ICAO English requirements changing in 2008?

Mxsmanic wrote in
:

Larry Dighera writes:

http://www.rmitenglishworldwide.com/icao.html

Excellent! Thanks.


Awww, aren't we a nice little camper.


Bertie

Larry Dighera wrote in
:

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:02:00 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote in :

I solved this problem by kill filtering Bertie shortly after
filtering MX. With MX filtered I was still seeing virtually all of
his posts since Bertie lacks the self-control to refrain from
responding it every single post MX makes. Once I filtered them
both, things returned almost to normal ... at least as normal as
r.a.p gets these days.


Why would I want to restrain myself? I only came here to troll him in
the first place..

Bertie

How does your trolling Mr. A. contribute to improving the newsgroup's
signal to noise ratio?



It doesn't. Why would you imagine it would?

You;re not to smart, are you Larry?


Bertie

Hi,

In article ,
Bertie the wrote:
Why would I want to restrain myself? I only came here to troll him in the
first place..

And to go Brit Bashing

Andy

Andy Hawkins wrote in
:

Hi,

In article ,
Bertie the wrote:
Why would I want to restrain myself? I only came here to troll him in
the first place..

And to go Brit Bashing


Nah, not that many here. It's only a bonus! I get to wind up plenty RL.
It;'s a funny thing, though. Brits seem to fall into several distinct
categories that way.
Some just ask for it and they are extremely satisfying and unbelievably
easy to wind up.
Some ask for it and it sails over their heads.
Some are just too scary to wind up.
Some it just kind of fizzles out or i feel bad for doing it after.
But with some it never even crosses my mind to wind them up.



Bertie

Hi,

In article ,
Bertie the wrote:
And to go Brit Bashing


Nah, not that many here. It's only a bonus! I get to wind up plenty RL.
It;'s a funny thing, though. Brits seem to fall into several distinct
categories that way.
Some just ask for it and they are extremely satisfying and unbelievably
easy to wind up.
Some ask for it and it sails over their heads.
Some are just too scary to wind up.
Some it just kind of fizzles out or i feel bad for doing it after.
But with some it never even crosses my mind to wind them up.

Hmm...I wonder which category you've put me into?

Andy

Andy Hawkins wrote in
:

Hi,

In article ,
Bertie the wrote:
And to go Brit Bashing


Nah, not that many here. It's only a bonus! I get to wind up plenty RL.
It;'s a funny thing, though. Brits seem to fall into several distinct
categories that way.
Some just ask for it and they are extremely satisfying and unbelievably
easy to wind up.
Some ask for it and it sails over their heads.
Some are just too scary to wind up.
Some it just kind of fizzles out or i feel bad for doing it after.
But with some it never even crosses my mind to wind them up.

Hmm...I wonder which category you've put me into?


Well, either 4 or 5. Usenet is different because there's no physical first
impression. You'd have probably been 5 if i had met you in person. Hard to
know though..


Bertie

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:04:22 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote in :

Larry Dighera wrote in
:

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:02:00 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote in :

I solved this problem by kill filtering Bertie shortly after
filtering MX. With MX filtered I was still seeing virtually all of
his posts since Bertie lacks the self-control to refrain from
responding it every single post MX makes. Once I filtered them
both, things returned almost to normal ... at least as normal as
r.a.p gets these days.


Why would I want to restrain myself? I only came here to troll him in
the first place..

Bertie

How does your trolling Mr. A. contribute to improving the newsgroup's
signal to noise ratio?



It doesn't.

So you publicly admit that your intent in stalking Mr. A. is to
negatively impact the quality of the newsgroup by lowering the
newsgroup's signal-to-noise ratio?

Why would you imagine it would?

Because a good netizen worthy of participation in this
world's-most-egalitarian-forum strives to improve Usenet as part of
the implicit licence granted to Usenet participants by the computer
system owners who freely donate their valuable labor and computing
resources for the noble cause that is Usenet. Usenet provides an
opportunity for mankind to demonstrate our capacity for
self-governance, the foundation of democracy. If instead we embrace
anarchy and devolution, we pathetically, publicly, parade our low,
uncivilized, brutish, feral and undignified ignobility before the
world, and shame those praiseworthy creators of Usenet upon whose
faith in the honorable capacity of mankind to act responsibly and
enlightened it rests.

You;re not to smart, are you Larry?


My head may stuffed with straw, but fortunately I am smart enough not
to resort to insults in a feeble attempt to demean those who expose my
faults, for personal attacks only serve to reveal a lack of expressive
ability and cognitive resources.


Bertie

Larry Dighera wrote in
:

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:04:22 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote in :

Larry Dighera wrote in
m:

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:02:00 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip

wrote in :

I solved this problem by kill filtering Bertie shortly after
filtering MX. With MX filtered I was still seeing virtually all
of
his posts since Bertie lacks the self-control to refrain from
responding it every single post MX makes. Once I filtered them
both, things returned almost to normal ... at least as normal as
r.a.p gets these days.


Why would I want to restrain myself? I only came here to troll him
in
the first place..

Bertie

How does your trolling Mr. A. contribute to improving the
newsgroup's
signal to noise ratio?



It doesn't.

So you publicly admit that your intent in stalking Mr. A. is to
negatively impact the quality of the newsgroup by lowering the
newsgroup's signal-to-noise ratio?


Nope. You ever work for Fox?


Why would you imagine it would?

Because a good netizen worthy of participation in this
world's-most-egalitarian-forum strives to improve Usenet as part of
the implicit licence granted to Usenet participants by the computer
system owners who freely donate their valuable labor and computing
resources for the noble cause that is Usenet. Usenet provides an
opportunity for mankind to demonstrate our capacity for
self-governance, the foundation of democracy. If instead we embrace
anarchy and devolution, we pathetically, publicly, parade our low,
uncivilized, brutish, feral and undignified ignobility before the
world, and shame those praiseworthy creators of Usenet upon whose
faith in the honorable capacity of mankind to act responsibly and
enlightened it rests.


So what's your point here?


You;re not to smart, are you Larry?


My head may stuffed with straw, but fortunately I am smart enough not
to resort to insults in a feeble attempt to demean those who expose my
faults, for personal attacks only serve to reveal a lack of expressive
ability and cognitive resources.



But you're not smart enough to kill-file me even though I told you to
months ago..



Go figure.

Bertie

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:52:12 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote in :

Larry Dighera wrote in
:

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:04:22 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote in :

Larry Dighera wrote in
:

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:02:00 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip

wrote in :

I solved this problem by kill filtering Bertie shortly after
filtering MX. With MX filtered I was still seeing virtually all
of
his posts since Bertie lacks the self-control to refrain from
responding it every single post MX makes. Once I filtered them
both, things returned almost to normal ... at least as normal as
r.a.p gets these days.


Why would I want to restrain myself? I only came here to troll him
in
the first place..

Bertie

How does your trolling Mr. A. contribute to improving the
newsgroup's
signal to noise ratio?



It doesn't.

So you publicly admit that your intent in stalking Mr. A. is to
negatively impact the quality of the newsgroup by lowering the
newsgroup's signal-to-noise ratio?


Nope.

Are you capable of perceiving that your trolling negatively impacts
the newsgroup's signal-to-noise ratio, or are you so self-absorbed
with your own emotional issues, that you are blind to the negative
impact your trolling causes? Are you so arrogant, that you feel that
the selfish joy you seek by trolling is more important than the good
of the newsgroup, and those fellow airmen among the readership of this
newsgroup who freely give of their knowledge and experience out of a
sense of camaraderie and goodwill toward their fellows?

Are your true motives for lowering the newsgroup's signal-to-noise
ratio a surreptitious attack to disrupt the dignity of this forum, and
drive away the valiant and altruistic contributors just to prove you
possess the power, all motivated by your self-perceived
ineffectiveness and inferiority? You're a bigger person than that,
aren't you?

You ever work for Fox?

No.

Why would you imagine it would?

Because a good netizen worthy of participation in this
world's-most-egalitarian-forum strives to improve Usenet as part of
the implicit licence granted to Usenet participants by the computer
system owners who freely donate their valuable labor and computing
resources for the noble cause that is Usenet. Usenet provides an
opportunity for mankind to demonstrate our capacity for
self-governance, the foundation of democracy. If instead we embrace
anarchy and devolution, we pathetically, publicly, parade our low,
uncivilized, brutish, feral and undignified ignobility before the
world, and shame those praiseworthy creators of Usenet upon whose
faith in the honorable capacity of mankind to act responsibly and
enlightened it rests.


So what's your point here?


The point you seem incapable of grasping is that your off-topic,
inane, badgering articles are beneath the dignity of humankind, not to
mention your fellow airmen. But you're just trolling me now ...


You;re not to smart, are you Larry?


My head may be stuffed with straw, but fortunately I am smart enough not
to resort to insults in a feeble attempt to demean those who expose my
faults, for personal attacks only serve to reveal a lack of expressive
ability and cognitive resources.



But you're not smart enough to kill-file me even though I told you to
months ago..


I prefer not to stick my head in the sand, thank you. And you
occasionally contribute worthy content, that I might miss if I were to
mask your articles from view.


Go figure.

Bertie

The way I figure it, you are a bit of a coward to conceal your true
identity behind a pseudonym when you attack other Usenet participants.
Why do you lack the courage and honesty to stand tall and take
responsibility for your actions? What do you fear? Are you
emotionally inferior to those who find no necessity for hiding? Such
malicious mischief cloaked in deceit is the mark of a simple child or
a roguish robber. Is deceit and cowardice really part of your true
nature? I prefer to think not, for you are a fellow airman, and I
know you are capable of exercising desecration and responsibility as
all airmen must.

So let's all take this opportunity to put our personal, petty
disagreements and prejudice feelings aside for the new year, and
embrace forgiveness and fellowship from here on.

Larry Dighera wrote in
:

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:52:12 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote in :

Larry Dighera wrote in
m:

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 12:04:22 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip
wrote in :

Larry Dighera wrote in
m:

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:02:00 +0000 (UTC), Bertie the Bunyip

wrote in :

I solved this problem by kill filtering Bertie shortly after
filtering MX. With MX filtered I was still seeing virtually all
of
his posts since Bertie lacks the self-control to refrain from
responding it every single post MX makes. Once I filtered them
both, things returned almost to normal ... at least as normal as
r.a.p gets these days.


Why would I want to restrain myself? I only came here to troll him
in
the first place..

Bertie

How does your trolling Mr. A. contribute to improving the
newsgroup's
signal to noise ratio?



It doesn't.

So you publicly admit that your intent in stalking Mr. A. is to
negatively impact the quality of the newsgroup by lowering the
newsgroup's signal-to-noise ratio?


Nope.

Are you capable of perceiving that your trolling negatively impacts
the newsgroup's signal-to-noise ratio, or are you so self-absorbed
with your own emotional issues, that you are blind to the negative
impact your trolling causes? Are you so arrogant, that you feel that
the selfish joy you seek by trolling is more important than the good
of the newsgroup, and those fellow airmen among the readership of this
newsgroup who freely give of their knowledge and experience out of a
sense of camaraderie and goodwill toward their fellows?

Are your true motives for lowering the newsgroup's signal-to-noise
ratio a surreptitious attack to disrupt the dignity of this forum, and
drive away the valiant and altruistic contributors just to prove you
possess the power, all motivated by your self-perceived
ineffectiveness and inferiority? You're a bigger person than that,
aren't you?

You ever work for Fox?

No.

Why would you imagine it would?

Because a good netizen worthy of participation in this
world's-most-egalitarian-forum strives to improve Usenet as part of
the implicit licence granted to Usenet participants by the computer
system owners who freely donate their valuable labor and computing
resources for the noble cause that is Usenet. Usenet provides an
opportunity for mankind to demonstrate our capacity for
self-governance, the foundation of democracy. If instead we embrace
anarchy and devolution, we pathetically, publicly, parade our low,
uncivilized, brutish, feral and undignified ignobility before the
world, and shame those praiseworthy creators of Usenet upon whose
faith in the honorable capacity of mankind to act responsibly and
enlightened it rests.


So what's your point here?


The point you seem incapable of grasping is that your off-topic,
inane, badgering articles are beneath the dignity of humankind, not to
mention your fellow airmen. But you're just trolling me now ...


You;re not to smart, are you Larry?


My head may be stuffed with straw, but fortunately I am smart enough
not to resort to insults in a feeble attempt to demean those who
expose my faults, for personal attacks only serve to reveal a lack
of expressive ability and cognitive resources.



But you're not smart enough to kill-file me even though I told you to
months ago..


I prefer not to stick my head in the sand, thank you. And you
occasionally contribute worthy content, that I might miss if I were to
mask your articles from view.


Go figure.

Bertie

The way I figure it, you are a bit of a coward to conceal your true
identity behind a pseudonym when you attack other Usenet participants.
Why do you lack the courage and honesty to stand tall and take
responsibility for your actions? What do you fear? Are you
emotionally inferior to those who find no necessity for hiding? Such
malicious mischief cloaked in deceit is the mark of a simple child or
a roguish robber. Is deceit and cowardice really part of your true
nature? I prefer to think not, for you are a fellow airman, and I
know you are capable of exercising desecration and responsibility as
all airmen must.


Well, then what's your problem?




So let's all take this opportunity to put our personal, petty
disagreements and prejudice feelings aside for the new year, and
embrace forgiveness and fellowship from here on.


Oh go **** yourslef Larry,.

You don't like me, then killfile me or shut the **** up.


You're a netkkkop, period.




Bertie