If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Comet trailer near catastrophe
A longer tongue increases the forces on it...
Lengthening the tongue can increase the bending moment (and the applied stresses if the diameter and wall thickness remain the same). But I don't think it's accurate to say that it increases the forces acting on the tongue. ...but increases the trailer stability... Definitely! I've never met a trailer stability problem that couldn't be fix by adding more tongue. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Comet trailer near catastrophe
*Hydraulic surge brakes seem like the modern
choice (versus pure mechanical). If I understand correctly, the most frequently encountered reason for using a mechanical surge brake is the parking brake feature, which is so convenient on our glider trailers. A mechanical parking brake can be left engaged indefinitely without harm or loss of effectiveness (at least until the brake shoes attach themselves to the drums through rusting/corrosion of the drums or actuating hardware which, from experience, can occur in a relatively short period of time if it's damp). There are some hydraulic parking brake systems that trap the pressure in the system and leave the brakes engaged but I don't know how well they work [can anyone comment?]. As a result, it's relatively easy to replace the German mechanical surge brake and axle on Komet/ Cobra trailers with a hydraulic version that brakes the trailer and provides a breakaway emergency feature. But it's far more difficult to provide the parking brake feature. Without knowing the relative cost, and having had to make this decision before, I'd generally recommend rebuilding/replacing components of the existing system if you want to keep a surge/parking brake. Chip Bearden ASW 24 "JB" USA |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Comet trailer near catastrophe
All of the above does also apply to home-built trailers. I own an all
Aluminum Schreder-type trailer, which was built very well. A few years ago, I inspected the tow bar, which was a 2" square steel tubing. I took a ball-peen hammer and could easily bash in the walls in several spots! The walls were very thin to begin with but had corroded from the inside outwards. I replaced the tow bar with a 2" stainless steel tube with a slightly thicker wall. The added weight was neglible. I also ran a loop of stainless steel cable through the inside around the bolts connecting the tow bar to the trailer and those connecting the coupler to the bar. Should the tow bar break, there is still the cable inside, which will keep the trailer from completely getting away and wandering off into the oncoming traffic. Safe flying and trailering U. Neumann |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
[quote=GM;611857
I replaced the tow bar with a 2" stainless steel tube with a slightly thicker wall. The added weight was neglible. I also ran a loop of stainless steel cable through the inside around the bolts connecting the tow bar to the trailer and those connecting the coupler to the bar. Should the tow bar break, there is still the cable inside, which will keep the trailer from completely getting away and wandering off into the oncoming traffic. Safe flying and trailering U. Neumann[/QUOTE] The cable is a great idea! The choice of stainless, however, I wouldnt take. Stainless will work harden from continual heat/cool cycles or vibration (like every bump you go over) and crack at the stressed points. Please check your stainless bar on a regular basis at its stressed points for VERY small cracks, once there, they will grow and split, probably on the same trip. The section will fail under tension, not compression. A better choice of towbar material would be mild steel with a heavy galvanic (hot dip) coating. The wall section does not have to be that heavy, its better to use a larger section, especially in the vertical direction. Do not seal the ends before gal dipping, this will ensure the coating goes inside as well and leaves a great protected spot for wiring runs. Do not weld to the assembly after gal dipping. If this style of towbar/tongue needs to be retrofitted to an existing trailer, use as many bolt points as possible to reduce the stress point. Bagger |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Comet trailer near catastrophe
On Mar 15, 8:28*pm, bagmaker
wrote: GM;611857 I replaced the tow bar with a 2" stainless steel tube with a slightly thicker wall. The added weight was neglible. I also ran a loop of stainless steel cable through the inside around the bolts connecting the tow bar to the trailer and those connecting the coupler to the bar. Should the tow bar break, there is still the cable inside, which will keep the trailer from completely getting away and wandering off into the oncoming traffic. Safe flying and trailering U. Neumann[/QUOTE Wrote: The cable is a great idea! The choice of stainless, however, I wouldnt take. Stainless will work harden from continual heat/cool cycles or vibration (like every bump you go over) and crack at the stressed points. Please check your stainless bar on a regular basis at its stressed points for VERY small cracks, once there, they will grow and split, probably on the same trip. The section will fail under tension, not compression. A better choice of towbar material would be mild steel with a heavy galvanic (hot dip) coating. The wall section does not have to be that heavy, its better to use a larger section, especially in the vertical direction. Do not seal the ends before gal dipping, this will ensure the coating goes inside as well and leaves a great protected spot for wiring runs. Do not weld to the assembly after gal dipping. If this style of towbar/tongue needs to be retrofitted to an existing trailer, use as many bolt points as possible to reduce the stress point. Bagger -- bagmaker- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bagger, points well taken - you must be a ME, too! I have inspected my tow bar closly (magnifying glass) on a regular basis since I do tow quite a bit with my old motor-home. The longer the distance between the rear axle and the hitch-ball, the greater the amplitude as you go over a bump hence the greater the whip-lash for the trailer. I have not detected any cracks so far - will do a dye- penetration test the next time. One other thing I have done to lower the stress in the bolting points under the trailer and the coupler is to insert heavy wall bushings on the inside of the tube. The bolt is now no longer able to crush or bow inwards the wall of the tube. To reduce the possibility of galvanic corrosion between the aluminum structure and the stainless tube, I applied a layer of heavy clear packaging tape over the tube in the areas of contact. Just don't count on using the tow bar as a vehicle ground lead anymore. It all sounds like a design overkill, but if its worth doing, it is worth overdoing, right? ;-) Uli Neumann |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spectacular footage from the Russian Air Show Catastrophe in July of 2002 | [email protected] | General Aviation | 1 | April 1st 06 07:13 AM |
Spectacular footage from the Russian Air Show Catastrophe in July of 2002 | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | April 1st 06 07:05 AM |
Drunk Pilot found Guilty of Risking Catastrophe | Tammy Rogers | Piloting | 5 | September 20th 04 02:15 PM |