
#163
|
|||
|
|||
ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine
Skywise wrote:
Just three of many books that I think should be compulsory reading in school are "Brave New World", "1984", and "Farhenheit 451". Two of those were compulsory when I was in high school. George Patterson Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to your slightly older self. |
#164
|
|||
|
|||
ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine
George Patterson wrote:
Skywise wrote: Just three of many books that I think should be compulsory reading in school are "Brave New World", "1984", and "Farhenheit 451". Two of those were compulsory when I was in high school. All three were, for various classes, when I was in high school, not all that long ago. Unfortunately, no one takes away any lessons from them. |
#165
|
|||
|
|||
ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine
at some point there is need for crossover between the systems
At what point would that be? Your bank has no legitimate reason to cross reference your account and your phone calls nor will they as they is no business reason for them to do so. Sure there is. And they have a business reason to cross reference my account with my health information too. Both are valuable, and banks are a business. I just don't want them to. My employer has a business reason to cross reference my bank account, my health information, my mortgage information, my phone calls, and everything I do on and off the job. I don't want them to. And anybody who gets any of my information has an easy method to get all the rest of it. I don't want them to. Jose -- Money: what you need when you run out of brains. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#166
|
|||
|
|||
ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine
"Farnham's Freehold" by Robert Heinlein
Ahhh...another person who'd make an excellent citizen in the new world order....should I call you 'cousin'? Just three of many books that I think should be compulsory reading in school are "Brave New World", "1984", and "Farhenheit 451". I'm also reminded of that British series, "The Prisoner". "I am not a number! I am a free man!" Or we can all start worrying about becoming "obsolete" (Twilight Zone) Brian Best regards, Jer/ "Flight instruction and mountain flying are my vocations!" -- Jer/ (Slash) Eberhard, Mountain Flying Aviation, LTD, Ft Collins, CO CELL 970 231-6325 EMAIL jeratfrii.com http://users.frii.com/jer/ C-206 N9513G, CFII Airplane&Glider FAA-DEN Aviation Safety Counselor CAP-CO Mission&Aircraft CheckPilot BM218 HAM N0FZD 235 Young Eagles! |
#167
|
|||
|
|||
ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 19:08:06 -0800, "Peter Duniho"
wrote in :: Anyone who thinks that comments to a NPRM will have any real effect on the outcome just hasn't been paying attention to the way the FAA has handled them. Well, perhaps an NPRM _meeting_ with representatives from six federal agencies listening to pilots will be more effective in getting a bad idea revoked: ------------------------------------------------------------- AOPA ePilot Volume 8, Issue 2 January 13, 2006 ------------------------------------------------------------- ADIZ DRAWS IRE FROM PILOTS DURING FIRST PUBLIC MEETING More than 200 people on Thursday filled a conference room in Columbia, Maryland, and almost all were there to tell federal officials why the Washington, D.C., Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) shouldn't be made permanent. "The ADIZ should be abolished," said Scott Proudfoot, one of the first speakers at the public meeting. He was speaking for the air traffic controllers union, NATCA, and added, "The ADIZ is nothing but a burden on the users and the controllers." AOPA had pushed for public meetings, arguing that regulators needed to hear directly from pilots themselves about the problems caused by the ADIZ. And there are plenty. Meanwhile, pilots didn't realize that an ADIZ clearance wasn't the same thing as "radar identification," so that even though they were talking to ATC, they weren't receiving traffic advisories. William Finagin, whose company sells Aviat aircraft, said he has lost $1 million a year in sales since the ADIZ was imposed. Another local pilot based at Montgomery County Airpark inside the ADIZ said an FBO there had closed because of lack of business. "Flights to our home in Williamsburg (Virginia) are now 50 percent longer, and I spend $50 more for fuel, because of circumnavigating the ADIZ," said Russell Madsen. The public meeting continued through Thursday evening, with representatives from six federal agencies listening to pilots. A second public meeting, where AOPA President Phil Boyer will speak, is scheduled next Wednesday in Dulles, Virginia. Nearly 20,000 people have filed written comments, mostly in opposition to the ADIZ. If you haven't done so, file your comments today. The deadline is February 6. See AOPA's Member Action Center: Operation ADIZ ( http://www.aopa.org/adizalert ) for more information. |
#168
|
|||
|
|||
ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine
In article ,
Larry Dighera wrote: On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 19:08:06 -0800, "Peter Duniho" wrote in :: Anyone who thinks that comments to a NPRM will have any real effect on the outcome just hasn't been paying attention to the way the FAA has handled them. Well, perhaps an NPRM _meeting_ with representatives from six federal agencies listening to pilots will be more effective in getting a bad idea revoked: ------------------------------------------------------------- AOPA ePilot Volume 8, Issue 2 January 13, 2006 ------------------------------------------------------------- ADIZ DRAWS IRE FROM PILOTS DURING FIRST PUBLIC MEETING More than 200 people on Thursday filled a conference room in Columbia, Maryland, and almost all were there to tell federal officials why the Washington, D.C., Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) shouldn't be made permanent. "The ADIZ should be abolished," said Scott Proudfoot, one of the first speakers at the public meeting. He was speaking for the air traffic controllers union, NATCA, and added, "The ADIZ is nothing but a burden on the users and the controllers." AOPA had pushed for public meetings, arguing that regulators needed to hear directly from pilots themselves about the problems caused by the ADIZ. And there are plenty. Meanwhile, pilots didn't realize that an ADIZ clearance wasn't the same thing as "radar identification," so that even though they were talking to ATC, they weren't receiving traffic advisories. William Finagin, whose company sells Aviat aircraft, said he has lost $1 million a year in sales since the ADIZ was imposed. Another local pilot based at Montgomery County Airpark inside the ADIZ said an FBO there had closed because of lack of business. "Flights to our home in Williamsburg (Virginia) are now 50 percent longer, and I spend $50 more for fuel, because of circumnavigating the ADIZ," said Russell Madsen. The public meeting continued through Thursday evening, with representatives from six federal agencies listening to pilots. A second public meeting, where AOPA President Phil Boyer will speak, is scheduled next Wednesday in Dulles, Virginia. Nearly 20,000 people have filed written comments, mostly in opposition to the ADIZ. If you haven't done so, file your comments today. The deadline is February 6. See AOPA's Member Action Center: Operation ADIZ ( http://www.aopa.org/adizalert ) for more information. Two important questions to ask of the Homeland Security people in attendance: 1. Which one of you is Chicken Little? 2. Which one is Fearless Fosdick? -- Remve "_" from email to reply to me personally. |
#169
|
|||
|
|||
ADIZ Violation Explained in AOPA Magazine
Orval Fairbairn wrote:
1. Which one of you is Chicken Little? The guy on the left. 2. Which one is Fearless Fosdick? The guy on the right. http://www.aopa.org/images/whatsnew/...060112adiz.jpg George Patterson Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to your slightly older self. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Another ADIZ violation? | Dan Foster | Piloting | 5 | January 4th 06 02:25 AM |
ASRS/ASAP reporting systems - how confidential? | Tim Epstein | Piloting | 7 | August 4th 05 05:20 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Piloting | 133 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |