A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

When to acknowledge ATC



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old May 6th 05, 02:00 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jose wrote:
Class B airspace
requires ATC to tell you that you are cleared into it. So if ATC tells
you 'radar contact location, altimeter xx.xx', you're cleared through
that space where he's controlling



No. As you said, Class B airspace requires ATC to tell you you are
cleared into it. You need to hear "Cleared through the Bravo airspace"
or somesuch.

Nope, you just have to have a clearance. "Cleared into/through the
[NAME] Class Bravo" is just one form of it (and the safest for VFR's).
  #32  
Old May 6th 05, 02:23 PM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Class B airspace
requires ATC to tell you that you are cleared into it. So if ATC tells
you 'radar contact location, altimeter xx.xx', you're cleared through
that space where he's controlling




No. As you said, Class B airspace requires ATC to tell you you are cleared into it. You need to hear "Cleared through the Bravo airspace" or somesuch.

Nope, you just have to have a clearance. "Cleared into/through the
[NAME] Class Bravo" is just one form of it (and the safest for VFR's).


I stand corrected (but I will still ask for the magic words rather than
risk coming to the attention of the FAA!)

In any case, "radar contact location, altimiter xx.xx" is not a clearance.

Jose
--
Get high on gasoline: fly an airplane.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #33  
Old May 6th 05, 02:28 PM
Dylan Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com, Andrew wrote:
ATC says "radar contact, 20 miles south of XYZ, proceed on course". Do
you acknowledge this transmission?


Yes, but only with my callsign (abbreviated when applicable).

How about when ATC says "altimeter
setting 2992" on your first contact after a handoff? Does this require
acknowledgement?


And a readback. You want to know that both you and the controller are
working off the same altimeter setting or Bad Stuff may happen. My
readback is pretty short ('two niner niner two, november four one
bravo')

--
Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man
Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net
Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net
"Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee"
  #34  
Old May 6th 05, 05:45 PM
George Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Steven P. McNicoll wrote:

Altimeter settings don't tend to vary a great deal from one controller to
the next. If you're issued one that differs by more than a few points from
the previous then it's a good idea to check on it.


I rarely get an altimeter setting from a controller anyway. I make a point of
picking up the setting from AWOS stations in flight and from ATIS before arrival
or departure. As long as you tell the controller you have the ATIS, about the
only time they'll give you the setting is as a gentle notice that you don't seem
to be flying at the altitude at which you're supposed to be.

George Patterson
There's plenty of room for all of God's creatures. Right next to the
mashed potatoes.
  #35  
Old May 6th 05, 05:50 PM
George Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jose wrote:

No. As you said, Class B airspace requires ATC to tell you you are
cleared into it. You need to hear "Cleared through the Bravo airspace"
or somesuch.


The last clearance I got from New York ran something like "November 3162 Kebec,
climb to 2500 feet, heading 355, stay west of the river, report at the Hudson
tunnel."

George Patterson
There's plenty of room for all of God's creatures. Right next to the
mashed potatoes.
  #36  
Old May 6th 05, 06:19 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

Altimeter settings don't tend to vary a great deal from one controller to
the next. If you're issued one that differs by more than a few points from
the previous then it's a good idea to check on it.


During my short three years in the air, I had one IFR flight about a month
ago where the pressure difference between three approach facilities
(Syracuse to Buffalo, actual distance around 150nm) was almost 3/4's of an
inch. That equated to about 700 feet difference in altitude from start to
finish.

I recall a few of the airline pilots that morning were doing double-takes
and commenting on this dropping pressure as they flew west.

--
Peter


















----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #37  
Old May 6th 05, 07:23 PM
Happy Dog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"George Patterson"
Jose wrote:

No. As you said, Class B airspace requires ATC to tell you you are
cleared into it. You need to hear "Cleared through the Bravo airspace"
or somesuch.


The last clearance I got from New York ran something like "November 3162
Kebec, climb to 2500 feet, heading 355, stay west of the river, report at
the Hudson tunnel."


Ask for the clearance. You're in violation without it. ATC should know
better.

moo


  #38  
Old May 6th 05, 07:30 PM
Happy Dog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"George Patterson"

Altimeter settings don't tend to vary a great deal from one controller to
the next. If you're issued one that differs by more than a few points
from the previous then it's a good idea to check on it.


I rarely get an altimeter setting from a controller anyway. I make a point
of picking up the setting from AWOS stations in flight and from ATIS
before arrival or departure. As long as you tell the controller you have
the ATIS, about the only time they'll give you the setting is as a gentle
notice that you don't seem to be flying at the altitude at which you're
supposed to be.


No. They give you an altimeter setting almost every time you enter the
space they're working on initial contact. The point of this is that it
results in all aircraft in close proximity showing near identical altimeter
readings. You should also give the controller your altitude when you're
level after any change. Where do you fly where ATC doesn't give you the
setting on initial contact?

moo


  #39  
Old May 6th 05, 07:32 PM
Happy Dog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Peter R." wrote in message \

During my short three years in the air, I had one IFR flight about a month
ago where the pressure difference between three approach facilities
(Syracuse to Buffalo, actual distance around 150nm) was almost 3/4's of an
inch. That equated to about 700 feet difference in altitude from start to
finish.

I recall a few of the airline pilots that morning were doing double-takes
and commenting on this dropping pressure as they flew west.


Funny that. I flew from Toronto to NYC around that time. Maybe the same
day. I was astounded at the rate of change in settings. Never seen that
happen before.

moo


  #40  
Old May 6th 05, 07:57 PM
A Guy Called Tyketto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ron Natalie wrote:
A Guy Called Tyketto wrote:

If you're working in any sort of Class C or D airspace, his
response to you is in fact clearance into that airspace.


No clearance is required.


For Class C airspace, 2-way communication is the clearance into
that airspace. No, ATC doesn't ahve to 'clear' you into it, but the
communication is the clearance as is.

So if he
responds, you can fly through unless ATC tells you 'remain outside
Class x Airspace'. Then you must read back something.


The last sentence makes no sense whatsoever. If I call and he answers,
that's two-way communciation and that's all that's required.


If ATC tells you to remain outside a certain class airspace,
you must read that back and remain outside that airspace until he
clears you into it. Yes, it establishes communication, and normally
that is all that's needed. but ATC's actual notification of 'remain
outside Class x airspace' (where x is B, or C) overrides your clearance
into that airspace. You will need to remain outside that airspace until
told otherwise.

Class B airspace
requires ATC to tell you that you are cleared into it. So if ATC tells
you 'radar contact location, altimeter xx.xx', you're cleared through
that space where he's controlling, establishes 2-way comms, in which
you need to acknowledge that he hears you whether it's a vector he's
given you, or just replying with your callsign, that is all that's
needed. You can reply back with the alt. setting, but it isn't really
necessary.


RADAR CONTACT is not required. Altimeter setting is not required.
Readback is not required. You know he hears you because he responded
to your radio call with your call sign. I'm having a hard time
following your argument.


Actually, for Class B, it does. AIM 3-2-3.d.2 and 3-2-3.e back that:

3-2-3.e: ATC Clearances and Separation. An ATC clearance is
required to enter and operate within Class B airspace. VFR
pilots are provided sequencing and separation from other
aircraft while operating within Class B airspace.

For Class C, AIM 3-2-4.3 states that 2-way comms must be
established, and that is the clearance into/through Class C. But, if
ATC tells you to remain outside of it, you *MUST* remain outside of it
until told otherwise. Plus, a readback of that would be required.

BL.
- --
Brad Littlejohn | Email:
Unix Systems Administrator, |

Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! |
http://www.sbcglobal.net/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCe74byBkZmuMZ8L8RAlqHAKCDiIwC/DZKvK74zjHk7smf7uxcSgCgtQUa
oAEGUuO3awcwz2HutdswmF0=
=bc9u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What F-102 units were called up for Viet Nam Tarver Engineering Military Aviation 101 March 5th 06 03:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.