|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#19
June 16th 04, 06:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
"Sandy Mustard" wrote in message ... True, but Cincy approach may not let you into their class B airpspace without their radar working. Why not? Shila could have been the IAF, no reason FLM needs to be it. How could SHILA be an IAF? How can the FLM 338R be a procedure track id FLM is not an IAF? The Jepp charts for all LUK approaches show no difference in the line thicknesses so I guess everyone charted it wrong. Why is that necessarily so? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode